Charles Tilly and Relational Sociology

  • Chares Demetriou
Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

This chapter presents the distinctive approach to relationalism developed in Charles Tilly’s later work. It is an approach that assigns the chief explanatory role in social inquiry to accounts of changes in social relations, thus an approach serving substantive theory rather than general theory. In Tilly’s accounts, alterations of social relations typically configure into mechanisms and processes that explain central socio-political phenomena, especially at the macro and meso levels. Tilly developed explanations most particularly of democratization, social inequality, and contentious politics. The latter term, devised by Tilly, refers to political contention outside formal political institutions, in which actors raise claims that involve the government and affect others’ interests. This broad conceptualization—subsuming more common concepts such as social movements, revolutions, labor strikes, and so on—is characteristic of Tilly’s effort towards broad and innovative comparisons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alimi, Eitan, Chares Demetriou, and Lorenzo Bosi. 2015. The Dynamics of Radicalization: A Relational and Comparative Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Demetriou, Chares. 2009. The Realist Approach to Explanatory Mechanisms in Social Sciences: More than a Heuristic? Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (3): 440–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ———. 2012. Processual Comparative Sociology: Building on the Approach of Charles Tilly. Sociological Theory 30 (1): 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Krinsky, John, and Ann Mische. 2013. Formations and Formalisms: Charles Tilly and the Paradox of the Actor. The Annual Review of Sociology 39: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. McAdam, Doug, Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Tilly, Charles. 1964. The Vendee. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 1993. European Revolutions, 1492–1992. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 1998. Durable Inequality. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 2002. Stories, Identities, and Political Change. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 2003. The Politics of Collective Violence. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ———. 2004a. Social Movements, 1768–2004. Boulder and London: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2004b. Terror, Terrorism, Terrorists. Sociological Theory 22 (1): 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ———. 2005a. Identities, Boundaries, and Social Ties. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2005b. Trust and Rule. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ———. 2005c. Terror as Strategy and Relational Process. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 46 (1–2): 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ———. 2006a. Why: What Happens When People Give Reasons … And Why. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ———. 2006b. Regimes and Repertoires. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. ———. 2007. Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. ———. 2008a. Explaining Social Processes. Boulder: Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
  20. ———. 2008b. Contentious Performances. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tilly, Charles, and Sidney Tarrow. 2007. Contentious Politics. Boulder and London: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Tilly, Charles, and Chris Tilly. 1998. Work Under Capitalism. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chares Demetriou
    • 1
  1. 1.Lund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations