Wealthy Hubs and Poor Chains: Constellations in the U.S. Urban Migration System
Flows of people connect cities into complex systems. Urban systems research focuses primarily on creating economic models that explain movement between cities (whether people, telecommunications, goods or money), and more recently, finding strongly and weakly-connected regions. However, geometrically graphing the dependency between cities within a large network may reveal the roles of small and peripheral city agents in the system to show which cities switch regions from year to year, which medium-sized cities serve as collectors for large cities, and how the network is configured when connected by wealthy or deprived agents.
We propose a network configuration method called ‘best friend’ networks, where a node attaches to one preferential node, so that edges = nodes = n. Our case study is 20 years of migrants, sourced from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, traveling between U.S. cities. In our networks, an edge is created to link a city to its most popular migrant destination city for a given year. The resulting configurations reveal closely connected “constellations” of cities comprised of chains, trees, and hub-spoke structures that show how urban regions are configured. We also show routing behavior within these networks to reveal that high-income migrants tend to flock to hub cities, while low-income migrants form local city chains via nearby movements.
KeywordsMigration Urban hierarchy Economic systems Regional science Spatial interaction Complex systems
Thanks to Prathamesh Aher for helping prepare data.
- 3.Pred A (1980) Urban growth and city systems in the United States, 1840–1860. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- 4.Andris C, Halverson S, Hardisty F (2011) Predicting migration system dynamics with conditional and posterior probabilities. In: ICSDM 2011—Proceedings 2011 IEEE international conference on spatial data mining and geographical knowledge servicesGoogle Scholar
- 5.Harris JR, Todaro MP (1970) Migration, unemployment and development: a two-sector analysis. Am Econ Rev 60:126–142Google Scholar
- 8.Calabrese F, Dahlem D, Gerber A, Paul D, Chen X, Rowland J, Rath C, Ratti C (2011) The connected states of America: quantifying social radii of influence. In: Privacy, security, risk and trust (PASSAT) and 2011 IEEE third inernational conference on social computing (socialcom). pp 223–230Google Scholar
- 10.Meyer R (2014) The Geography of NFL Fandom. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/09/the-geography-of-nfl-fandom/379729/
- 11.Kotkin J (2001) The new geography: how the digital revolution is reshaping the American landscape. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 16.Andris C (2016) Integrating social network data into GISystems. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 30:2009–2031Google Scholar
- 19.Manduca RA (2014) Domestic migration networks in the United States. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
- 20.Guimera R, Mossa S, Turtschi A, Amaral LAN (2005) The worldwide air transportation network: anomalous centrality, community structure, and cities’ global roles. Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA 102:7794–7799Google Scholar
- 23.Dunne C, Shneiderman B (2013) Motif simplification: improving network visualization readability with fan, connector, and clique glyphs. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. pp 3247–3256Google Scholar
- 24.Jackson MO (2008) Social and economic networks. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.JGoogle Scholar
- 26.Csardi G, Nepusz T (2006) The igraph software package for complex network research. Int J Complex Syst 1695:1–9Google Scholar
- 29.Bastian M, Heymann S, Jacomy M (2009) Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In: Third International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. pp 361–362Google Scholar