Advertisement

Functional Anorectal Disorders

  • Brian L. Bello
  • D. Owen Young
  • Anjali S. Kumar
Chapter

Abstract

Functional anorectal disorders are characterized by constipation and are often associated with ineffective defecation, inappropriate contraction or weakening of pelvic floor muscles, abnormal propulsive forces, or outlet obstruction. Initial treatment is largely nonsurgical, and often involves behavioral and diet modification, fiber and bulking agents. Biofeedback also may be effective in some of these disorders. Surgical management is controversial and with limited studies of varying success.

Keywords

Functional anorectal disorders Anismus Perineal descent Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome Sigmoidocele 

References

  1. 1.
    Ramkumar D, Rao S. Efficacy and safety of traditional medical therapies for chronic constipation: systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100(4):936–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bove A. Consensus statement AIGO/SICCR diagnosis and treatment of chronic constipation and obstructed defecation (Part II: Treatment). World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(36):4994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Loening-Baucke V. Persistence of chronic constipation in children after biofeedback treatment. Dig Dis Sci. 1991;36(2):153–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dahl J, Lindquist B, Tysk C, Leissner P, Philipson L, Järnerot G. Behavioral medicine treatment in chronic constipation with paradoxical anal sphincter contraction. Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;34(9):769–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Turnbull G, Ritvo P. Anal sphincter biofeedback relaxation treatment for women with intractable constipation symptoms. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;35(6):530–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Papachrysostomou M, Smith A. Effects of biofeedback on obstructive defecation—reconditioning of the defecation reflex? Gut. 1994;35(2):252–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Keck J, Staniunas R, Coller J, Barrett R, Oster M, Schoetz D, et al. Biofeedback training is useful in fecal incontinence but disappointing in constipation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37(12):1271–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Glia A, Gylin M, Gullberg K, Lindberg G. Biofeedback retraining in patients with functional constipation and paradoxical puborectalis contraction. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40(8):889–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gilliland R, Heymen S, Altomare D, Park U, Vickers D, Wexner S. Outcome and predictors of success of biofeedback for constipation. Br J Surg. 1997;84(8):1123–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heymen S, Scarlett Y, Jones K, Ringel Y, Drossman D, Whitehead W. Randomized, controlled trial shows biofeedback to be superior to alternative treatments for patients with pelvic floor dyssynergia-type constipation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50(4):428–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chiarioni G, Salandini L, Whitehead W. Biofeedback benefits only patients with outlet dysfunction, not patients with isolated slow transit constipation. Gastroenterology. 2005;129(1):86–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rao S, Valestin J, Brown C, Zimmerman B, Schulze K. Long-term efficacy of biofeedback therapy for dyssynergic defecation: randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(4):890–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hart S, Lee J, Berian J, Patterson T, del Rosario A, Varma M. A randomized controlled trial of anorectal biofeedback for constipation. Int J Color Dis. 2011;27(4):459–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hallan R, Melling J, Womack N, Williams N, Waldron D, Morrison J. Treatment of anismus in intractable constipation with botulinum a toxin. Lancet. 1988;332(8613):714–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maria G, Brisinda G, Bentivoglio A, Cassetta E, Albanese A. Botulinum toxin in the treatment of outlet obstruction constipation caused by puborectalis syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43(3):376–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Joo J, Agachan F, Wolff B, Nogueras J, Wexner S. Initial North American experience with botulinum toxin type A for treatment of anismus. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39(10):1107–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ron Y, Avni Y, Lukovetski A, Wardi J, Geva D, Birkenfeld S, et al. Botulinum toxin type-A in therapy of patients with anismus. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(12):1821–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hompes R, Harmston C, Wijffels N, Jones O, Cunningham C, Lindsey I. Excellent response rate of anismus to botulinum toxin if rectal prolapse misdiagnosed as anismus (‘pseudoanismus’) is excluded. Color Dis. 2012;14(2):224–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Farid M, El Monem H, Omar W, El Nakeeb A, Fikry A, Youssef T, et al. Comparative study between biofeedback retraining and botulinum neurotoxin in the treatment of anismus patients. Int J Color Dis. 2008;24(1):115–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maria G, Anastasio G, Brisinda G, Civello I. Treatment of puborectalis syndrome with progressive anal dilation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40(1):89–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wasserman I. Puborectalis syndrome (rectal stenosis due to anorectal spasm). Dis Colon Rectum. 1964;7(2):87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Barnes P, Hawley P, Preston D, Lennard-Jones J. Experience of posterior division of the puborectalis muscle in the management of chronic constipation. Br J Surg. 1985;72(6):475–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kamm M, Hawley P, Lennard-Jones J. Lateral division of the puborectalis muscle in the management of severe constipation. Br J Surg. 1988;75(7):661–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liu Y, Zang J, Li Y. Treatment of musculi puborectalis syndrome with partial resection of musculi puborectalis: analysis in 149 cases. J LuoYang Med Coll. 2001;19:17–8.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yu D, Jin H. Surgical treatment for puborectalis hypertrophy. In: Wexner S, Duthie G, editors. Constipation: etiology, evaluation and management. 2nd ed. London: Springer; 2006. p. 247–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Faried M, El Nakeeb A, Youssef M, Omar W, El Monem H. Comparative study between surgical and non-surgical treatment of anismus in patients with symptoms of obstructed defecation: a prospective randomized study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(8):1235–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Parks A, Porter N, Hardcastle J. The syndrome of the descending perineum. Proc R Soc Med. 1966;59(8):477–82.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Thapar R, Patankar R, Kamat R, Thapar R, Chemburkar V. MR defecography for obstructed defecation syndrome. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2015;25(1):25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Alves-Ferreira P, Gurland B, Zutshi M, Hull T. Perineal descent does not imply a more severe clinical disorder. Color Dis. 2012;14(11):1372–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pucciani F, Boni D, Perna F, Bassotti G, Bellini M. Descending perineum syndrome: are abdominal hysterectomy and bowel habits linked? Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(11):2094–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ho Y, Goh H. The neurophysiological significance of perineal descent. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1995;10(2):107–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kiff E, Barnes P, Swash M. Evidence of pudendal neuropathy in patients with perineal descent and chronic straining at stool. Gut. 1984;25(11):1279–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jorge M, Wexner S, Ehrenpreis E, Nogueras J, Jagelman D. Does perineal descent correlate with pudendal neuropathy? Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36(5):475–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vaccaro C, Wexner S, Teoh T, Kyung Choi S, Cheong D, Salanga V. Pudendal neuropathy is not related to physiologic pelvic outlet obstruction. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38(6):630–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ambrose S, Keighley M. Outpatient measurement of perineal descent. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1985;67(5):306–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Foti P, Farina R, Riva G, Coronella M, Fisichella E, Palmucci S, et al. Pelvic floor imaging: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and conventional defecography in studying outlet obstruction syndrome. Radiol Med. 2013;118(1):23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Vanbeckevoort D, Hoe L, Oyen R, Ponette E, De Ridder D, Deprest J. Pelvic floor descent in females: comparative study of colpocystodefecography and dynamic fast MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;9(3):373–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kelvin F, Maglinte D, Hale D, Benson J. Female pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174(1):81–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Healy J, Halligan S, Reznek R, Watson S, Bartram C, Phillips R, et al. Dynamic MR imaging compared with evacuation proctography when evaluating anorectal configuration and pelvic floor movement. Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169(3):775–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Roos J, Weishaupt D, Wildermuth S, Willmann J, Marincek B, Hilfiker P. Experience of 4 years with open MR defecography: pictorial review of anorectal anatomy and disease. Radiographics. 2002;22(4):817–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fiaschetti V, Squillaci E, Pastorelli D, Rascioni M, Funel V, Salimbeni C, et al. Dynamic MR defecography with an open-configuration, low-field, tilting MR system in patients with pelvic floor disorders. Radiol Med. 2011;116(4):620–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Harewood G, Coulie B, Camilleri M, Rath-Harvey D, Pemberton J. Descending perineum syndrome: audit of clinical and laboratory features and outcome of pelvic floor retraining. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94(1):126–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lesaffer L, Milo R. Descending perineum syndrome: control defecogram with a “perineum device”, perspective in prevention and conservative therapy. J Belg Radiol. 2007;71(6):709–12.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Schey R, Cromwell J, Rao S. Medical and surgical management of pelvic floor disorders affecting defecation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(11):1624–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Guillemot F, Bouche B, Gower-Rousseau C, Chattier M, Wolschies E, Lamblin M, et al. Biofeedback for the treatment of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38(4):393–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Cundiff G, Harris R, Coates K, Low V, Bump R, Addison W. Abdominal sacral colpoperineopexy: a new approach for correction of posterior compartment defects and perineal descent associated with vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177(6):1345–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Link R, Su L, Bhayani S, Wright E. Laparoscopic sacral colpoperineopexy for treatment of perineal body descent and vaginal vault prolapse. Urology. 2004;64(1):145–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Parks A. Post-anal perineorrhaphy for rectal prolapse. Proc R Soc Med. 1967;60(9):920–1.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Nichols D. Retrorectal levatorplasty with colporrhaphy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1982;25(4):939–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Beco J. Interest of retro-anal levator plate myorrhaphy in selected cases of descending perineum syndrome with positive anti-sagging test. BMC Surg. 2008;8(1):13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Salamina G, Cesana B, Bernasconi F, Roviaro G. New trends in the surgical treatment of outlet obstruction: clinical and functional results of two novel transanal stapled techniques from a randomised controlled trial. Int J Color Dis. 2004;19(4):359–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Regadas F, Regadas S, Rodrigues L, Misici R, Silva F, Regadas Filho F. Transanal repair of rectocele and full rectal mucosectomy with one circular stapler: a novel surgical technique. Tech Coloproctol. 2005;9(1):63–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Cruz J, Regadas F, Murad-Regadas S, Rodrigues L, Benicio F, Leal R, et al. TRREMS procedure (transanal repair of rectocele and rectal mucosectomy with one circular stapler): a prospective multicenter trial. Arq Gastroenterol. 2011;48(1):3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Leal V, Regadas F, Regadas S, Veras L. Clinical and functional evaluation of patients with rectocele and mucosal prolapse treated with transanal repair of rectocele and rectal mucosectomy with a single circular stapler (TRREMS). Tech Coloproctol. 2010;14(4):329–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Madigan Morson B. Solitary ulcer of the rectum. Gut. 1969;10(11):871–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Torres C, Khaikin M, Bracho J, Luo C, Weiss E, Sands D, et al. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: clinical findings, surgical treatment, and outcomes. Int J Color Dis. 2007;22(11):1389–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Chiang J, Changchien C, Chen J. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: an endoscopic and histological presentation and literature review. Int J Color Dis. 2006;21(4):348–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Perito E, Mileti E, Dalal D, Cho S, Ferrell L, McCracken M, et al. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;54(2):266–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Halligan S, Nicholls R, Bartram C. Evacuation proctography in patients with solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: anatomic abnormalities and frequency of impaired emptying and prolapse. Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164(1):91–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Otto S, Oesterheld A, Ritz J, Gröne J, Wolf K, Buhr H, et al. Rectal anatomy after rectopexy: cinedefecography versus MR-defecography. J Surg Res. 2011;165(1):52–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Rao S, Ozturk R, De Ocampo S, Stessman M. Pathophysiology and role of biofeedback therapy in solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101(3):613–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Sitzler K, Nicholls M. Long-term clinical outcome of surgery for solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Br J Surg. 1998;85(9):1246–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Kargar S, Salmanroughani H, Binesh F, Taghipoor S, Kargar S. Laparoscopic rectopexy in solitary rectal ulcer. Acta Med Iran. 2011;49(12):810–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Kelvin F, Maglinte D, Hornback J, Benson J. Pelvic prolapse: assessment with evacuation proctography (defecography). Radiology. 1992;184(2):547–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Fenner D. Diagnosis and assessment of sigmoidoceles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(6):1438–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Jorge J, Yang Y, Wexner S. Incidence and clinical significance of sigmoidoceles as determined by a new classification system. Int J Color Dis. 1994;37(11):1112–7.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Laubert T, Kleemann M, Roblick U, Bürk C, Hildebrand P, Lewejohann J, et al. Obstructive defecation syndrome: 19 years of experience with laparoscopic resection rectopexy. Tech Coloproctol. 2013;17(3):307–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian L. Bello
    • 1
  • D. Owen Young
    • 2
  • Anjali S. Kumar
    • 3
  1. 1.Colorectal Surgery ProgramMedStar Washington Hospital CenterWashington, DCUSA
  2. 2.Pacific Medical CentersSeattleUSA
  3. 3.Washington State University, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Everett, Spokane, Tri-CitiesVancouverUSA

Personalised recommendations