Advertisement

Digital Transformation in the Pharmaceutical Compounds Supply Chain: Design of a Service Ecosystem with E-Labeling

  • Alexandra ÂngeloEmail author
  • João Barata
  • Paulo Rupino da Cunha
  • Vasco Almeida
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 299)

Abstract

We propose the design of a digital service ecosystem for the pharmaceutical compounds supply chain. Our method of inquiry is the canonical action research and a retail pharmacy provides the setting. A comprehensive review of existing literature about compounding of medicines is provided and six digital services identified: Supply management, Product traceability, Quality management, Order management, Digital assistant, and Product experience. The new services are supported by dynamic QR code identification and mHealth technologies. Preliminary results suggest that the digital ecosystems offer an opportunity to implement electronic labels (e-labels) in pharmacies, improve medicine information quality, and restore a broken link between medicine customer and medicine producer. Our findings can assist service design and service innovation in pharmaceutical supply chains. Moreover, they can support retail pharmacies in dealing with the increase of medicine compounding, address regulatory pressure for e-labeling, and to take advantage of their proximity to local communities.

Keywords

Digital transformation Digital ecosystem E-labeling QR code Pharmaceutical compounding Service innovation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been partially funded by European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), Centro 2020 Regional Operational Programme, Portugal 2020.

References

  1. 1.
    Taylor, D., Mrazek, M., Mossialos, E.: Regulating pharmaceutical distribution and retail pharmacy in Europe. In: Regulating Pharmaceuticals in Europe: Striving for Efficiency, Equity, and Quality, pp. 196–212 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Allen, L.V.: Contemporary pharmaceutical compounding. Ann. Pharmacother. 37, 1526–1528 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goundrey-Smith, S.: Pharmacy Management Systems. In: Goundrey-Smith, S. (ed.) Information Technology in Pharmacy, pp. 151–173. Springer, London (2013). doi: 10.1007/978-1-4471-2780-2_6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nanji, K.C., Cina, J., Patel, N., Churchill, W., Gandhi, T.K., Poon, E.G.: Overcoming barriers to the implementation of a pharmacy bar code scanning system for medication dispensing: a case study. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 16, 645–650 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Batenburg, R., Van Den Broek, E.: Pharmacy information systems: the experience and user satisfaction within a chain of Dutch pharmacies. Int. J. Electron. Healthc. 4, 119–131 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hines, L.E., Saverno, K.R., Warholak, T.L., Taylor, A., Grizzle, A.J., Murphy, J.E., Malone, D.C.: Pharmacists’ awareness of clinical decision support in pharmacy information systems: an exploratory evaluation. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 7, 359–368 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    El Mahalli, A., El-Khafif, S.H., Yamani, W.: Assessment of pharmacy information system performance in three hospitals in eastern province. Saudi Arabia. Perspect. Heal. Inf. Manag. 13, 1b (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Khlie, K., Abouabdellah, A.: A study on the performance of the pharmacy information system within the Moroccan hospital sector. In: 3rd International Conference on Logistics Operations Management (GOL). pp. 1–7. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mahoney, C.D., Berard-Collins, C.M., Coleman, R., Amaral, J.F., Cotter, C.M.: Effects of an integrated clinical information system on medication safety in a multi-hospital setting. Am. J. Heal. Pharm. 64, 1969–1977 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lapao, L.V., da Silva, M.M., Gregorio, J.: Implementing an online pharmaceutical service using design science research. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 17, 1–14 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weill, P., Woerner, S.L.: Thriving in an increasingly digital ecosystem. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 56, 27–34 (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barrett, M., Davidson, E., Prabhu, J., Vargo, S.L.: Service innovation in the digital age: key contributions and future directions. MIS Q. 39, 135–154 (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goldstein, S., Johnston, R., Duffy, J., Rao, J.: The service concept: the missing link in service design research? J. Oper. Manag. 20, 121–134 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Immonen, A., Ovaska, E., Kalaoja, J., Pakkala, D.: A service requirements engineering method for a digital service ecosystem. Serv. Oriented Comput. Appl. 10, 151–172 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Paul, R.J.: Challenges to information systems: time to change. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 16, 193–195 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Susman, G.I., Evered, R.D.: An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Adm. Sci. Q. 23, 582–603 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gulfo, J.: Pharmaceutical Compounding: The FDA Is Not The Problem. https://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2016/08/29/pharmaceutical-compounding-the-fda-is-not-the-problem/#1ed3715978df. Accessed 16 May 2017
  19. 19.
    Portuguese Ministry of Health: Ordinance 594/2004, 2nd July - Portuguese Law. Diário da República, 1.a série-B. 129, 3441–3445 (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Council of Europe: European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) 9th Edition. https://www.edqm.eu/en/european-pharmacopoeia-9th-edition. Accessed 16 May 2017
  21. 21.
    Fontaine, A.L.: Current requirements and emerging trends for labelling as a tool for communicating pharmacovigilance findings. Drug Saf. 27, 579–589 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nahler, G.: Company core data sheet CCDS. In: Nahler, G. (ed.) Dictionary of Pharmaceutical Medicine, p. 33. Springer, Vienna (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    European Commision: A Guideline on Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    HL7: Structured Product Labeling (SPL) Implementation Guide with Validation Procedures (2016)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Winterstein, A.G., Linden, S., Lee, A.E., Fernandez, E.M., Kimberlin, C.L.: Evaluation of consumer medication information dispensed in retail pharmacies. Arch. Intern. Med. 170, 1317–1324 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Songara, R.K., Sharma, G.N., Gupta, V.K., Gupta, P.: Need for harmonization of labeling of medical devices: a review. J. Adv. Pharm. Technol. Res. 1, 127–144 (2010)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fei, J., Liu, R.: Drug-laden 3D biodegradable label using QR code for anti-counterfeiting of drugs. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 63, 657–662 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Martin, I.G.: Electronic labeling: a paperless future? Drug Inf. J. 32, 917–919 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    CMDh: CMDh position paper on the use of QRD codes to provide information about the medicinal product 59, 1–5 (2015)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    AEMPS: Utilización de códigos quick response (QR) para proporcionar información sobre los medicamentos. Agencia española Medicam, 1–4 November 2015Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kierkegaard, P.: E-prescription across Europe. Health Technol. (Berl) 3, 205–219 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mira, J.J., Guilabert, M., Carrillo, I., Fernández, C., Vicente, M.A., Orozco-Beltrán, D., Gil-Guillen, V.F.: Use of QR and EAN-13 codes by older patients taking multiple medications for a safer use of medication. Int. J. Med. Inform. 84, 406–412 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tseng, M.H., Wu, H.C.: A cloud medication safety support system using QR code and Web services for elderly outpatients. Technol. Heal. Care. 22, 99–113 (2014)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lockwood, W.: QR codes: a digital avenue for PMI. Comput. Pharm. 33, 12–15 (2013)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Furner, C.P., Racherla, P., Babb, J.S.: What we know and do not know about mobile app usage and stickiness: a research agenda. Int. J. E-Serv. Mob. Appl. 7, 48–69 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Duke, J., Friedlin, J., Li, X.: Consistency in the safety labeling of bioequivalent medications. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 22, 294–301 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Duke, J., Friedlin, J., Ryan, P.: A quantitative analysis of adverse events and “Overwarning” in drug labeling. Arch. Intern. Med. 171, 944–946 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Davison, R., Martinsons, M.G., Kock, N.: Principles of canonical action research. Inf. Syst. J. 14, 65–86 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chiasson, M., Germonprez, M., Mathiassen, L.: Pluralist action research: a review of the information systems literature. Inf. Syst. J. 19, 31–54 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Baskerville, R.: information systems with action research: Investigating information systems with action research. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2, 1–32 (1999)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Davison, R.M., Martinsons, M.G.: Context is king! Considering particularism in research design and reporting. J. Inf. Technol. 31, 241–249 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lindgren, R., Henfridsson, O., Schultze, U.: Design principles for competence management systems: a synthesis of an action research study. MIS Q. 28, 435–472 (2004)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Andersen, P., Ross, J.W.: Transforming the LEGO group for the digital economy. In: ICIS 2016 Proceedings, Dublin, Ireland (2016)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Baskerville, R.: Design Theorizing Individual Information Systems. Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS). pp. 1–12 (2011)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Malaurent, J., Avison, D.: Reconciling global and local needs: a canonical action research project to deal with workarounds. Inf. Syst. J. 26, 227–257 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    European Commission: Green Paper on mobile Health (“mHealth”) (2014)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    European Commission: Regulation (EU) 207/2012 on electronic instructions for use of medical devices (2012)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    French, J.R.P.: Field experiments: changing group productivity. In: Miller, J.G. (ed.) Experiments in Social Process: A Symposium on Social Psychology, pp. 81–96. McGraw-Hill (1950)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexandra Ângelo
    • 1
    Email author
  • João Barata
    • 1
    • 2
  • Paulo Rupino da Cunha
    • 2
  • Vasco Almeida
    • 1
  1. 1.ISMT, Miguel Torga InstituteCoimbraPortugal
  2. 2.Department of Informatics Engineering, CISUCUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal

Personalised recommendations