Robot Assisted Laparoscopy for Genito-Urinary Prolapse

  • Dirk KuscheEmail author


Pelvic organ Prolapse (POP) is a quite common condition amongst women, especially elderly women seem to show a growing incidence, since obesity, rising age and other risk factors get more and more common; for minor prolapses, physical therapy and pelvic floor muscle exercises can be a sufficient form of therapy. In greater degrees of prolapse, a vaginal pessary can be inserted; in case of insufficient non-invasive strategies, surgical repair can be advised.


  1. 1.
    Huguir J, Scali P. Posterior suspension of the genital axis on the lumbosacral disc in treatment of uterine prolaps. Presse Med. 1958;66(35):781–4. (in French).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moreno Sierra J, Ortiz Oshiro E, Fernandez Pérez C, Galante Romo I, Corral Rosillo J, Prieto Nogal S, Castillon Vela IT, Silmi Moyano A, Alvarez Fernandez-Represa J. Long-term outcomes after robotic sacrocolpopexy in pelvic organ prolapse: prospective analysis. Urol Int. 2011;86(4):414–8. Epub 2011 Feb 24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brubaker L, Maher C, Jacquetin B, Rajamaheswari N, von Theobald P, Norton P. Surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2010;16(1):9–19. Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ganatra AM, Rozet F, Sanchez-Salas R, Barret E, Galiano M, Cathelineau X, Vallancien G. The current status of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a review. Eur Urol. 2009;55(5):1089–102. Epub 2009 Feb 4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Persson J. Robot-assisted laparoscopy for genital organ prolapse. In: John H, Wiklund P, editors. Robotic urology. Berlin: Springer; 2013. p. 389–93. isbn:978-3-642-33214-2.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wagner C, Akkoeze M, Rassweiler J, Kusche D. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy. Eur Urol Today. 2011.
  7. 7.
    Kusche D, Akkoeze M. The robot assisted sacrocolpopexy. 2010.
  8. 8.
    Di Marco DS, Chow GK, Gettmann MT, Elliot DS. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. Urology. 2004;63(2):373–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barboglio PG, Toler AJ, Triaca V. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014;20(1):38–43. Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kramer BA, Whelan CM, Powell TM, Schwartz BF. Robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy as management for pelvic organ prolapse. J Endourol. 2009;23(4):655–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Daneshgari F, Kefer JC, Moore C, Kaouk J. Robotic abdominal sacrocolpopexy/sacrouteropexy repair of advanced female pelvic organ prolapse (POP): utilising the POP-quantification-based staging outcome. BJU Int. 2007;100(4):875–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, Connolly A, Cundiff G, Weber AM. Pelvic floor disorders network. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(4):805–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Geller EJ, Siddiqui NY, Wu JM, Visco AG. Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(6):1201–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nosseir SB, Kim YH, Lind LR, Winkler HA. Sacral osteomyelitis after robotically assisted laparoscopic sacral colpopexy. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(Supl2):513–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mathieu R, Verhoest G, Vincendeau S, Manunta A, Bensalah K. Robotic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy: first experience with the novel Da Vinci single-site platform. World J Urol. 2014;32(1):273–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kaouk JH, Haber GP, Autorino R, Crouzet S, Ouzzane A, Flamand V, Villers A. A novel robotic system for single-port urologic surgery: first clinical investigation. Eur Urol. 2014;66(6):1033–1043. pii: S0302-2838(14)00613-7. Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cheon B, Gezgin E, Ji DK, Tomikawa M, Hashizume M, Kim HJ, Hong J. A single port laparoscopic surgery robot with high force transmission and a large workspace. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(9):2719–29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of UrologyKlinikum Dortmund GmbHDortmundGermany

Personalised recommendations