Advertisement

Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion: Orthotopic Neobladder

  • Abolfazl Hosseini
  • Achilles Ploumidis
  • Prasanna Sooriakumaran
  • Martin N. Jonsson
  • Christofer Adding
  • Peter Wiklund
Chapter

Abstract

The creation of the urinary diversion is a challenging surgical part after radical cystectomy and holds a special place in the development of urological practice. Following cystectomy, urine can either be diverted into an incontinent stoma, into a continent urinary reservoir catheterised by the patient or controlled by the anal sphincter, or into an orthotopic bladder substitute so that the patient voids per urethra.

During the last decade, urologists worldwide have witnessed a tremendous development of laparoscopic surgical treatment due to the development of robot-assisted surgery in many urological diseases. In parallel, the interest in expanding the role of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) for the management of urinary bladder cancer has risen during the last years and continues to grow. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic techniques have emerged allowing surgeons to more readily overcome the difficult learning curve and shorten operative times in minimally invasive abdominal and pelvic operations.

References

  1. 1.
    Schumacher MC, Jonsson MN, Wiklund NP. Robotic cystectomy. Scand J Surg. 2009;98:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beecken WD, Wolfram M, Engl T, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy and intra-abdominal formation of an orthotopic ileal neobladder. Eur Urol. 2003;44:337–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sala LG, Matsunaga GS, Corica FA, Ornstein DK. Robotassisted laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy and totally intracorporeal ileal neobladder. J Endourol. 2006;20:233–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Balaji KC, Yohannes P, McBride CL, Oleynikov D, Hemstreet GP III. Feasibility of robot-assisted totally intracorporeal laparoscopic ileal conduit urinary diversion: initial results of a single institutional pilot study. Urology. 2004;63:51–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hosseini A, Adding C, Nilsson A, Jonsson MN, Wiklund NP. Robotic cystectomy: surgical technique. BJU Int. 2011;108(6 Pt 2):962–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Murphy DG, Challacombe BJ, Elhage O, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy with extracorporeal urinary diversion: initial experience. Eur Urol. 2008;54:570–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang GJ, Barocas DA, Raman JD, Scherr DS. Robotic vs. open radical cystectomy: prospective comparison of perioperative outcomes and pathological measures of early oncological efficacy. BJU Int. 2008;101:89–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pruthi RS, Wallen EM. Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy: operative and pathological outcomes. J Urol. 2007;178:814–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Keim JL, Theodorescu D. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy in the management of bladder cancer. Sci World J. 2006;6:2560–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guru KA, Kim HL, Piacente PM, Mohler JL. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: initial experience at Roswell Park Cancer Institute. Urology. 2007;69:469–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hasson HM. Open laparoscopy vs. closed laparoscopy: a comparison of complication rates. Adv Plan Parent. 1978;13:41–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bigongiari LR. The Seldinger approach to percutaneous nephrostomy and ureteral stent placement. Urol Radiol. 1981;2:141–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abolfazl Hosseini
    • 1
  • Achilles Ploumidis
    • 1
  • Prasanna Sooriakumaran
    • 1
  • Martin N. Jonsson
    • 1
  • Christofer Adding
    • 1
  • Peter Wiklund
    • 1
  1. 1.Section of Urology, Department of Molecular Medicine and ‑Karolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations