Advertisement

Surgical Anatomy of the Bladder

  • Bastian Amend
  • Christian Schwentner
  • Karl-Dietrich Sievert
  • Arnulf Stenzl
Chapter

Abstract

Advancing from open to endoscopic surgery and continuing to robotic-assisted endoscopic surgery does not change the anatomical facts, but visual perspective changes literally. Both the angle of view of topographic relations between anatomical structures and the attention to details have been modified and enhanced by the technical development. Magnification and stereoscopic view along with the possibility of reduced tremor and precise preparation opened up these real-time insights into human pelvic anatomy. The following chapter addresses the macroscopic and microscopic anatomy of the urinary bladder with regard to special needs of a surgeon working endoscopically. In addition to basic anatomical knowledge, this chapter emphasizes the topographic female and male anatomy of the pelvis, the urethral sphincter mechanisms, and the continuously evolving field of genitourinary tract innervation. Whereas gross anatomy is substantially investigated and well known, microscopic anatomy, especially the complex pelvic neural network and the ultra structure of the rhabdosphincter, is still in the spotlight of scientific interest. The prostate and the periprostatic nerve courses are excluded and focused on in another chapter. The combination of new findings with traditional anatomical knowledge into urological practice will improve the treatment success for our patients after robotic pelvic surgery.

References

  1. 1.
    Toellner R. Illustrated history of medicine. Salzburg: Andreas & Andreas; 1986.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benninghoff A, Drenckhahn D. Anatomy. München/Jena: Urban & Fischer; 2003.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Campbell MF, Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR. In: Wein AJ (editor-in-chief), Kavoussi LR, et al., editors. Campbell-Walsh urology. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2007.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Netter FH. Atlas of human anatomy. Stuttgart/New York: Thieme; 1997.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Otcenasek M, Baca V, Krofta L, et al. Endopelvic fascia in women: shape and relation to parietal pelvic structures. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:622–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boccon-Gibod L, Steg A. Total cystectomy for bladder carcinoma: Denonvilliers fascia as a landmark. Urology. 1982;19:386–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shapiro E, Hartanto V, Perlman EJ, et al. Morphometric analysis of pediatric and nonhyperplastic prostate glands: evidence that BPH is not a unique stromal process. Prostate. 1997;33:177–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Do M, et al. Intrafascial nerve-sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2008;53:931–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stolzenburg JU, Schwalenberg T, Horn LC, et al. Anatomical landmarks of radical prostatecomy. Eur Urol. 2007;51:629–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Van Ophoven A, Roth S. The anatomy and embryological origins of the fascia of Denonvilliers: a medico-historical debate. J Urol. 1997;157:3–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wimpissinger TF, Tschabitscher M, Feichtinger H, et al. Surgical anatomy of the puboprostatic complex with special reference to radical perineal prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2003;92:681–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Young HH. The radical cure of cancer of the prostate. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1937;64:472–84.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schilling D, Horstmann M, Nagele U, et al. Cystectomy in women. BJU Int. 2008;102(9 Pt B):1289–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Colleselli K, Stenzl A, Eder R, et al. The female urethral sphincter: a morphological and topographical study. J Urol. 1998;160:49–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Baader B, Baader SL, Herrmann M, et al. Autonomic innervation of the female pelvis. Anatomic basis. Urol A. 2004;43:133–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baader B, Herrmann M. Topography of the pelvic autonomic nervous system and its potential impact on surgical intervention in the pelvis. Clin Anat. 2003;16:119–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ghoneim MA, Abol-Enein H. Lymphadenectomy with cystectomy: is it necessary and what is its extent? Eur Urol. 2004;46:457–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hutch JA. Saccule formation at the ureterovesical junction in smooth walled bladders. J Urol. 1961;86:390–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fritsch H, Lienemann A, Brenner E, et al. Clinical anatomy of the pelvic floor. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol. 2004;175(III–IX):1–64.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nakajima F, Takenaka A, Uchiyama E, et al. Macroscopic and histotopographic study of the deep transverse perineal muscle (musculus transversus perinei profundus) in elderly Japanese. Ann Anat. 2007;189:65–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Oelrich TM. The striated urogenital sphincter muscle in the female. Anat Rec. 1983;205:223–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Oelrich TM. The urethral sphincter muscle in the male. Am J Anat. 1980;158:229–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shafik A, Sibai OE, Shafik AA, et al. A novel concept for the surgical anatomy of the perineal body. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:2120–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stein TA, Delancey JO. Structure of the perineal membrane in females: gross and microscopic anatomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:686–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wallner C, Dabhoiwala NF, Deruiter MC, et al. The anatomical components of urinary continence. Eur Urol. 2009;55:932–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Koraitim MM. The male urethral sphincter complex revisited: an anatomical concept and its physiological correlate. J Urol. 2008;179:1683–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Strasser H, Ninkovic M, Hess M, et al. Anatomic and functional studies of the male and female urethral sphincter. World J Urol. 2000;18:324–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bastian Amend
    • 1
  • Christian Schwentner
    • 1
  • Karl-Dietrich Sievert
    • 1
  • Arnulf Stenzl
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of UrologyEberhard Karls UniversityTuebingenGermany

Personalised recommendations