Objectives: Slow waves of intracranial pressure (ICP) are spontaneous oscillations with a frequency of 0.3–4 cycles/min. They are often associated with pathological conditions, following vasomotor activity in the cranial enclosure. This study quantifies the effects of general anaesthesia (GA) on the magnitude of B-waves compared with natural sleep and the conscious state.
Materials and methods: Four groups of 30 patients each were formed to assess the magnitude of slow waves. Group A and group B consisted of normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) patients, each undergoing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) infusion studies, conscious and under GA respectively. Group C comprised conscious, naturally asleep hydrocephalic patients undergoing overnight ICP monitoring; group D, which included deeply sedated head injury patients monitored in the intensive care unit (ICU), was compared with group C.
Results: The average amplitude for group A patients was higher (0.23 ± 0.10 mmHg) than that of group B (0.15 ± 0.10 mmHg; p = 0.01). Overnight magnitude of slow waves was higher in group C (0.20 ± 0.13 mmHg) than in group D (0.11 ± 0.09 mmHg; p = 0.002).
Conclusion: Slow waves of ICP are suppressed by GA and deep sedation. When using slow waves in clinical decision-making, it is important to consider the patients’ level of consciousness to avoid incorrect therapeutic and management decisions.
General anesthesia Slow waves B-waves Intracranial pressure Hydrocephalus
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Conflicts of interest statement
We declare that we have no conflicts of interest.
Lalou DA, Czosnyka M, Donnelly J, Lavinio A, Pickard JD, Garnett M, Czosnyka Z. Influence of general anaesthesia on slow waves of intracranial pressure. Neurol Res. 2016;38(7):587–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Droste DW, Krauss JK. Simultaneous recording of cerebrospinal fluid pressure and middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity in patients with suspected symptomatic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993;56:75–792.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Lescot T, Naccache L, Bonnet MP, et al. The relationship of intracranial pressure Lundberg waves to electroencephalograph fluctuations in patients with severe head trauma. Acta Neurochir. 2005;147(2):125–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Lemaire JJ, Khalil T, Cervenansky F, et al. Slow pressure waves in the cranial enclosure. Acta Neurochir. 2002;144(3):243–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Weerakkody RA, Czosnyka M, Zweifel C. Slow vasogenic fluctuations of intracranial pressure and cerebral near infrared spectroscopy—an observational study. Acta Neurochir. 2010;152(10):1763–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Swallow DM, Fellner N, Varsos GV, et al. Repeatability of cerebrospinal fluid constant rate infusion study. Acta Neurol Scand. 2014;130(2):131–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Girard F, Moumdjian R, Boudreault D, et al. The effect of sedation on intracranial pressure in patients with an intracranial space-occupying lesion: remifentanil versus propofol. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(1):194–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Fodale V, Schifilliti D, Praticò C, et al. Remifentanil and the brain. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;52(3):319–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Pickard JD, Teasdale G, Matheson M, et al. Intraventricular pressure waves—the best predictive test for shunting in normal pressure hydrocephalus. In: Shulman K, Marmarou A, Miller JD, Becker DP, Hochwold GM, Brock M, editors. Intracranial pressure IV. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1980. p. 498–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar