Proper nail growth is dependent on a host of mechanical factors. Changes to the nail borders and forces affecting growth at the matrix often leads to pathology at the nail/skin interface. When conservative efforts fail there are a variety of surgical approaches and techniques available to the physician including: radical excision, rotational flap, wedge excision, partial nail avulsion (with/without matrixectomy), total nail avulsion (with/without matrixectomy). Treatment is ultimately up to the practitioner, however, the literature shows that nail removal with matrixectomy is the most effective response to a chronic ingrowing toenail. Current methods of treatment for onychocryptosis with matrixectomy are categorized either as a chemical ablation matrixectomy involving phenol or sodium hydroxide, or excisional matrixectomies which involve “cold steel” removal of the offending nail matrix with or without the nail bed. The Winograd and Frost procedures are examples of partial excisional matrixectomies indicated when an isolated nail border is affected. Some presentations may result in the need for total and permanent nail removal. These procedures involve nail plate avulsion followed by total matrixectomy by surgical excision or chemical cautery using phenol. The Zadik and Suppan procedures are examples of total excisional nail removal.
Nail surgery Matrixectomy Phenol ablation Nail avulsion Excisional matrixectomies
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Weisfeld M. Illustrated technique for the complete removal of nail matrix and hyponychium without skin incisions (Suppan nail technique n. 2). J Am Podiatry Assoc. 1975;65:481.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Boberg JS, Frederiksen MS, Harton FM. Scientific analysis of phenol nail surgery. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2002;92(10):575–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Kocyigit P, Bostancis, Ozdemire, et al. Sodium hydroxide chemical matrixectomy for the treatment of ingrown toenails: comparison of three different application periods. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31:744.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Napoli KL, Ingall CG, Martin GR. Safety and efficacy of chloral hydrate sedation in children undergoing echocardiography. J Pediatr. 1996;129:287–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Mayers DJ, Hindmarsh KW, Sankaran K, et al. Chloral hydrate disposition following single-dose administration to critically ill neonates and children. Dev Pharmacol Ther. 1991;16:71–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Cordoba Diaz D, Losa Iglesias ME, Cordoba Diaz M, Becerro de Bengoa Vallejo R. Enhanced removal of phenol with saline solution over alcohol: an in vitro study. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38(8):1296–301.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar