The Formation of the ‘Western’ Strategic Gaze: A Case Study on Emotional Irrelevance in International Politics

  • Christophe Wasinski
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in International Relations book series (PSIR)

Abstract

Why and how did a cartographic narrative emerge, which makes empathic emotions irrelevant, encourages resorting to violence, symbolically transforms ‘own troops’ into reified entities that can be sacrificed, and, in general, facilitates war-waging? The analysis of material factors (be they military manpower, defense budgets, and/or weapons available in armed forces’ arsenals) and/or of balances of power is not sufficient to decipher this puzzle. In order to understand war, it is necessary to take into account the existence of social representations, especially those contributing to hush up ‘positive’ (empathic) emotions toward the Other. Using a sociological historical approach inspired by Science and Technology Studies, this chapter aims at exploring the social forces that allowed such dehumanizing representations, thereby making emotions largely irrelevant, to succeed and circulate transnationally in Europe for centuries.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author would like to address special thanks to Constance de Lannoy, Maéva Clément, and Eric Sangar for their kind assistance during the writing of this chapter.

References

  1. Adler, K. (1997). Engineering the Revolution. Arms and Enlightenment in France, 1763–1815. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ashworth, T. (1968). The Sociology of Trench Warfare. British Journal of Sociology, 19(4), 407–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartov, O. (1991). Hitler’s Army. Soldiers, Nazis, and War in the Third Reich. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bataille, G. (1991). The Accursed Share (Vol. 1). London: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  5. Blanchard, A. (1996). Vauban. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  6. Boltanski, L. (2004). La condition foetale. Une sociologie de l’engendrement et de l’avortement. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  7. Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On Justification. Economies of Worth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bousquet, A. (2018). The Martial Gaze. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (To Be Published).Google Scholar
  9. Brown, K. (2008). “All They Understand Is Force”: Debating Culture in Operation Iraqi Freedom. American Anthropologist, 110(4), 443–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, K., & Lutz, F. (2007). Grunt Lit: The Participant-Observers of Empire. American Ethnologist. American Ethnologist, 34(2), 322–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bucholz, A. (1991). Moltke, Schlieffen, and Prussian War Planning. New York: Berg.Google Scholar
  12. Butler, J. (2010). Frames of War. When Life Is Grievable? Londres: Verso.Google Scholar
  13. Buzzell, C. (2005). My War. Killing Time in Iraq. London: Corgi.Google Scholar
  14. Cameron, C. M. (1994). American Samurai. Myth, Imagination, and the Conduct of Battle in the First Marine Division, 1941–1951. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Chagniot, J. (1997). Le chevalier de Folard. La stratégie de l’incertitude. Monaco: Editions du Rocher.Google Scholar
  16. Cohn, C. (1987). Sex and Death in the Rational World of Defense Intellectuals. Signs, 12(4), 687–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Colson, B. (1993). La culture stratégique américaine. L’influence de Jomini. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
  18. Colson, B. (1999). L’Art de la guerre de Machiavel à Clausewitz. Namur: Presses Universitaires de Namur.Google Scholar
  19. Colson, B., & Coutau-Bégarie, H. (Eds.). (2000). Pensée stratégique et humanisme. De la tactique des Anciens à l’éthique de la stratégie. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
  20. Corbin, A. (1993). The Village of Cannibals. Rage & Murder in France, 1870. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Croser, C. (2010). The New Spatiality of Warfare. Operational Uncertainty and the US Military in Iraq. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Debrix, F. (2007). Tabloid Terror. War, Culture, and Geopolitics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Der Derian, J. (2009). Virtuous War. Mapping the Military-Industrial-Media Entertainment Network. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Dodds, K., & Atkinson, D. (Eds.). (2002). Geopolitical Traditions. Critical Histories of a Century of Geopolitical Thought. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Doubler, M. D. (1994). Clowing with the Enemy. How GIs Fought the War in Europe, 1944–1945. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  26. Dower, J. M. (1987). War Without Mercy. Race and Power in the Pacific War. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  27. Duby, G. (1973). Guerriers et paysans: VIIe-XIIe siècles: Premier essor de l’économie européenne. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  28. Duffy, C. (1979). Siege Warfare. The Fortress in the Early Modern World 1494–1660. London: Routledge & Kagan Paul.Google Scholar
  29. Duffy, C. (1985). Fortress in the Age of Vauban and Frederick the Great 1660–1789. London: Routledge & Kagan Paul.Google Scholar
  30. Duffy, C. (1988). The Military Experience in the Age of Reason. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
  31. Echevarria, A. J. (2000). After Clausewitz. German Military Thinkers Before the Great War. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  32. Eden, L. (2004). Whole World on Fire. Organizations, Knowledge, and Nuclear Weapons Devastation. Cornell: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Elias, N. (1983). The Court Society. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  34. Ellis, J. (1986). The Social History of the Machine Gun. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  36. Gat, A. (2002). A History of Military Thought from Enlightenment to the Cold War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Goff, S. (2004). Full Spectrum Disorder. The Military in the New American Century. New York: Soft Skull.Google Scholar
  38. Gonzales de Leon, F. (1996). “Doctors of the Military Discipline”: Technical Expertise and the Paradigm of the Spanish Soldier in the Early Modern Period. Sixteenth Century Journal, 27(1), 61–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Guerlac, H. (1986). Vauban: The Impact of Science on War. In P. Paret (Ed.), Makers of Modern Strategy from Machiavelli to the Nuclear Age (pp. 64–90). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  40. Gusterson, H. (1998). Nuclear Rites: A Weapon Laboratory at the End of the Cold War. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  41. Henderson, K. (1995). The Visual Culture of Engineers. In S. Leigh Star (Ed.), The Cultures of Computing (pp. 196–218). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  42. Hull, I. V. (2004). Absolute Destruction. Military Culture and the Practices of War in Imperial Germany. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  43. James, W. (1884). What Is an Emotion? Mind, 9(34), 188–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. James, W. (2003). Essays in Radical Empiricism. New York City: Dover.Google Scholar
  45. Jeismann, M. (1997). La patrie de l’ennemi. La notion d’ennemi national et la représentation de la nation en Allemagne et en France de 1792 à 1918. Paris: CNRS Editions.Google Scholar
  46. Jervis, R. (1976). Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Kennedy, P. M. (1979). War Plans of the Great Powers, 1880–1914. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  48. Kleinschmidt, H. (1999). Using the Gun: Manual Drill and the Proliferation of Portable Firearms. The Journal of Military History, 63(3), 160–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kolko, G. (1994). Century of War. Politics, Conflict, and Society Since 1914. New York City: The New Press.Google Scholar
  50. Latour, B. (1988). Science in Action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Lauterbach, A. T. (1944). Militarism in the Western World: A Comparative Study. Journal of the History of Ideas, 5(4), 446–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. LeBleu, J. (2009). Long Rifle. A Sniper’s Story in Iraq and Afghanistan. Guilford: Lyons Press.Google Scholar
  53. Lembcke, J. (2000). The Spitting Image. Myth, Memory, and the Legacy of Vietnam. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Liulevicius, V. G. (2000). War Land on the Eastern Front. Culture, National Identity, and German Occupation in World War I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Luvaas, J. (1964). The Education of an Army. British Military Thought, 1815–1840. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Lynn, J. (1996). Bayonets of the Republic. Motivation and Tactics in the Army of the Revolutionary France, 1791–1794. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  57. Lynn, J. (1997). Giant of the Grand Siècle: The French Army, 1610–1715. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. MacKenzie, D. (1990). Inventing Accuracy. A Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile Guidance. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  59. Meridale, C. (2005). Ivan’s War. The Red Army 1939–1945. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  60. Mort, M. (2001). Building the Trident Network. A Study of the Enrolment of People, Knowledge, and Machines. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  61. Panofsky, E. (1975). La perspective comme forme symbolique. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
  62. Parker, G. (1996). The Military Revolution. Military Innovation and the Rise of the West, 1500–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Parrott, D. (2005). Cultures of Combat in the Ancient Régime: Linear Warfare, Noble Values, and Entrepreneurship. The International History Review, 27(3), 518–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pauwels, J. R. (2016). The Great Class War 1914–1918. Halifax: Lorimer.Google Scholar
  65. Pollak, M. D. (1991). Military Architecture Cartography & the Representation of the Early Modern European City. A Checklist of Treatises on Fortification in the Newberry Library. Chicago: The Newberry Library.Google Scholar
  66. Queloz, D. (2009). De la manœuvre napoléonienne à l’offensive à outrance. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
  67. Raffestin, C. (with Lopreno, D., Pasteur, Y.). 1995. Géopolitique et histoire. Lausanne and Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
  68. Ralston, D. (1990). Importing the European Army. The Introduction of European Military Techniques and Institutions in the Extra-European World, 1600–1914. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  69. Rancière, J. (2000). Le partage du sensible. Esthétique et politique. Paris: La Fabrique.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Renda, M. A. (2001). Taking Haiti. Military Occupation & the Culture of U.S. Imperialism (1915–1940). Chapel Hill and London: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  71. Reuter, T. (1985). Plunder and Tribute in the Carolingian Empire. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 35, 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ritchie, N. (2010). Relinquishing Nuclear Weapons: Identities, Network and the British Bomb. International Affairs, 86(2), 465–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Robbens, A. C. G. M. (2013). The Hostile Gaze: Night Vision and the Immediation of Nocturnal Combat in Vietnam and Iraq. In N. L. Whitehead & S. Finnström (Eds.), Virtual War and Magical Death: Technologies and Imaginaries for Terror and Killing (pp. 132–151).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ross, S. (1996). American War Plan 1945–1950. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  75. Rothenberg, G. E. (1981). The Art of War in the Age of Napoleonic. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Russell, E. P. (1996). “Speaking Annihilation”: Mobilizing for War Against Human and Insect Enemies, 1914–1945. Journal of American History, 82(4), 1505–1529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sampson, A. (1977). The Arms Bazaar. From Lebanon to Lockheed. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  78. Satia, P. (2008). Spies in Arabia. The Great War and the Cultural Foundations of Britain’s Covert Empire in the Middle East. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Shapiro, M. (1997). Violent Cartographies. Mapping the Cultures of War. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  80. Sherry, M. (1989). The Rise of American Air Power. The Creation of Armageddon. Yale: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Sofsky, W. (2003). Violence: Terrorism, Genocide, War. London: Granta.Google Scholar
  82. Tilly, C. (Ed.). (1975). The Formation of the National State in Western Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Travers, T. H. E. (1979). Technology, Tactics, and Morale: Jean de Bloch, the Boer War, and British Military Theory, 1900–1914. Journal of Modern History, 51(2), 264–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Vasquez, J. A. (1992). The War Puzzle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Virilio, P. (1989). War and Cinema. The Logistics of Perception. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  86. Virilio, P. (1994). Vision Machine: Perspectives. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  87. Wasinski, C. (2011). On Making War Possible. Soldiers, Strategy, and Military Grand Narrative. Security Dialogue, 42(1), 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Weber, M. (1965). Politics as a Vocation. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  89. White, R. K. (1966). Misperception and the Vietnam War. The Journal of Social Issues, XXII(3), 1–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zuber, T. (2002). Inventing the Schlieffen Plan: German War Planning 1871–1914. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christophe Wasinski
    • 1
  1. 1.Université libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations