Advertisement

Emotion Work in Ethnography

  • Ginny Mounce
Chapter

Abstract

The tensions and emotion work inherent in longitudinal ethnographic work are discussed in this chapter, using empirical evidence from the author's  Ph.D. The sustained involvement with research participants, characteristic of this approach, is not only advantageous in terms of data collection and insider viewpoint, but also challenging because of the extended duration of the research relationship. The study's themes, concerning the experiences of infertile couples starting fertility treatments, are of a highly emotional and intimate nature raising questions of privacy and threatening negative feelings in both researcher and participants. These issues, and that of reactivity, are discussed in terms of researcher experiences in the field, and she examines how reflexivity contributes to methodological and practical effect in this setting. The author suggests strategies for researchers working with similarly emotional topics.

References

  1. Allan, H. T. (1997). Reflexivity: A comment on feminist ethnography. Journal of Research in Nursing, 2(6), 455–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, D. (2004). Ethnomethodological insights into insider-outsider relationships. Nursing Inquiry, 11(1), 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arber, A. (2006). Reflexivity: A challenge for the researcher as practitioner? Journal of Research in Nursing, 11(2), 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brewer, J. D. (2000). Ethnography. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brocki, J., & Wearden, A. (2006). A critical evaluation of the use of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) in health psychology. Psychology and Health, 21(1), 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bryman, A. (1984). The debate about quantitative and qualitative research: A question of method or epistemology. British Journal of Sociology, 35(1), 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cain, C. L. (2012). Emotions and the research interview: What hospice workers can teach us. Health Sociology Review, 21(4), 396–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coffey, A. (1999). The ethnographic self: Fieldwork and the representation of identity. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Collington, V., & Hunt, S. C. (2006). Reflection in midwifery education and practice: An exploratory analysis. Evidence Based Midwifery, 4(3), 76–82.Google Scholar
  10. Dickson-Swift, V., James, E. L., Kippen, S., & Liamputtong, P. (2008). Risk to researchers in qualitative research on sensitive topics: Issues and strategies. Qualitative Health Research, 18(1), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307309007
  11. Dickson-Swift, V., James, E. L., Kippen, S., & Liamputtong, P. (2009). Researching sensitive topics: Qualitative research as emotion work. Qualitative Research, 9, 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duncombe, J., & Jessop, J. (2002). ‘Doing rapport’ and the ethics of ‘faking friendship. In M. L. Mauthner, M. Birch, J. Jessop, & T. Miller (Eds.), Ethics in qualitative research (pp. 107–122). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Finaly, L. (1998). Reflexivity: An essential component for all research? British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 453–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Finlay, L. (2002a). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research, 2, 209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Finlay, L. (2002b). “Outing” the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Finlay, L. (2008). Reflecting on ‘Reflective practice’. PBPL paper 52 (p. 25). The Open University.Google Scholar
  17. Fontana, A. (2004). Postmodern ethnography. In M. S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, & T. F. Liao (Eds.), The Sage encyclopedia of social science research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Froggatt, K. A. (1995). Keeping the balance: Hospice work, death and emotions. PhD doctoral, London South Bank University.Google Scholar
  19. Greil, A. L., Slauson-Blevins, K., & McQuillan, J. (2010). The experience of infertility: A review of recent literature. Sociology of Health & Illness, 32(1), 140–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01213.x
  20. Hammersley, M. (2013). What’s wrong with ethnography? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Hedican, E. J. (2008). Empathy. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (p. 253). Los Angeles, CA; London: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley; London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  24. Holloway, I., & Galvin, K. (2017). Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare (4th ed.). Chichester: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  25. Hunter, B. (2001). Emotion work in midwifery: A review of current knowledge. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 34(4), 436–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hunter, B., & Deery, R. (2009). Emotions in midwifery and reproduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones, B., & Ficklin, L. (2012). To walk in their shoes: Recognising the expression of empathy as a research reality. Emotion Space and Society, 5(2), 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Koch, T. (1996). Implementation of a hermeneutic inquiry in nursing: Philosophy, rigour and representation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24(1), 174–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee-Treweek, G., & Linkogle, S. (2000). Danger in the field: Risk and ethics in social research. London; New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Letherby, G. (2000). Dangerous liaisons: Auto/biography in research and research writing. In G. Lee-Treweek & S. Linkogle (Eds.), Danger in the field: Risk and ethics in social research (pp. 91–113). London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Lipson, J. G. (1991). The use of self in ethnographic research. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Qualitative nursing research: A contemporary dialogue (pp. 73–89). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mackintosh, C. (2007). Protecting the self: A descriptive qualitative exploration of how registered nurses cope with working in surgical areas. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44(6), 982–990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.04.009
  33. Maynard, M. (1994). Methods, practice and epistemology: The debate about feminism and research. In M. Maynard & J. Purvis (Eds.), Researching women’s lives from a feminist perspective (pp. 10–27). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  34. McLeod, S. A. (2009). Emotion focused coping. Retrieved March 8, 2017, from http://www.simplypsychology.org/stress-management.html#em
  35. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  36. Pellatt, G. (2003). Ethnography and reflexivity: Emotions and feelings in fieldwork. Nurse Researcher, 10(3), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2003.04.10.3.28.c5894
  37. Pelto, P. J. (2016). Applied ethnography: Guidelines for field research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Pillow, W. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16, 175–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Porter, S. (2000). Qualitative research. In D. Cormack (Ed.), The research process in nursing (4th ed., pp. 141–151). Oxford: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
  40. Rowling, L. (1999). Being in, being out, being with: Affect and the role of the qualitative researcher in loss and grief research. Mortality, 4(2), 167–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  42. Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London, ON: Althouse.Google Scholar
  43. Watts, J. H. (2007). Emotion, empathy and exit: Reflections on doing ethnographic qualitative research on sensitive topics. Medical Sociology Online, 3(2), 3–14.Google Scholar
  44. Williams, A. (1990). Reflections on the making of an ethnographic text. Studies in sexual politics, No. 29. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ginny Mounce
    • 1
  1. 1.Nuffield Department of Obstetrics and GynaecologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations