Advertisement

Concluding Discussion About Discoursal Identity and Learning Critical Thinking Through Creative Writing

  • Hélène Edberg
Chapter

Abstract

What are the impacts of discoursal identities on learning outcomes? What are the impacts of implementing a new, sociocritical approach to creative writing? This book reveals the complexity of learning through writing, as well as the complexity of transfer of knowledge between different activity systems. This chapter concludes and discusses the previous chapters and makes some comparative remarks. The concepts of the text-analytical model are discussed, in particular some theoretical concerns related to the concepts construed as text-analytical tools.

Keywords

Impact of identity Learning outcomes Sociocritical Writing discourse Transfer Text-analytical tools 

References

  1. Barton, David (1994). Literacy—An Introduction to the Ecology of Written Language. Oxford/Cambridge MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  2. Biggs, John & Tang, Catherine (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. 4th ed. Maidenhead, England: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press, McGraw-Hill House, pp. 45–57, 99.Google Scholar
  3. Blåsjö, Mona (2004). Studenters skrivande i två kunskapsbyggande miljöer. Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis. Stockholm Studies in Scandinavian Philology, N.S. 37. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
  4. Briens, Sylvain (2010). Paris: laboratoire de la littérature scandinave moderne, 1880–1905. Paris: Harmattan.Google Scholar
  5. Bruner, Jerome (1996). The Culture of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Burgess, Amy & Ivanič, Roz (2010). Writing and Being Written: Issues of Identity Across Timescales. In: Written Communication 27: 228. Downloaded March 2011: from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0741088310363447. s. 228–255.
  7. Daniels, Harry (2010). Implicit or Invisible Mediation in the Development of Interagency Work. In: H. Daniels et al. (eds.). Activity Theory in Practice: Promoting Learning Across Boundaries and Agencies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Elbow, Peter (1973). Writing Without Teachers. London/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Engeström, Yrjö (1987). Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsingfors universitet: Pedagogiska institutionen, Chaps.  2,  3,  4. Downloaded in March 2013 from http://lchc.ucsd.edu/mca/Paper/Engestrom/expanding/ch2.htm
  10. Engeström, Yrjö (2001). Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an Activity Theoretical Reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work 14/1: 134–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Engeström, Yrjö; Miettinen, Reijo; Punamäki, Raija-Leena (eds.). (1999). Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gee, James Paul (1990). Social Linguistics and Literacies—Ideology in Discourses. Basingstoke: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gee, James Paul (2001). Identity as an Analytic Lens for Research in Education. Review of Research in Education 25: 99–125. Downloaded in February 2014 from: www.bl.uk
  14. Havnes, Anton & McDowell, Liz (2008). Introduction: Assessment Dilemmas in Contemporary Learning Cultures; Connecting Education and Society Through Assessment. In: A. Havnes & L. McDowell (eds.). Balancing Dilemmas in Assessment and Learning in Contemporary Education. New York/London: Routledge, pp. 3–14, 29–32.Google Scholar
  15. Holland, Dorothy; Lachicotte, William Jr; Skinner, Debra, & Cain, Carole (2003 [1998]). Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds. Cambridge, MA & London, England: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Ivanič, Roz (1998). Writing and identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ivanič, Roz (2006). Language, Learning and Identification. In: R. Kiely et al. (eds.). Language. Culture and Identity in Applied Linguistics. University of Bristol: British Association for Applied Linguistics. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
  18. Leontiev, Aleksei (1978). The Problem of Activity and Psychology. Activity, Consciousness and Personality. Soviet Psychology 13/2: 4–33.Google Scholar
  19. Nussbaum, Martha Craven (1997). Cultivating Humanity; A Classical Defence of Reform in Liberal Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Schön, Donald A. ( 1983). The Reflective Practitioner; How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books/Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  21. Swayles, John (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 24–27.Google Scholar
  22. Wertsch, James V. (1998). Mind as Action. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Wiliam, Dylan (2008). Balancing Dilemmas; Traditional Theories and New Applications. In: A. Havnes & L. M. McDowell (eds.). Balancing Dilemmas in Assessment and Learning in Contemporary Education. New York/London: Routledge, pp. 269–281.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hélène Edberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Södertörn UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations