Mining Suspicious Tax Evasion Groups in a Corporate Governance Network

  • Wenda Wei
  • Zheng Yan
  • Jianfei Ruan
  • Qinghua Zheng
  • Bo Dong
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10393)

Abstract

There is a new tendency for corporations to evade tax via Interest Affiliated Transactions (IAT) that are controlled by a potential “Guanxi” between the corporations’ controllers. At the same time, the taxation data is a classic kind of big data. These issues challenge the effectiveness of traditional data mining-based tax evasion detection methods. To address this problem, we first coin a definition of controller interlock, which characterizes the interlocking relationship between corporations’ controllers. Next, we present a colored and weighted network-based model for characterizing economic behaviors, controller interlock and other relationships, and IATs between corporations, and generate a heterogeneous information network-corporate governance network. Then, we further propose a novel Graph-based Suspicious Groups of Interlock based tax evasion Identification method, named GSG2I, which mainly consists of two steps: controller interlock pattern recognition and suspicious group identification. Experimental tests based on a real-world 7-year period tax data of one province in China, demonstrate that the GSG2I method can greatly improve the efficiency of tax evasion detection.

Keywords

Tax evasion Controller interlock Corporate Governance Network Big data 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by “The Fundamental Theory and Applications of Big Data with Knowledge Engineering” under the National Key Research and Development Program of China with Grant No. 2016YFB1000903, the National Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 61502379, 61472317, 61532015, and Project of China Knowledge Centre for Engineering Science and Technology.

References

  1. 1.
    Battiston, S., Bonabeau, E., Weisbuch, G.: Decision making dynamics in corporate boards. Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 322, 567–582 (2003)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chua, A.Y., Balkunje, R.S.: Interlocking directorates and profitability: a social network analysis of fortune 500 companies. In: Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2012), pp. 1105–1110. IEEE Computer Society (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Connelly, B.L., Johnson, J.L., Tihanyi, L., Ellstrand, A.E.: More than adopters: competing influences in the interlocking directorate. Organ. Sci. 22(3), 688–703 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Croci, E., Grassi, R.: The economic effect of interlocking directorates in Italy: new evidence using centrality measures. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 20(1), 89–112 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Elouaer, S.: A social network analysis of interlocking directorates in french firms (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Labrinidis, A., Jagadish, H.V.: Challenges and opportunities with big data. Proc. VLDB Endow. 5(12), 2032–2033 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu, T.: An empirical study about the effects of interlocking directorates strategy on the firm’s output in the dynamic environment. In: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, JCAI 2009, pp. 818–820. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ma, J., DeDeo, S.: State power and elite autonomy: The board interlock network of Chinese non-profits. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.08103 (2016)
  9. 9.
    Mizruchi, M.S.: What do interlocks do? an analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 22(1), 271–298 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Peltonen, J., Rönkkö, M.: Board interlocks in high technology ventures: the relation to growth, financing, and internationalization. In: Tyrväinen, P., Jansen, S., Cusumano, M.A. (eds.) ICSOB 2010. LNBIP, vol. 51, pp. 163–168. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-13633-7_14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Robins, G., Alexander, M.: Small worlds among interlocking directors: network structure and distance in bipartite graphs. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 10(1), 69–94 (2004)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Suominen, A., Rilla, N., Oksanen, J., Still, K.: Insights from social network analysis-case board interlocks in finnish game industry. In: 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 4515–4524. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wenda Wei
    • 1
  • Zheng Yan
    • 2
    • 3
  • Jianfei Ruan
    • 1
  • Qinghua Zheng
    • 1
  • Bo Dong
    • 1
  1. 1.SPKLSTN LabXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina
  2. 2.State Key Lab on Integrated Services NetworksXidian UniversityXi’anChina
  3. 3.Department of Communications and NetworkingAalto UniversityEspooFinland

Personalised recommendations