Advertisement

Discourse Analysis

  • Aylin Kunter
Chapter

Abstract

Discourse is ‘language use relative to social, political and cultural formations; it is language reflecting social order but also language shaping social order, and shaping individuals’ interaction with society’ (Jaworski and Coupland, The Discourse Reader, 1999; Thomas, Journal of Management Studies, 40, 4, 2003). This definition focuses on language as the object of analysis, thus encouraging a linguistic analytical perspective. However, if we take the assumption that all facets of human experience and activity are socially constructed, it is to say that there can be no totally objective science, history and literary scholarship, as they are all influenced by the society in which they are created. Those who argue for the existence of a ‘discourse theory’ argue that historical accounts are socially constructed and that they are a product of the era and society within which the researcher is living (Marwick 1989). Assumptions behind the methodology of Discourse analysis (DA) recognize the role of ‘text’ or ‘discourse’ in our everyday lives and its contribution to the construction of our social and organizational realities. But before DA is summarized as a methodology, it is important to make clear what will be meant in this chapter by the terms text and discourse.

Keywords

Discourse Language 

References

  1. Boje, M., Oswick, C., & Ford, J. (2004). Language and Organization; the Doing of Discourse. The Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 571–578.Google Scholar
  2. Bordieu, P. (1991). Language & Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Burman, E., & Parker, L. (1993). Discourse Analytic Research London: Repertoires and Readings of Texts in Action. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Burrell, G. (1988). Modernism, Post Modernism and Organizational Analysis 2. The Contribution to Michael Foucault. Organization Studies, 9(2), 221–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Derrida, J. (1982). Margins of Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Fairclough, N. (1993). Discourse and Cultural Change in the Enterprise Culture. In D. Graddol, L. Thompson, & M. Byram (Eds.), Language and Culture. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  8. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Longman Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Fairclough, N. (2003). Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Fairclough, N. (2005). Critical Discourse Analysis in Transdisciplinary Research. In R. Wodak & P. Chilton (Eds.), A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Grant, G., Keenoy, T., & Oswick, C. (1998). Discourse and Organization. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hardy, C. (2001). Researching Organizational Discourse. International Studies of Management and Organization, 31(3), 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2010). Discourse, Field-Configuring Events, and Change in Organizations and Institutional Fields: Narratives of DDT and the Stockholm Convention. The Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jaworski, A., & Coupland, N. (1999). The Discourse Reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Lau, K. (2000). New Age Capitalism, Making Money East of Eden. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  16. Linstead, S., & Grafton-Small, R. (1992). On Reading Organizational Culture. Organization Studies, 13(3), 331–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marcus, G. E. (1994). On Ideologies of Reflexivity in Contemporary Efforts to Remake the Human Sciences. Poetics Today, 15(3), 383–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nissley, N. (2004). The Artful Creation of Positive Anticipatory Imaginery in Appreciative Inquiry. Understanding the Art of Appreciative Inquiry as Aestetic Discourse. In D. L. Cooperrider & M. Acital (Eds.), Constructive Discourse and Human Oragnization. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  19. Palus, C. J., & Horth, D. M. (2002). The Leader’s Edge. Six Creative Competencies for Navigating Complex Challenges. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  20. Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rose, N. (1990). Governing the Soul; The Shaping of the Private Self. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Thomas, P. (2003). The Recontextualization of Management: A Discourse-Based Approach to Analysing the Development of Management Thinking. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tsoukas, H. (2000). False Dilemmas in Organization Theory: Realism or Social Constructivism? Organization, 7(3), 531–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zizek, S. (2006, April 6). Nobody Has to Be Vile. London Review of Books, 28(7).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aylin Kunter
    • 1
  1. 1.Middlesex UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations