Apps as Companions: How Quantified Self Apps Become Our Audience and Our Companions



Self-tracking apps gather intimate information about our daily lives. Sometimes, they take the role of a confidante, an anthropomorphised companion we can trust. Humans have long confided in non-human companions, such as diaries. The relationship between user and app is structurally similar to the relationship narratologists and literary theorists have identified between diarist and diary. Our agency is always shared with the technologies we use, whether they are simply pen and paper or a complex AI. By comparing apps to diaries, I demonstrate how these technologies act not simply as objects but also as narrators and narratees. While diaries are mostly silent listeners, self-tracking apps speak back to us in a feedback loop and thus enter a role as our companions rather than simply as our audiences.


Self-tracking Quantified Self Apps Diary AI Narratology 


  1. Ajana, Btihaj. 2017. Digital Health and the Biopolitics of the Quantified Self. Digital Health 3 (January): 1–18. doi:10.1177/2055207616689509.Google Scholar
  2. Asimov, Isaac. 1950. I, Robot. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  3. Beadle, John. 1656. The Journal or Diary of a Thankful Christian: Presented in Some Meditations Upon Numb. 33.2. London: E. Cotes for Tho. Parkhurst.
  4. Braidotti, Rosi. 2013. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  5. Bridle, James. 2011. Where the F**k Was I? (A Book). June 24.
  6. Chatman, Seymour. 1978. Story and Discourse. Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. New York: Cornell UP.Google Scholar
  7. Dijck, Jose van. 2014. Datafication, Dataism and Dataveillance: Big Data between Scientific Paradigm and Ideology. Surveillance and Society 12 (2): 197–208.Google Scholar
  8. Guzman, Andrea L. 2017. Making AI Safe for Humans: A Conversation With Siri. In Socialbots: Digital Media and the Automation of Sociality, edited by Robert Gehl and Maria Bakardjieva. Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Hayles, N.Katherine. 1999. How We Became Posthuman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heehs, Peter. 2013. Writing the Self: Diaries, Memoirs, and the History of the Self. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  11. Heyman, Stephen. 2015. Google Books: A Complex and Controversial Experiment. The New York Times, October 28.
  12. Humphreys, Lee, Phillipa Gill, Balachander Krishnamurthy, and Elizabeth Newbury. 2013. Historicizing New Media: A Content Analysis of Twitter. Journal of Communication 63 (3): 413–431. doi:10.1111/jcom.12030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Iser, Wolfgang. 1978. The Implied Reader. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Lejeune, Philippe. 2008. On Diary, trans. Katherine Durnin. Manoa: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  15. Lüders, Marika. 2008. Conceptualizing Personal Media. New Media and Society 10 (5): 683–702. doi:10.1177/1461444808094352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Man, Paul de. 1979. Autobiography as De-Facement. MLN 94 (5): 919–930. doi:10.2307/2906560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Martinviita, Annamari. 2016. Online Community and the Personal Diary: Writing to Connect at Open Diary. Computers in Human Behavior 63 (October): 672–682. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McLuhan, Marshall. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extension of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  19. Michel, Jean-Baptiste, Yuan Kui Shen, Aviva Presser Aiden, Adrian Veres, Matthew K. Gray, The Google Books Team, Joseph P. Pickett, et al. 2011. Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books. Science 331 (6014): 6176–6182. doi:10.1126/science.1199644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Molina, J.Michelle. 2008. Technologies of the Self: The Letters of Eighteenth-Century Mexican Jesuit Spiritual Daughters. History of Religions 47 (4): 282–303. doi:10.1086/589802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nayar, Pramod. 2014. Posthumanism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  22. Nelson, Theodore. 1974. Computer Lib / Dream Machines. Self-published.Google Scholar
  23. Rettberg, Jill Walker. 2014a. Blogging, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  24. ———. 2014b. Seeing Ourselves Through Technology: How We Use Selfies, Blogs and Wearable Devices to See and Shape Ourselves. Basingbroke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. ———. 2017. Online Diaries and Blogs. In The Diary, ed. Batsheva Ben-Amos, and Dan Ben-Amos. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  26. ———. forthcoming. Snapchat. In Appified, ed. Jeremy Wade Morris, and Sarah Murray. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  27. Ruckenstein, Minna. 2014. Visualized and Interacted Life: Personal Analytics and Engagements with Data Doubles. Societies 4 (1): 68–84. doi:10.3390/soc4010068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Till, Chris. 2014. Exercise as Labour: Quantified Self and the Transformation of Exercise into Labour. Societies 4 (3): 446–462. doi:10.3390/soc4030446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Walker, Jill. 2004. How I Was Played by Online Caroline. In First Person: New Media as Story, Performance, and Game, ed. Noah Fruin, and Pat Harrigan. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Weizenbaum, Joseph. 1966. ELIZA: A Computer Program for the Study of Natural Language Communication between Man and Machine. Communications of the ACM 9 (January).
  31. Worboise, Emma Jane. 1866. The Fortunes of Cyril Denham, Part 1. The Christian World Magazine, January.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of BergenBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations