Advertisement

Empire Archaeologies: The Symbolic Interaction of Stereotype and New Self-Representation

  • James Haywood RollingJr.
Chapter

Abstract

Utilizing the intersection of Critical Race Theory and the de/re/constructive tenets of visual culture archaeology, this chapter proposes to explore the means by which the colonized reinterprets the colonizer through an examination of the intertextual subversions of African American artists ranging from Aaron Douglas to Kehinde Wiley. Visual culture archaeology recognizes the power-knowledge confluence that constitutes: (1) the social construction of modern Eurocentric institutions and identities; (2) the discursive matrices for the social construction of normativity; (3) socially transgressive interpretations of identity; and (4) the interrogation of visual culture as the arena wherein these contestations take place.

Keywords

Visual culture archaeology Critical race theory Symbolic interactionism Empire Identity 

References

  1. Anderson, W. T. (1997). The future of the self: Inventing the postmodern person. New York: Tarcher/Putnam.Google Scholar
  2. Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. Daniels, L., Strong, D. (Creators), Locke, A., Spellman, M., & George, L. (Producers). (2015). Empire [Television series]. Chicago: Fox.Google Scholar
  5. Dawson, J. (2015, March 11). What to make of Kehinde Wiley’s pervy Brooklyn Museum retrospective. The Village Voice. Retrieved from http://www.villagevoice.com/arts/what-to-make-of-kehinde-wileys-pervy-brooklyn-museum-retrospective-7194480
  6. Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  7. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language (trans: Sheridan Smith, A. M.). New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  8. Foucault, M. (1974). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  9. Foucault, M. (1989). Foucault live: Collected interviews, 1961–84. S. Lotringer (Ed.). New York: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
  10. Gardner, H. (1995). Leading minds: An anatomy of leadership. New York: BasicBooks.Google Scholar
  11. Garrison, J. (2009). Teacher as prophetic trickster. Educational Theory, 59(1), 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huber, L. P., & Solórzano, D. G. (2015). Visualizing everyday racism: Critical race theory, visual microaggressions, and the historical image of Mexican banditry. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(3), 223–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Locke, A. (Ed.). (1925/1992). The new negro. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  14. Mahon, M. (1992). Foucault’s Nietzschean genealogy: Truth, power, and the subject. New York: State University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  16. Pieterse, J. N. (1990). White on black: Images of Africa and blacks in western popular culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Powell, R. J., & Bailey, D. A. (Eds.). (1997). Rhapsodies in black: Art of the Harlem renaissance. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Rolling, J. H. (2003). Un-naming the story: The poststructuralist repositioning of African-American identity in western visual culture. Unpublished Ed.D. dissertation, New York, Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  19. Rolling, J. H. (2007). Visual culture archaeology: A criti/politi/cal methodology of image and identity. Cultural Studies↔Critical Methodologies, 7(1), 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rolling, J. H. (2011). Circumventing the imposed ceiling: Art education as resistance narrative. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(1), 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rolling, J. H., & Bey, S. (2016). Stargates: Managing stigma, challenging representations, and mediating identity through narrative. Studies in Art Education, 57(4), 307–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Scheurich, J. J. (1997). Research method in the postmodern. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  23. Smith, R. (2015, February 19). Review: ‘Kehinde Wiley: A New Republic’ at the Brooklyn Museum. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/20/arts/design/review-kehinde-wiley-a-new-republic-at-the-brooklyn-museum.html?_r=0
  24. Solórzano, D. G., & Yosso, T. J. (2002). Critical race methodology: Counter-storytelling as an analytical framework for education research. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 22–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Symbolic interactionism. (2017, April 14). In Wikipedia: The free encyclopedia. Retrieved April 14, 2017, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbolic_interactionism

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Haywood RollingJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Visual and Performing Arts / School of EducationSyracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations