Advertisement

Grounded Theory

  • Przemysław Hensel
  • Beata Glinka
Chapter

Abstract

Grounded theory is a strategy for conducting qualitative research without having a priori formulated hypotheses, but instead the method requires that researchers continuously compare and contrast pieces of collected empirical material to develop codes and categories that will serve in formulating a theory about the studied phenomenon. This chapter explains the logic of the grounded theory research strategy. The first part of the chapter presents the conceptual roots of the grounded theory approach and differences between deductive and inductive reasoning in theory development. The second part provides a broad description of the consecutive steps in the research process: data gathering, note-making, coding and theory development. Various coding strategies are explained and illustrated with examples. The chapter ends with enumeration of common misunderstandings associated with the grounded theory approach.

Keywords

Grounded theory Substantive theory Formal theory Mid-range theory Coding 

References

  1. Ashworth, P. (1996). Presuppose Nothing! The Suspension of Assumptions in Phenomenological Psychological Methodology. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 27(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Charmaz, K. (1983). The Grounded Theory Method: An Explication and Interpretation. In R. Emerson (Ed.), Contemporary Field Research: A Collection of Readings. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  4. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory. A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Czarniawska, B. (2007). Shadowing: And Other Techniques for Doing Fieldwork in Modern Societies. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
  6. Czarniawska-Joerges, B. (1988). To Coin a Phrase: The Study of Power and Democracy in Sweden. Stockholm: Regeringskansliets offsetcentral.Google Scholar
  7. Czarniawska-Joerges, B. (1992). Exploring Complex Organizations: A Cultural Perspective. Newbury Park/London/New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Denzin, N. K. (1970/2006). Sociological Methods: A Sourcebook. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.Google Scholar
  10. Fendt, J., & Sachs, W. (2008). Grounded Theory Method in Management Research: Users’ Perspectives. Organizational Research Methods, 11(3), 430–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fischer, C. T. (2009). Bracketing in Qualitative Research: Conceptual and Practical Matters. Psychotherapy Research, 19(4/5), 583–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances In the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.Google Scholar
  13. Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emergence vs Forcing. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.Google Scholar
  14. Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.Google Scholar
  15. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Hawthorne: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  16. Goulding, C. (2002). Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide for Management, Business and Market Researchers. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hensel, P. (2018). Organizational Responses to Proto-Institutions. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(2).Google Scholar
  18. Hernandez, C. A. (2009). Theoretical Coding in Grounded Theory Methodology. The Grounded Theory Review, 8(3), 51–60.Google Scholar
  19. Holton, J. A. (2010). The Coding Process and Its Challenges. The Grounded Theory Review, 9(1), 21–38.Google Scholar
  20. Konecki, K. (2008). Wizualna teoria ugruntowana. Rodziny kodowania wykorzystywane w analizie wizualnej. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, 3, 89–115.Google Scholar
  21. Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and Institutional Work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of Organization Studies (pp. 215–254). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Locke, K. (2001). Grounded Theory in Management Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Martin, P. Y., & Turner, B. A. (1986). Grounded Theory and Organizational Research. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22(2), 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McGhee, G., Marland, G. R., & Atkinson, J. (2007). Grounded Theory Research: Literature Reviewing and Reflexivity. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60(3), 334–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Suddaby, R. (2006). From the Editors: What Grounded Theory Is Not. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 633–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tan, J. (2010). Grounded Theory in Practice: Issues and Discussion for New Qualitative Researchers. Journal of Documentation, 66(1), 93–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Turner, B. A. (1981). Some Practical Aspects of Qualitative Data Analysis: One Way of Organizing the Cognitive Processes Associated with the Generation of Grounded Theory. Quality and Quantity, 15, 225–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Walsh, I., Holton, J. A., Bailyn, L., Fernandez, W., Levina, N., & Glaser, B. (2015). What Grounded Theory Is … A Critically Reflective Conversation Among Scholars. Organizational Research Methods, 18(4), 581–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Weick, K. (1985). Sources of Order in Underoganized Systems: Themes in Recent Organizational Theory. In Y. S. Lincoln (Ed.), Organizational Theory and Inquiry. The Paradigm Revolution (pp. 106–136). Sage: Beverly Hills/London/New Delhi.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Przemysław Hensel
    • 1
  • Beata Glinka
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WarsawWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations