Light Metals 2013 pp 1335-1340 | Cite as
Thermo-electro-mechanical characterization of anode interfaces at operating conditions
Abstract
A large amount of energy is lost at the interface between materials in electrodes, reducing process energy efficiency. Thus, the characterization of thermo-electro-mechanical behaviour of the interfaces is necessary to support the numerical modelling as an essential step in improving the design of the anode connection. Experiments have been performed on carbon-cast iron-steel samples taken from the anode assembly. The samples have been designed and prepared in such a way that they are representative of the industrial sealing process.
Some links between roughness and electrical resistivity have already been established in other studies [1]. In the present investigation, roughness measurements using laser profilometry have been carried out on samples subjected to compressive stress up to 2 MPa. Results have shown that loading effect is negligible on the asperities deterioration between the carbon-cast iron interfaces at this pressure.
The obtained values of thermal contact resistance (TCR) and electrical contact resistance (ECR) are in good agreement with the experimental data published in the literature, but still higher than those of the theoretical contact model. This study leads to the development of a new constitutive law for electrical and thermal contact resistance as a function of temperature and pressure.
Keywords
Aluminium reduction cell anode connection anode stub contact anode power losses electrical contact resistance thermal contact conductancePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.R. Holm: Electric Contact Theory and Applications, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Wilkening and Côté: Problems of the stub-anode connection, In Proc. TMS Light Metals, pp. 865–873, 2007.Google Scholar
- 3.W.T. Choate and J.A.S. Green, 2003. U.S. energy requirements for aluminum production: historical perspective, theoretical limits and new opportunities, Dept.of Energy, USA.Google Scholar
- 4.M.-H. Martin, 2013. Caractérisation des interfaces acier-fontecarbone de l’ensemble anodique d’une cuve d’électrolyse d’aluminium, Master thesis, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.Google Scholar
- 5.N. Kandev, H. Fortin, S. Chénard, G. Gauvin, M.-H. Martin and M. Fafard: New apparatus for characterizing electrical contact resistance and thermal contact conductance, In Proc. TMS Light Metals, pp. 1003–1008, 2011.Google Scholar
- 6.H. Fortin, M. Fafard, N. Kandev and P. Goulet: FEM analysis of voltage drop in the anode connector assembly. In Proc. TMS Light Metals, pp. 1055–1060, 2009.Google Scholar
- 7.D. Richard, P. Goulet, O. Trempe, M. Dupuis and M. Fafard: Challenges in stub hole optimization of cast iron rodded anodes. In Proc. TMS Light Metals, pp. 1067–1071, 2009.Google Scholar
- 8.M. Dupuis. Development and application of an ANYS based thermo-electro-mechanical anode stub hole design tool. In Proc. TMS Light Metals, pp. 433–438, 2010Google Scholar
- 9.S. Beier, J.J.J. Chen, H. Fortin and M. Fafard: FEM analysis of the anode connection in aluminium reduction cells, In Proc. TMS Light Metals, pp. 979–984, 2011Google Scholar
- 10.D. Molenaar, K. Ding and A. Kapoor: Development of industrial benchmark finite element analysis model to study energy efficient electrical connections for primary aluminium smelters, In Proc. TMS Light Metals, pp. 985–990, 2011.Google Scholar
- 11.R.W. Peterson: Temperature and voltage measurements in Hall cell anodes. In Proc. TMS Light Metals, pp. 365–382, 1976.Google Scholar
- 12.R.W. Peterson: Studies of stub to carbon voltage. In Proc. TMS Light Metals, pp. 367–378, 1978.Google Scholar
- 13.D. G. Brooks and V. L. Bullough: Factors in the design of reduction cell anodes. In Proc. TMS Light Metals, pp. 961–976, 1984.Google Scholar
- 14.M. Sørlie and H. Gran: Cathode collector bar to carbon contact resistance. In Proc. TMS Light Metals, pp. 779–787, 1992.Google Scholar
- 15.F. Hiltmann, J. Mittag, A. Store and H. A. Øye: Influence of temperature and contact pressure between cast iron and cathode carbon on contact resistance. In Proc. TMS Light Metals, pp. 277–283, 1996.Google Scholar
- 16.D. Richard, M. Fafard, R. Lacroix, P. Cléry and Y. Maltais.: Aluminum reduction cell anode stub hole design using weakly coupled thermo-electro-mechanical finite element models. Finite elements in analysis and design 37, pp. 287–304, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.D. Richard, M. Fafard, R. Lacroix, P. Cléry and Y. Maltais: Carbon to cast iron electrical contact resistance constitutive model for finite element analysis. Journal of Materials Processing technology 132, pp. 119–131, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.C. Laberge, L. Kiss and M. Desilets: The influence of the thermo-electrical characteristics of the coke bed on the preheating of an aluminum reduction cell, In Proc. TMS Light Metals, pp. 207–211, 2004.Google Scholar
- 19.M. Rouleau, 2007. Caractérisation thermo-électro-mécanique des interfaces fonte-acier-carbone dans une cuve d’électrolyse, Master thesis, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi (UQAC), Québec, Canada.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.L. St-Georges, L. I. Kiss and M. Rouleau: Evaluation of contact resistance in electrodes of Hall-Héroult process, In Proc. TMS Light Metals, pp. 1103–1108, 2009.Google Scholar
- 21.V. Singhai, P. J. Litke, A. F. Black and S. V. Garimella: An experimentally validated thermo-mechanical model for the prediction of thermal contact conductance, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 48, pp. 5446–5459, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.D. Picard, M. Fafard, G. Soucy, J.-F. Bilodeau: Room temperature long-term creep/relaxation behavior of carbon cathode material, Materials Science and Engineering A, 496, pp. 366–375, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.ASME B46.1, 2002 “Surface texture, surface roughness, waviness and lay”Google Scholar