Advertisement

Made to Remake the World: The Bronze Age Tool and the ‘Idea of Craft’

Chapter

Abstract

The metal tools of the Late Bronze Age in Europe, though lying at the heart of much discussion of technology and metallurgy, have remained less considered as objects which manifest the ‘idea’ of craft, both in being made and in being a means of making. In 1950 Robert Forbes lamented that too little attention was paid to Bronze Age metal tool finds save through typologies; nearly 70 years on, with some exceptions such as use-wear analysis, to a great extent that lament still stands.

An ‘idea’ of craft is integral to understanding tools in the world, considering them not only as the end result of a technological process but as part of a network of communicating agents transferring knowledge, making technological choices and decisions within social relationships, and practices allowing materials from a craftsperson’s world to be shaped into objects which themselves can be used to make and remake their world. This perspective is influenced by a range of technological, social and archaeological perspectives from individuals such as Adamson (Thinking through Craft, Berg, Oxford, 2007; 2010), Dobres (Cambridge J. Econ 34:103–114, 2010), Gosselain (Technology, Darvill T (ed) The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Ritual and Religion, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 243–260, 2011), Lemonnier (J Anthropol Archaeol 5:147–186, 1986; 1993) and Sennett (The Craftsman, Allen Lane, London, 2008).

This chapter explores the notion that Late Bronze Age tools manifest just such an idea of craft; they encapsulate technological potential and the social relationships that engendered that potential and embody social meanings in their form and the activities for which they were used. The discussion of contextualised meanings of craft beyond the physical builds upon Costin (Archaeol Method and Theory 3:1–56, 1991), Dobres (Meaning in the making: agency and the social embodiment of technology and art, Schiffer MB (ed) Anthropological perspectives on technology, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, pp 47–76, 2001) and Lemonnier (Mundane objects: materiality and non-verbal communication, Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, 2012). Within a socio-technological context, artefacts can embody the identity of makers and users (Chilton, Material meanings and meaningful materials: an introduction, Chilton ES (ed) Material meanings: Critical approaches to the interpretation of material culture, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp 1–6, 1999). S.A. Semenov’s (Preshitoric technology, Adams and Dart, London, 1964) ‘traceology’ asks whether and how the thought processes of prehistoric tool makers and tool users can be illustrated and in doing so considers crafting as reaction to, and adaptation of, materials and ideas. So, too, can the ways in which tools were treated, in their making and also in their ‘death’, be viewed as part of embedded social meanings that lay within the object and its use. Combined, these themes are explored to consider part of the meanings of craft in the Bronze Age world and the temporal influences which spread from there into the Iron Age and beyond. The discussion concludes by suggesting that the metal tools of the Northern European Bronze Age represent the foundations of a socio-technological continuum which extends to the present day; in that continuum, materials may have changed, but the same ideas of craft and crafting abound, and those ideas find form in tools which were, and are still, made to remake the world.

Keywords

Bronze Age Craft Makers Craftspeople Tools Woodcrafting Technology Metalwork Life cycle 

References

  1. Abell, S. W. (1948). The shipwright’s trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Adamson, G. (Ed.). (2007). Thinking through craft. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  3. Adamson, G. (Ed.). (2010). The Craft Reader. New York: Berg.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, P. C., Korobkova, G. F., Longo, L., Plisson, H., & Skakun, N. (2005). Various viewpoints on the work of S.A. Semenov. In L. Longo & N. Skakun (Eds.), The roots of use-wear analysis: Selected papers of S.A. Semenov (pp. 11–19). Verona: Museo Civico di Storia Naturale.Google Scholar
  5. Appadurai, A. (1986). Commodities and politics of value. In A. Appadurai (Ed.), The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective (pp. 3–64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bamforth, D. B., & Finlay, N. (2008). Introduction: Archaeological approaches to lithic production skill and craft learning. Archaeological Method and Theory, 15, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Banham, R. (2008[1973]). Sparks from a plastic anvil: The craftsman in technology. The Journal of Modern Craft, 1(1), 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barber, M. (2003). Bronze and the Bronze Age: Metalwork and society in Britain c2500-800BC. Stroud: Tempus.Google Scholar
  9. Barrett, J. C. (1980). The pottery of the later Bronze Age in lowland England. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 46, 297–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barrett, J., & Needham, S. (1988). Production, circulation and exchange: Problems in the interpretation of Bronze Age metalwork. In J. Barrett & S. Needham (Eds.), The archaeology of context in the Neolithic and Bronze Age (pp. 127–140). Sheffield: Sheffield University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bátora, J. (2002). Contribution to the problem of “craftsman” graves at the end of the Aeneolithic and in the Early Bronze Age in Central, Western and Eastern Europe. Slovenská Archeológia, L-2, 179–228.Google Scholar
  12. Becker, K. (2013). Transforming identities – New approaches to Bronze Age deposition in Ireland. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 79, 225–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bell, M., & Noble, G. (2012). Prehistoric woodland ecology. In A. M. Jones, J. Pollard, M. J. Allen, & J. Gardiner (Eds.), Image, memory and monumentality: Archaeological engagements with the material world, Prehistoric Society research paper 5 (pp. 80–92). Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
  14. Bergerbrant, S., Jørgensen, L. B., & Fossøy, S. H. (2013). Appearance in Bronze Age Scandinavia as seen from the Nybøl burial. European Journal of Archaeology, 16(2), 247–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bettinger, R., Winterhalder, B., & McElreath, R. (2006). A simple model of technological intensification. Journal of Archaeological Science, 33, 538–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Blandford, P. W. (1976). Old farm tools and machinery: An illustrated history. London: David & Charles.Google Scholar
  17. Blier, S. P. (1994[1987]). The anatomy of architecture: Ontology and metaphor in Batammaliba architectural expression. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Bloch, M. (1995). People into places: Zafimaniry concepts of clarity. In E. Hirsch & M. O’Hanlon (Eds.), The anthropology of landscape: Perspectives on place and space (pp. 63–77). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  19. Bloch, M. (2005). Essays on cultural transmission. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  20. Bradley, R. (1988). Hoarding, recycling and the consumption of prehistoric metalwork: Technological change in western Europe. World Archaeology, 20(2), 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bradley, R. (1991). Ritual, time and history. World Archaeology, 23(2), 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bradley, R. (1998). The passage of arms: An archaeological analysis of prehistoric hoard and votive deposits (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
  23. Brennand, M., & Taylor, M. (2003). The survey and excavation of a Bronze Age timber circle at Holme-next-the-Sea, Norfolk, 1998-9. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 69, 1–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Briard, J. (1976). The Bronze Age in barbarian Europe. London/Boston and Henley: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  25. Brumfiel, E. M., & Earle, T. K. (1987). Specialization, exchange and complex societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Budd, P., & Taylor, T. (1995). The faerie smith meets the bronze industry: Magic versus science in the interpretation of prehistoric metal-making. World Archaeology, 27(1), 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cazzella, A., & Recchia, G. (2013). Towards a global functional analysis. In L. Longo & N. Skakun (Eds.), “Prehistoric technology” 40 years later: Functional studies and the Russian legacy, BAR international series 1783 (pp. 267–274). Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
  28. Childs, S. T. (1994). Native copper technology and society in eastern North America. In D. A. Scott & P. Meyers (Eds.), Archaeometry of pre-Columbian sites and artifacts (pp. 229–253). Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute.Google Scholar
  29. Chilton, E. S. (1999). Material meanings and meaningful materials: An introduction. In E. S. Chilton (Ed.), Material meanings: Critical approaches to the interpretation of material culture (pp. 1–6). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
  30. Christensen, M. (1995). In the beginning was the potter: Material culture as mode of expression and anthropological object. Folk, 37, 5–24.Google Scholar
  31. Clark, P. (Ed.). (2004). The Dover Bronze Age boat. Swindon: English Heritage.Google Scholar
  32. Clark, J. E., & Parry, W. (1990). Craft specialisation and cultural complexity. Research in Economic Anthropology, 12, 289–346.Google Scholar
  33. Coates, J. (2005). Early seafaring in Northwest Europe: Could planked vessels have played a part? The Mariner’s Mirror, 91(4), 517–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Coghlan, H. H. (1951). Notes on the prehistoric metallurgy of copper and bronze in the Old World, Occasional papers in technology 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Coles, J. M. (2006). Ancient wood, woodworking and wooden houses. euroREA: Journal of (Re)construction and Experiment in Archaeology, 3, 50–57.Google Scholar
  36. Collingwood, R. G. (2010). Art and craft: From The Principles of Art. In G. Adamson (Ed.), The craft reader (pp. 417–423). New York: Berg.Google Scholar
  37. Coombs, D. G. (1979). The Figheldean hoard, Wiltshire. In C. Burgess & D. Coombs (Eds.), Bronze Age hoards: Some finds old and new, BAR British series 67 (pp. 253–268). Oxford: B.A.R.Google Scholar
  38. Costin, C. L. (1991). Craft specialization: Issues in defining, documenting, and explaining the Organization of Production. Archaeological Method and Theory, 3, 1–56.Google Scholar
  39. Craddock, P. T. (1991). Copper production in Bronze Age Britain. In J. D. Mohen (Ed.), Découverte de Metal (pp. 197–213). Paris: Picard: Musée des Antiquités nationals.Google Scholar
  40. Cunliffe, B., & O’Connor, B. (1979). The Late Bronze Age hoard from Danebury, Hants. In C. Burgess & D. Coombs (Eds.), Bronze Age hoards: Some finds old and new, BAR British series 67 (pp. 235–251). Oxford: B.A.R.Google Scholar
  41. Daniel, P. (2009). Archaeological excavations at Pode Hole Quarry: Bronze Age occupation on the Cambridgeshire Fen-edge, BAR British series 484. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
  42. Dobres, M.-A. (2001). Meaning in the making: Agency and the social embodiment of technology and art. In M. B. Schiffer (Ed.), Anthropological perspectives on technology (pp. 47–76). Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
  43. Dobres, M.-A. (2010). Archaeologies of technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34, 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Dormer, P. (1994). The art of the maker. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  45. Earwood, C. (1993). Domestic wooden artefacts in Britain and Ireland from Neolithic to Viking times. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.Google Scholar
  46. Edlin, H. L. (1949). Woodland crafts in Britain: An account of the traditional uses of trees and timbers in the British countryside. London: B.T. Batsford.Google Scholar
  47. Egger, H. (1983). Dating of Neolithic and Bronze Age sites. Mitteilungen- Bundesforschungsanstalt für Forst und Holzwirtschaft, 141, 169–177.Google Scholar
  48. Erhardt, K. L. (2009). Copper working technologies, contexts of use, and social complexity in the eastern woodlands of native North America. Journal of World Prehistory, 22, 213–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Fontijn, D. R. (2002). Sacrificial landscapes: Cultural biographies of persons, objects and ‘natural’ places in the Bronze Age of the southern Netherlands c2600-600BC, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia 32. Leiden: University of Leiden.Google Scholar
  50. Fontijn, D. R. (2007). The significance of ‘invisible’ places. World Archaeology, 39(1), 70–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Forbes, R. J. (1950). Metallurgy in antiquity: A notebook for archaeologists and technologists. Leiden: E.J.Brill.Google Scholar
  52. Goodburn, D. (2004). Assembly and construction techniques. In P. Clark (Ed.), The dover Bronze Age boat (pp. 124–162). Swindon: English Heritage.Google Scholar
  53. Gosselain, O. P. (2011). Technology. In T. Darvill (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the archaeology of ritual and religion (pp. 243–260). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Green, H. S. (1978). Late Bronze Age wooden hafts from Llyn Fawr and Penwyllt. Bulletin of the Board of Celtic Studies, 28, 136–141.Google Scholar
  55. Green, H. (2006). Wood: Craft, culture, history. New York: Viking Penguin.Google Scholar
  56. Haneca, K., Cufar, K., & Beeckman, H. (2009). Oaks, tree-rings and wooden cultural heritage: A review of the main characteristics and applications of oak dendronchronology in Europe. Journal of Archaeological Science, 36, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Harding, A. F. (2000). European societies in the Bronze Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Helms, M. W. (2009). The master(y) of hard materials: Thoughts on technology, materiality and ideology occasioned by the Dover boat. In P. Clark (Ed.), Bronze Age connections: Cultural contact in prehistoric Europe (pp. 149–158). Oxford/Oakville: Oxbow.Google Scholar
  59. Høgseth, H. B. (2013). Knowledge transfer: The craftsman’s abstraction. In W. Wendrich (Ed.), Archaeology and apprenticeship: Body knowledge, identity and communities of practice (pp. 61–78). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  60. Huth, C. (2000). Metal circulation, communication and traditions of craftsmanship in Late Bronze Age and early Iron age Europe. In C. F. E. Pare (Ed.), Metals make the world go round: The supply and circulation of metals in Bronze Age Europe – Proceedings of a conference held at the University of Birmingham in June 1997 (pp. 176–193). Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
  61. Inomata, T. (2001). The power of artistic creation: Elite craft specialists in classic Maya Society. Current Anthropology, 42(3), 321–349.Google Scholar
  62. Jennings, B. (2008). Prehistoric wood working in the Baltic regions: Toolmark analysis on a selection of timbers from a Late Bronze Age lake-dwelling settlement on lake Luokesas, Lithuania. Journal of Wetland Archaeology, 8(1), 122–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kienlin, T. L. (2007). From the forging of the axes: On the preparation and adaptation of metallurgical knowledge in course of the Early Bronze Age. Praehistoriche Zeitschrift, 82, 1–22.Google Scholar
  64. Koch, E. (1999). Neolithic offerings from the wetlands of eastern Denmark. In B. Coles, J. Coles, & M. S. Jørgensen (Eds.), Bog bodies, sacred sites and wetland archaeology (pp. 125–131). Exeter: Wetland Archaeology Research Project.Google Scholar
  65. Kölcze, Z. (2014). The Fårdrup-type shaft-hole axes: Material hybridity in Bronze Age Europe c. 1600 BC. In S. Reiter, H. W. Nørgaard, Z. Kölcze, & C. Rassmann (Eds.), Rooted in movement: Aspects of mobility in Bronze Age Europe (pp. 77–88). Højbjerg: Jutland Archaeological Society.Google Scholar
  66. Kristiansen, K. (1978). The consumption of wealth in Bronze Age Denmark: A study in the dynamics of economic processes in tribal societies. In K. Kristiansen & P. Muller (Eds.), New directions in Scandinavian archaeology (pp. 158–190). Copenhagen: The National Museum of Denmark.Google Scholar
  67. Kuhn, S. L. (2004). Evolutionary perspectives on technology and technological change. World Archaeology, 36(4), 561–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lahiri, N. (1995). Indian metal and metal-related artefacts as cultural signifiers: An ethnographic perspective. World Archaeology, 27(1), 116–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Lee, R. W. (2014). Influences of Wood-crafting on technological development in Middle to Late Bronze Age Southern England. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Southampton, Southampton.Google Scholar
  70. Lemonnier, P. (1986). The study of material culture today: Toward an anthropology of technical systems. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 5, 147–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Lemonnier, P. (1992). Elements for an anthropology of technology, Anthropological papers of the Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, no. 88. Ann Arbour: Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  72. Lemonnier, P. (Ed.). (1993). Technological Choices: Transformation in Material Cultures since the Neolithic. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  73. Lemonnier, P. (2012). Mundane objects: Materiality and non-verbal communication. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  74. Lucie-Smith, E. (1981). The story of craft: The craftsman’s role in society. Oxford: Phaidon.Google Scholar
  75. Marston, J. M. (2009). Modelling wood acquisition strategies from archaeological charcoal remains. Journal of Archaeological Science, 36, 2192–2200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Martin, S. (1999). Wonderful power: The story of ancient copper working in the Lake Superior Basin. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Marzalico, F. (2004). 150 years of lake dwelling research in northern Italy. In F. Menotti (Ed.), Living on the lake in prehistoric Europe: 150 years of lake-dwelling research (pp. 83–97). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  78. Matsui, A. (1992). Wetland sites in Japan. In B. Coles (Ed.), The wetland revolution in prehistory (pp. 5–14). Exeter: The Prehistoric Society and WARP.Google Scholar
  79. McGrail, S. (1998). Ancient boats in North-West Europe: The archaeology of water transport to AD1500. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  80. Moore, C. N., & Rowlands, M. J. (1972). Bronze Age metalwork in Salisbury museum. Salisbury: Salisbury and South Wiltshire Museum.Google Scholar
  81. Morgan, R. A. (1988). Tree-ring studies of wood used in Neolithic and Bronze Age trackways from the Somerset levels, BAR British series (Vol. 184(i)). Oxford: B.A.R.Google Scholar
  82. Muhly, J. D. (1985). Sources of tin and the beginnings of bronze metallurgy. American Journal of Archaeology, 89(2), 275–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Nakashima, G. (2010). The soul of a tree. In G. Adamson (Ed.), The craft reader (pp. 219–226). New York: Berg.Google Scholar
  84. Needham, S. (1978). The extent of foreign influence on Early Bronze Age axe development in southern Britain. In M. Ryan (Ed.), The origins of metallurgy in Atlantic Europe: Proceedings of the fifth Atlantic colloquium, Dublin, 30th March to 4th April (pp. 265–293). Dublin: Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  85. Needham, S. (2001). When expediency broaches ritual intent: The flow of metal between systemic and buried domains. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 7(2), 275–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Neipert, M. (2006). Der Wanderhandwerker. Leidorf: Rahden.Google Scholar
  87. Niedderer, K., & Townsend, K. (2011). Expanding craft: Reappraising the value of skill. Journal of Craft Research, 2, 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Nienhuis, J., Sietsma, J., & Arnoldussen, S. (2011). The production process and potential usage of bronze Geistingen axes. Journal of Archaeology in the Low Countries, 3(1/2), 47–63.Google Scholar
  89. Nørgaard, H. W. (2014). Are valued craftsmen as important as prestige goods: Ideas about itinerant craftsmanship in the Nordic Bronze Age. In S. Reiter, H. W. Nørgaard, Z. Kölcze, & C. Rassmann (Eds.), Rooted in movement: Aspects of mobility in Bronze Age Europe (pp. 37–52). Højbjerg: Jutland Archaeological Society.Google Scholar
  90. Noshiro, S., Suzuki, M., & Yamoda, M. (1992). Species selection for wooden artefacts by prehistoric and early historic peoples in the Kanto Plain, Central Japan. Journal of Archaeological Science, 19(4), 429–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Osborne, R. (2004). Hoards, votives, offerings: The archaeology of the dedicated object. World Archaeology, 36(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Parker Pearson, M., Pollard, J., Richards, C., Thomas, J., Tilley, C., Welham, K., & Albarella, U. (2006). Materialising Stonehenge: The Stonehenge riverside project and new discoveries. Journal of Material Culture, 11(1/2), 227–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Peregrine, P. (1991). Some political aspects of craft specialisation. World Archaeology, 23, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Polanyi, M. (1964[1958]). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. New York/Evanston: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
  95. Porter, T. (2004). Wood: Identification and use – Revised and expanded. Lewes: Guild of Master Craftsmen.Google Scholar
  96. Randsborg, K. (2002). Wetland hoards. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 21(4), 415–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Reiter, S. S. (2014). Identity lies in the eye of the beholder: A consideration of identity in archaeological contexts. In V. Ginn, R. Enlander, & R. Crozier (Eds.), Exploring identity in prehistoric Europe: Our construct or theirs? (pp. 13–21). Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
  98. Roberts, B. W., & Ottaway, B. S. (2003). The use and significance of Late Bronze Age socketed axes in Britain: An experimental and contextual approach. Journal of European Archaeology, 6(2), 117–139.Google Scholar
  99. Roberts, B. W., Ucklemann, M., & Brandherm, D. (2013). Old father time: The Bronze Age chronology of Western Europe. In A. Harding & H. Fokkens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the European Bronze Age (pp. 17–46). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  100. Roberts, B. W., Boughton, D., Dinwiddy, M., Doshi, N., Fitzpatrick, A. P., Hook, D., Meeks, N., Mongiatti, A., Woodward, A., & Woodward, P. J. (2014). Collapsing commodities or lavish offerings? Understanding massive metalwork deposition at Lanton Matravers, Dorset, during the Bronze Age-Iron age transition. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 34(4), 365–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Rønne, P. (1993). Problemer omkring bronzealderens metalhåndværkere. In L. Forsberg & T. B. Larsson (Eds.), Ekonomi och näringsformer i nordisk Bronsålder (pp. 71–92). Umeå: Studia Archaeologica Universitatis Umensis.Google Scholar
  102. Rowley, S. (1997). “There once lived”...Craft and narrative traditions. In S. Rowley (Ed.), Craft and contemporary theory (pp. 76–84). St Leonards: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  103. Sands, R. (1997). Prehistoric woodworking: The analysis and interpretation of Bronze and Iron Age toolmarks, Wood in archaeology (Vol. 1). London: UCL Institute of Archaeology.Google Scholar
  104. Schmidt, P. K., & Burgess, C. B. (1991). The Axes of Scotland and Northern England. Prähistorische Bronzefunde 9(7). München: BeckGoogle Scholar
  105. Semenov, S. A. (1964). Prehistoric technology. London: Adams and Dart.Google Scholar
  106. Semenov, S. A. (1970). The form and funktions of the oldest tools. Quatär, 21, 1–20.Google Scholar
  107. Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  108. Shimada, I. (2007). Introduction. In I. Shimada (Ed.), Craft production in complex societies: Multicraft and producer perspectives (pp. 1–21). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
  109. Sørensen, M. L. S. (1997). Reading dress: The construction of social categories and identities in Bronze Age Europe. Journal of European Archaeology, 5, 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Stevens, F. (2008). Elemental interplay: The production, circulation and deposition of Bronze Age metalwork in Britain and Ireland. World Archaeology, 40(2), 238–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Szabó, P. (2005). Woodland and forests in medieval Hungary, British archaeological reports international series (Vol. 1348). Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
  112. Tapper, R. Q. (2011). Middle and Late Bronze Age settlement on the south downs: The case study of black patch. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
  113. Taylor, M., & Pryor, F. (1990). Bronze Age building techniques at Flag Fen, Peterborough, England. World Archaeology, 21(3), 425–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Thomas, C. (1953). Folklore from a Northern Henge Monument. Folklore, 64(3), 427–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Turner, L. (2010). A re-interpretation of the later Bronze Age metalwork hoards of Essex and Kent: Volume 1, BAR British series (Vol. 507). Oxford: John & Erica Hedges Ltd.Google Scholar
  116. van Beek, W.E.A., Bedaux, R.M.A., Blier, S.P., Bouju, J., Crawford, P.I., Douglas, M., Lane, P. And Meillassoux, C. (1991) ‘Dogon restudied: A field evaluation of the work of Marcel Griaule [and comments and replies]’ Current Anthropology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 139–167.Google Scholar
  117. van de Noort, R. (2009). Exploring the ritual of travel in prehistoric Europe: The Bronze Age sewn-plank boats in context. In P. Clark (Ed.), Bronze Age connections: Cultural contact in prehistoric Europe (pp. 159–175). Oxford/Oakville: Oxbow.Google Scholar
  118. van de Noort, R. (2013). Seafaring and riverine navigation in the Bronze Age of Europe. In A. Harding & H. Fokkens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the European Bronze Age (pp. 382–397). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  119. van der Leeuw, S. (1993). Giving the potter a choice: Conceptual aspects of pottery techniques. In P. Lemonnier (Ed.), Technological choices: Transformation in material cultures since the Neolithic (pp. 238–288). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  120. Watson, C. (2005). Seahenge: An archaeological conundrum. Swindon: English Heritage.Google Scholar
  121. Wells, P. S. (2007). Structures of craft production, society and political control: Late prehistoric and early Roman temperate Europe. In I. Shimada (Ed.), Craft production in complex societies: Multicraft and producer perspectives (pp. 137–151). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
  122. York, J. (2002). The life-cycle of Bronze Age metalwork from the Thames. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 21(1), 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rob Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.North SomersetUK

Personalised recommendations