Advertisement

Southern Criminology in the Post-colony: More Than a ‘Derivative Discourse’?

  • Mark Brown
Chapter

Abstract

The idea of Southern criminology poses a challenge not just to its mainstream parent, which is now asked to contemplate life, crime and social order outside the metropolitan North, but also asks those who would work under its name to find new ways of thinking about phenomena so that the South is understood on its own terms. This chapter contemplates such challenges. It draws upon a body of postcolonial thought largely unknown within criminology to help think through Southern criminology’s options for escaping the cultural and epistemological confines of mainstream, Enlightenment thought. It illustrates ways of building out from these forms of thought, which can never totally be escaped, to represent and give voice to other experiences of life and other ways of being human.

Keywords

Postcolonial criminology Epistemologies India Colonial criminology Derivative discourse 

References

  1. Adami, R. (2015). On subalternity and representation: Female and post colonial subjects claiming universal human rights in 1948. Journal of Research on Women and Gender, 6, 56–66.Google Scholar
  2. Asiatic Society of Bengal. (1867). Proceedings of the Asiatic Society of Bengal: January to December 1866. Calcutta: Baptist Mission Press.Google Scholar
  3. Banerjee, S. (1919). Principles of Criminology, with Special Reference to Their Application to India. Bhawanipur, Calcutta: Aryya Press.Google Scholar
  4. Booth-Tucker, F. (1916). Criminocurology: The Indian Crim and What to Do with Him, Being a Review of the Work of the Salvation Army Among the Prisoners, Habituals and Criminal Tribes of India. Simla: Liddell’s Printing Works.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, M. (2014). Penal Power and Colonial Rule. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, M. (2016). Postcolonial penality: Liberty and repression in the shadow of independence, India c. 1947. Theoretical Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480615625762.
  7. Brown, M. (2017). The birth of criminology in South Asia, 1765–1947. In S. Shahidullah (Ed.), Crime, Criminal Justice, and the Evolving Science of Criminology in South Asia: India, Pakistan and Bangladesh (pp. 35–54). UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carrington, R., Hogg, R., & Sozzo, M. (2016). Southern criminology. British Journal of Criminology, 56(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azv083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Chatterjee, P. (1986). Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World: A Derivative Discourse. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  11. Chatterjee, P. (1993). The Nation and Its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Connell, R. (2007). Southern Theory: The Global Dynamics of Knowledge in Social Science. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  13. Dados, N., & Connell, R. (2012). Global south. Contexts, 11(1), 12–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504212436479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dirks, N. (1998). Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Fanon, F. (1967). The Wretched of the Earth. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  16. GGA. (1925). Criminology through Indian eyes. Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law, Third Series, 7, 268.Google Scholar
  17. Gleig, G. R.. Rev. (1841). Memoirs of the Life of the of the Right Hon. Warren Hastings, First Governor-General of Bengal (Vol. 1). London: Richard Bentley.Google Scholar
  18. Government of India. (1871). Extract from the Abstract of Proceedings of the Council of the Governor General of India, 3 October 1870. National Archives of India: Government of India (GOI) Legislative Proceedings 58(A).Google Scholar
  19. Guru, G. (2002). How egalitarian are the social sciences in India? Economic and Political Weekly, 37, 5003–5009.Google Scholar
  20. Guru, G., & Sarukkai, S. (2012). The Cracked Mirror: An Indian Debate on Experience and Theory. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Halhed, N. B. (1776). A Compilation of Gentoo Laws, or Ordinations of the Pundits. London.Google Scholar
  22. Harshe, G. (1941). A study of the Mang Garudies under settlement conditions at Mundwa (Poona). Indian Journal of Social Work, 1, 541–552.Google Scholar
  23. Hobbes, T. (1651/1909). Hobbes’s Leviathan, Reprinted from the Edition of 1651. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hutchinson, G. Major (1866). Reformatory Measures Connected with the Treatment of Criminals in India. Lahore: Punjab Printing Company Press.Google Scholar
  25. Inden, R. (1990). Imagining India. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  26. Kaul, H. K., & Tomkins, L. I. (1914). Report on Questions Relating to the Administration of Criminal and Wandering Tribes in the Punjab. Lahore: Superintendent of Government Printing.Google Scholar
  27. Kennedy, M. (1908). Notes on Criminal Classes in the Bombay Presidency: With Appendices Regarding Some Foreign Criminals Who Occasionally Visit the Presidency Including Hints on the Detection of Counterfeit Coin. Bombay: Government Central Press.Google Scholar
  28. Khilani, S. (1997). The Idea of India. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
  29. Locke, J. (1690/1747). A Second Treatise on Government. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  30. Ludden, D. (2002). A brief history of subalternity. In D. Ludden (Ed.), Reading Subaltern Studies: Critical History, Contested Meaning and the Globalization of South Asia (pp. 1–39). London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  31. Malreddy, P. K. (2015). Orientalism, Terrorism, Indigenism: South Asian Readings in Postcolonialism. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Mehta, U. S. (1999). Liberalism and Empire: A Study of Nineteenth Century British Liberal Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. Mill, J. S. (1861). Considerations on Representative Government. London: Parker, Son and Bourn.Google Scholar
  34. Nandy, A. (1998). Exiled at Home. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Nehru, J. (1946). The Discovery of India. London: Meridian Books.Google Scholar
  36. Pillai, K. S. (1924). Principles of Criminology (The Tagore Law Lectures—1920). Madras: Vest and Co.Google Scholar
  37. Radhakrishnan, R. (2003). Theory in an Uneven World. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ramaswamy, S. (1994). Review: Nationalist thought and the colonial world: A derivative discourse. Journal of Asian Studies, 53, 960–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ray, C. P. (1903). A History of Hindu Chemistry (Vol. 1). Calcutta: The Bengal Chemical and Pharmaceutical Works Ltd.Google Scholar
  40. Ray, C. P. (1909). A History of Hindu Chemistry (Vol. 2). Calcutta: The Bengal Chemical and Pharmaceutical Works Ltd.Google Scholar
  41. Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  42. Schwartz, H. (2010). Constructing the Criminal Tribe in Colonial India: Acting Like a Thief. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Seeley, J. R. (1883/1914). The Expansion of England. London: Macmillan and CoGoogle Scholar
  44. Sen, P. K. (1932). From Punishment to Prevention. London: Humphrey Milford.Google Scholar
  45. Sen, P. K. (1943). Penology Old and New. London and Calcutta: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
  46. Sengoopta, C. (2003). Imprint of the Raj: How Fingerprinting was Born in Colonial India. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  47. Shahidullah, S. (Ed.). (2017). Crime, Criminal Justice, and the Evolving Science of Criminology in South Asia: India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  48. Skaria, A. (2014). Can the Dalit articulate a universal position? The intellectual, the social and the writing of history. Social History, 39, 340–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071022.2014.944424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Spivak, G. C. (2004). Righting wrongs. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 103, 523–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Spry, H. H. (1833). Some account of the gang-murderers of central India, commonly called Thugs; accompanying the skulls of seven of them. The Phrenological Journal, 8, 511–524.Google Scholar
  51. Unnithan, N. P. (Ed.). (2013). Crime and Criminal Justice in India. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Visweswaran, K. (1996). Small speeches, subaltern gender: Nationalist ideology and its historiography. In S. Amin & D. Chakrabarty (Eds.), Subaltern Studies IX: Writings on South Asian History and Society (pp. 83–125). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Wagner, K. (2009). Stranglers and Bandits: A Historical Anthology of Thuggee. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Human Rights Instruments

  1. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007)Google Scholar
  2. Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen (1789)Google Scholar
  3. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Brown
    • 1
  1. 1.School of LawUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations