Advertisement

Male Violence Against Women in the Global South: What We Know and What We Don’t Know

  • Walter S. DeKeseredy
  • Amanda Hall-Sanchez
Chapter

Abstract

Most of the empirical and theoretical work on violence against women has thus far centered on the plight of women who live in the Global North. The main objective of this chapter, then, is to contribute to the advancement of southern criminology by examining what social scientists know about various types of woman abuse in the Global South. Here, we answer these questions: What do we know? How do we know it? What are the next steps? All the answers are heavily informed by feminist ways of knowing, and the answers to the third question emphasize new empirical and theoretical directions.

Keywords

Global South Violence against women Feminism Gender 

References

  1. Adams, D. (2007). Why Do They Kill? Men Who Murder Their Intimate Partners. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bancroft, L. (2002). Why Does He Do That? Inside the Minds of Angry and Controlling Men. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  3. Barrett, M. (1980). Women’s Oppression Today: Problems in Marxist Feminist Analysis. London: Thetford.Google Scholar
  4. Carrington, K. (2015). Feminism and Global Justice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Carrington, K., Hogg, R., & Sozzo, M. (2015). Southern criminology. British Journal of Criminology, 56(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azv083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen, L., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collins, V. (2016). State Crime, Women and Gender. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Currier, A. (2012). Out in Africa: LGBT Organizing in Namibia and South Africa. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Currier, A., & Migraine-George, T. (2016). Lesbian/female same-sex sexualities in Africa. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 21(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/10894160.2016.1146031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dalton, M. (2012, January 29). Shafia jury finds all guilty of 1st-degree murder. CBC News Montreal. Retrieved January 29, 2012, from www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/story/2012/01/29/shafia-sunday.html
  11. DeKeseredy, W. (1988a). Woman Abuse in Dating Relationships: The Role of Male Peer Support. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.Google Scholar
  12. DeKeseredy, W. (1988b). Woman abuse in dating relationships: The relevance of social support theory. Journal of Family Violence, 1(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeKeseredy, W. (2017). Explaining campus violence against women: An examination of unhealthy masculinity and male peer support. In C. Kaukinen, M. Miller, & R. Powers (Eds.), Addressing Violence Against Women on College Campuses (pp. 45–65). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  14. DeKeseredy, W., Dragiewicz, M., & Schwartz, M. (2017). Abusive Endings: Separation and Divorce Violence Against Women. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. DeKeseredy, W., Hall-Sanchez, A., Dragiewicz, M., & Rennison, C. (2016). Intimate violence against women in rural communities. In J. Donnermeyer (Ed.), The Routledge International Handbook of Rural Criminology (pp. 171–179). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. DeKeseredy, W., Donnermeyer, J., Schwartz, M., Tunnell, K., & Hall, M. (2007). Thinking critically about rural gender relations: Toward a rural masculinity crisis/male peer support model of separation/divorce sexual assault. Critical Criminology, 15, 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-007-9038-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. DeKeseredy, W., Hall-Sanchez, A., & Nolan, J. (in press). College campus sexual assault: The contribution of peers’ pro-abuse informational support and attachments to abusive peers. Violence Against Women.Google Scholar
  18. DeKeseredy, W., & MacLeod, L. (1997). Woman Abuse: A Sociological Story. Toronto: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  19. DeKeseredy, W., & Rennison, C. (2013). New directions in the social scientific study of separation/divorce assault. In R. Richards & J. Tauri (Eds.), Crime, Justice and Social Democracy: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference, 2013 (Vol. 1, pp. 47–57). Brisbane, QLD: Crime and Justice Research Centre, Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology.Google Scholar
  20. DeKeseredy, W., Rogness, M., & Schwartz, M. (2004). Separation/divorce sexual assault: The current state of social scientific knowledge. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9(6), 675–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2003.08.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. DeKeseredy, W., & Schwartz, M. (2009). Dangerous Exits: Escaping Abusive Relationships in Rural America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  22. DeKeseredy, W., & Schwartz, M. (2013). Male Peer Support and Violence Against Women: The History and Verification of a Theory. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  23. DeKeseredy, W., & Schwartz, M. (2016). Thinking sociologically about image-based sexual abuse: The contribution of male peer support theory. Sexualization, Media, & Society, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2374623816684692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Donnermeyer, J. (2012). Rural crime and critical criminology. In W. DeKeseredy & M. Dragiewicz (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Critical Criminology (pp. 290–301). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Donnermeyer, J., & DeKeseredy, W. (2014). Rural Criminology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Edwards, K., Probst, D., Tansill, E., Dixon, K., Bennet, S., & Gidycz, C. (2014). In their own words: A content-analytic study of college women’s resistance to sexual assault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(14), 2527–2547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513520470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Eisenstein, Z. (1980). Capitalist Patriarchy and the Case for Socialist Feminism. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  28. Ellis, D., & DeKeseredy, W. (1997). Rethinking estrangement, interventions, and intimate femicide. Violence Against Women, 3(6), 590–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801297003006003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Garcia-Moreno, C., Jansen, H., Ellsberg, M., Heise, L., & Watts, C. (2005). WHO Multi-Country Study on Women’s Health and Domestic Violence Against Women. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  30. Gill, A. (2014). Introduction: ‘Honour’ and ‘honour’-based violence: Challenging common assumptions. In A. Gill, C. Strange, & K. Roberts (Eds.), ‘Honour’ Killing and Violence: Theory, Policy and Practice (pp. 1–23). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Goodmark, L. (2011). State, national, and international legal initiatives to address violence against women: A survey. In C. Renzetti, J. Edleson, & R. Kennedy Bergen (Eds.), Sourcebook on Violence Against Women (2nd ed., pp. 191–208). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hashimi, S. (2013, January 29). Opinion: Crimes against women have no religion. The Montreal Gazzette. Retrieved January 29, 2013, from http://www.montrealgazette.com/life/opinion+crimes+against+women+know+religion/7884228/story.html
  34. Jakobsen, H. (2016a). How violence constitutes order: Consent, coercion, and censure in Tanzania. Violence Against Women. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780126678091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jakobsen, H. (2016b). Community law enforcement in rural Tanzania. In J. Donnermeyer (Ed.), The Routledge International Handbook of Rural Criminology (pp. 409–417). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Johnson, H., Ollus, N., & Nevala, S. (2008). Violence Against Women: An International Perspective. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. Khalafzai, R. (2008). Female genital mutilation. Children’s Health Ethics Bulletin, 14, 1–4.Google Scholar
  38. Krug, E., Dahlberg, L., Mercy, J., Zwi, A., & Lozano, R. (Eds.). (2002). Promotion, Yucatan, Mexico. World Report on Violence and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  39. Machado, C., Dias, A., & Coelho, C. (2010). Culture and wife abuse: An overview of theory, research, and practice. In S. Shohm, P. Knepper, & M. Kett (Eds.), International Handbook of Victimology (pp. 639–668). London: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Matebeni, Z. (2009). Feminizing lesbians, degendering transgender men: A model for building lesbian feminist thinkers and leaders in Africa? Souls, 11, 347–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McGlynn, C., & Rackley, E. (2016). Not ‘revenge porn,’ but abuse: Let’s call it image-based sexual abuse. Inherently Human: Critical Perspectives on Law, Gender & Sexuality, 41. Retrieved July 15, 2016, from https://inherentlyhuman.wordpress.com/2016/02/15/not-revenge-porn-but-abuse-lets-call-it-image-base-sexual-abuse
  42. Morgan, M. (1997). Female genital mutilation: An issue on the doorstep of the American medical community. Journal of Legal Medicine, 18(1), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/01947649709511028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Morgan, R., & Wieringa, S. (Eds.). (2005). Tommy Boys, Lesbian Men, and Ancestral Wives. Johannesburg: Jacana Media.Google Scholar
  44. Mujica, A., & Ayala, A. (2008). Femicide in Morelos: An issue on public health. Paper presented at the 9th World Health Organization’s World Conference on Injury Prevention and Safety, 15–18 March, Merida, Mexico.Google Scholar
  45. Navarro, J., Clevenger, S., & Marcum, C. (Eds.). (2016). The Intersection Between Intimate Partner Abuse, Technology, and Cybercrime: Examining the Virtual Enemy. Durham, NC: Carolina University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Nelson, D. (2012, October 15). Indian baby suffers horrendous burns in shocking dowry dispute. The Telegraph. Retrieved January 16, 2017, from www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/india/9609623/Indian-baby-suffers-horrendous-burns-in-shocking-dowry-dispute.html
  47. Powell, A., & Henry, N. (2015). Digital Harassment and Abuse of Adult Australians: A Summary Report. RMIT University. Retrieved July 25, 2016, from https://research.techandme.com.au/wp-content/uploads/REPORT_AustraliansExperiencesofDigitalHarassmentand Abuse.pdf
  48. Rennison, C., DeKeseredy, W., & Dragiewicz, M. (2012). Urban, suburban, and rural variations in separation/divorce rape/sexual assault. Feminist Criminology, 7(4), 282–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085111435660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rennison, C., DeKeseredy, W., & Dragiewicz, M. (2013). Intimate relationship status variations in violence against women: Urban, Suburban, and rural differences. Violence Against Women, 19(11), 1312–1330. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801213514487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Richards, T. (2016). An updated review of institutions of higher education’s responses to sexual assaults: Results for a nationally representative sample. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516658757.
  51. Sampson, R., & Groves, W. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94(4), 774–802. https://doi.org/10.1086/229068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sampson, R., Raudenbush, S., & Earls, F. (1998). Neighborhood Collective Efficacy: Does It Help Reduce Violence? Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  53. Sev’er, A. (2013). Patriarchal Murders of Women. Lewiston, NY: Mellen Press.Google Scholar
  54. Smith, M. (1987). The incidence and prevalence of woman abuse in Toronto. Violence and Victims, 2(3), 173–187.Google Scholar
  55. Smith, M. (1990). Patriarchal ideology and wife beating: A test of a feminist hypothesis. Violence and Victims, 5(2), 257–273.Google Scholar
  56. Stevenson Allen, A. (2015). Violence and Desire in Brazilian Lesbian Relationships. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  57. Theron, L. (2013). Does the label fit. In S. Ekine & H. Abba (Eds.), Queer African Reader (pp. 316–327). Dakar, Senegal: Pambazuka.Google Scholar
  58. True, J. (2012). The Political Economy of Violence Against Women. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ursel, E. (1986). The state and the maintenance of patriarchy: A case study of family labor and welfare legislation. In J. Dickinson & B. Russell (Eds.), Family, Economy and State (pp. 150–191). Toronto: Garamond.Google Scholar
  60. Vargas Martin, M., Garcia-Ruiz, M., & Edwards, A. (2011). Preface. In M. Vargas Martin, M. Garcia-Ruiz, & A. Edwards (Eds.), Technology for Facilitating Humanity and Combating Social Deviations (pp. xxii–xxvii). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wacquant, L. (1997). Three pernicious premises in the study of the American ghetto. International Journal or Urban and Regional Research, 21(2), 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Warner, J., & Campbell, D. (2000). Supply response in an agrarian economy with non-symmetric gender relations. World Development, 28, 1327–1340. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00015-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. White, J., Koss, M., & Kazdin, A. (Eds.). (2011). Violence Against Women and Children: Mapping the Terrain. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  64. World Health Organization (WHO). (2014, February). Female genital mutilation. Fact Sheet 241. Retrieved January 14, 2017, from www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs241/en

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walter S. DeKeseredy
    • 1
  • Amanda Hall-Sanchez
    • 2
  1. 1.West Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA
  2. 2.Department of Social SciencesFairmont State UniversityFairmontUSA

Personalised recommendations