Advertisement

The Asian Criminological Paradigm and How It Links Global North and South: Combining an Extended Conceptual Tool box from the North with Innovative Asian Contexts

  • Jianhong Liu
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter reviews the development of Asian criminology under the framework of the Asian Criminological Paradigm (Liu, Asian Journal of Criminology, 4(1), 1–9, 2009). I primarily review the conceptual and theoretical developments, to suggest strategies that can contribute to the task of bridging the gap between global North and South. Asian criminology has expanded the theoretical tool box originally developed in the global North through the strategies of transportation of theories, elaboration of theories, and proposing new concepts and theories based on the empirical grounds of Asian contexts.

Keywords

Asian criminology Global North Southern criminology Comparative criminology Non-Western Criminology theory 

References

  1. Aas, K. F. (2012). ‘The Earth is one by the world is not’: Criminological theory and its geopolitical divisions. Theoretical Criminology, 16(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1362480611433433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agnew, R. (1992). Foundations for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01093.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agnew, R. (2006). General strain theory: Current status and directions for future research. In F. T. Cullen, J. P. Wright, & K. R. Blevins (Eds.), Taking Stock: The Status of Criminological Theory (pp. 101–123). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  4. Agnew, R. (2014). The origin of strains: Why certain events and conditions are disliked. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, 19–22 November, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  5. Amelang, K., & Beck, S. (2010). Comparison in the wild and more disciplined usages of an epistemic practice. In T. Scheffer & J. Niewohner (Eds.), Thick Comparison: Reviving the Ethnographic Aspiration (pp. 155–180). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson, T. L., & Bennett, R. R. (1996). Development, gender, and crime: The scope of the routine activities approach. Justice Quarterly, 13(1), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829600092811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bao, W.-N., Haas, A., Chen, X., & Pi, Y. (2014). Repeated strains, social control, social learning, and delinquency: Testing an integrated model of general strain theory in China. Youth & Society, 46(3), 402–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X11436189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bao, W.-N., Haas, A., & Pi, Y. (2007). Life strain, coping, and delinquency in the People’s Republic of China: An empirical test of general strain theory from a matching perspective in social support. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X06294428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bennett, R. R. (1991). Routine activities: A Cross-national assessment of a criminological perspective. Social Forces, 70, 147–163. https://doi.org/10.2307/2580066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Belknap, J. (2015). The expansion of Asian criminology and how it is advancing criminology research and crime control. Keynote speech at 7th Annual Conference of the Asian Criminological Society, 26–27 June. Hong Kong, China: City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  11. Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, Shame, and Reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Braithwaite, J. (2015). Rethinking criminology through radical diversity in Asian reconciliation. Asian Criminology, 10(3), 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-014-9200-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carrington, K. (2015). Feminism and Global Justice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Carrington, K., Hogg, R., & Sozzo, M. (2016). Southern criminology. British Journal of Criminology, 56(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azv083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cheung, C.-K., Ngai, N.-P., & Ngai, S. S.-Y. (2007). Family strain and adolescent delinquency in two Chinese cities, Guangzhou and Hong Kong. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 16(5), 626–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-006-9112-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cheung, N. W. T. (2014). Low self-control and co-occurrence of gambling with substance use and delinquency among Chinese adolescents. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30(1), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-012-9351-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cheung, N. W. T., & Cheung, Y. W. (2008). Self-control, social factors, and delinquency: A test of the general theory of crime among adolescents in Hong Kong. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(4), 412–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-007-9218-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cheung, N. W. T., & Cheung, Y. W. (2010). Strain, self-control, and gender differences in delinquency among Chinese adolescents: Extending general strain theory. Sociological Perspectives, 53(3), 321–345. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2010.53.3.321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cheung, Y. W. (1997). Family, school, peer, and media predictors of adolescent deviant behavior in Hong Kong. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26(5), 569–596. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024534022895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chui, W. H., & Chan, H. C. O. (2013). The gendered analysis of self-control on theft and violent delinquency: An examination of Hong Kong adolescent population. Crime & Delinquency, 62(12), 1648–1677. https://doi.org/10.1177/001112871247099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Clark, D. (Ed.). (2012). Comparative Law and Society. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  22. Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Connell, R. (2007). Southern Theory: The Global Dynamics of Knowledge in Social Science. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  24. Cottee, S. (2014). We need to talk about Mohammad: Criminology, theistic violence and the murder of Theo van Gogh. British Journal of Criminology, 54(6), 981–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cotterrell, R. (2012). Comparative sociology of law. In D. Clark (Ed.), Comparative Law and Society (pp. 39–60). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  26. Cretacci, M. A., Rivera, C. J., & Ding, F. (2009). Self-control and Chinese deviance: A look behind the bamboo curtain. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 4(2), 131–143.Google Scholar
  27. Darian-Smith, E. (2013). Laws and Societies in Global Contexts: Contemporary Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Davis, C., Tang, C., & Ko, J. (2004). The impact of peer, family and school on delinquency: A study of at-risk Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong. International Social Work, 47(4), 489–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872804046255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Engel, C. (2012). Low Self-Control as a Source of Crime. Bonn, Germany: Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.Google Scholar
  30. Gingrich, A., & Fox, R. (Eds.). (2002). Anthropology by Comparison. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Gottfredson, M. R. (2006). The empirical status of control theory in criminology. In F. T. Cullen, J. P. Wright, & K. R. Blevins (Eds.), Taking Stock: The Status of Criminological Theory (pp. 77–100). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  32. Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Jiang, S., Land, K. C., & Wang, J. (2013). Social ties, collective efficacy and perceived neighborhood property crime in Guangzhou, China. Asian Journal of Criminology, 8(3), 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-013-9167-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jo, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2012). The stability of self-control: A group-based approach. Asian Journal of Criminology, 7(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-012-9128-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Johnson, D. T. (2002). The Japanese Way of Justice: Prosecuting Crime in Japan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kitayama, S., & Uchida, Y. (2005). Interdependent agency: An alternative system for action. In R. M. Sorrentino, C. Dov, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Culture and Social Behavior: The Ontario Symposium (10th ed., pp. 137–164). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  37. Lauritsen, J. L. (2001). The social ecology of violent victimization: Individual and contextual effects in the NCVS. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 17(1), 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leavitt, G. (1990). Relativism and cross-cultural criminology: A critical analysis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 27(5), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427890027001002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lilly, J. R., Cullen, F. T., & Ball, R. A. (2011). Criminological Theory: Context and Consequences (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: California.Google Scholar
  40. Lin, W.-H. (2012). General strain theory in Taiwan: A latent growth curve modeling approach. Asian Journal of Criminology, 7(1), 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Liu J (2005) Predicting recidivism in a communitarian society: China. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology (SSCI) 49(4): 392–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X04272852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Liu, J. (2007). Principles of restorative justice and Confucian philosophy in China. European Forum for Restorative Justice, 8(1), 2–3.Google Scholar
  43. Liu, J. (2009). Asian Criminology—Challenges, opportunities and directions. Asian Journal of Criminology, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-009-9066-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Liu, J. (2011a). Asian paradigm of criminology. Paper presented at 3rd Annual Conference of the Asian Criminological Society, 15–19 December, Taipei, Taiwan.Google Scholar
  45. Liu, J. (2013). Asian paradigm and access to justice. Keynote speech at the Fifth Annual Conference of Asian Criminological Society, 14–16 April. Mumbai, India: Tata Institute of Social Sciences.Google Scholar
  46. Liu, J. (2014). Culture and criminal justice—A theory of relational justice. Keynote address at the 6th Annual Conference of Asian Criminological Society, 27–29 June, Osaka, JapanGoogle Scholar
  47. Liu, J. (2015). The roots of restorative justice: Universal process or from the West to the East? Acta Crimologiae et Medicinae Legalis Japonica, 81(2), 1–14.Google Scholar
  48. Liu, J. (2016). Asian paradigm and access to justice. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 32(3), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986216656681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Liu, J., Hebenton, B., & Jou, S. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook of Asian Criminology. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  50. Liu, J., & Palermo, G. B. (2009). Restorative justice and Chinese traditional legal culture in the context of contemporary Chinese criminal justice reform. Asia Pacific Journal of Police and Criminal Justice, 7(1), 49–68.Google Scholar
  51. Liu, R. X. (2011b). Strain as a moderator of the relationship between parental attachment and delinquent participation: A China study. International Criminal Justice Review, 21(4), 427–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ma, H. K., Shek, D. T. L., Cheung, P. C., & Tam, K. K. (2002). A longitudinal study of peer and teacher influences on prosocial and antisocial behavior of Hong Kong Chinese adolescents. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 30(2), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2002.30.2.157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mattei, U. (2006). Comparative law and critical legal studies. In M. Reimann & R. R. Zimmerman (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (pp. 815–836). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Merry, S. (2014). Inequality and rights: Commentary on Michael McCann’s ‘The unbearable lightness of rights’. Law and Society Review, 48(2), 285–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Messner, S. F. (2014). Social institutions, theory development, and the promise of comparative criminological research. Asian Journal of Criminology, 9(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-013-9175-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Messner, S. F. (2015). When West meets East: Generalizing theory and expanding the conceptual toolkit of criminology. Journal of Asian Criminology, 10(2), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-014-9197-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Messner, S. F., Zhou, L., Zhang, L., & Liu, J. (2007). Risks of criminal victimization in contemporary urban China: An application of lifestyle/routine activities theory. Justice Quarterly, 24(3), 496–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820701485429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nelken, D. (2010). Comparative Criminal Justice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  59. Ngai, N.-P., & Cheung, C.-K. (2005). Predictors of the likelihood of delinquency: A study of marginal youth in Hong Kong, China. Youth & Society, 36(4), 445–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X04265090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pratt, T. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38(3), 931–964. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2000.tb00911.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pratt, T. C., Cullen, F. T., Sellers, C. S., Winfree, L. T., Jr., Madensen, T. D., Daigle, L. E., et al. (2010). The empirical status of social learning theory: A meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly, 27(6), 765–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820903379610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Reimann, M., & Zimmerman, R. (Eds.). (2006). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Sampson, R. J. (2015). Crime and the life course in a changing world: Insights from Chicago and implications for global criminology. Asian Journal of Criminology, 10(4), 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-015-9220-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schulz, S. (2006). Beyond Self-Control: Analysis and Critique of Gottfredson & Hirschi’s General Theory of Crime (1990): Some Considerations on Theory Construction and Theoretical Integration in Positivist/Etiological Criminology. Berlin, Germany: Duncker & Humboldt.Google Scholar
  65. Stein, R. E. (2010). The utility of country structure: A cross-national multilevel analysis of property and violent victimization. International Criminal Justice Review, 20(1), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057567710361718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Takagi, D., & Kawachi, I. (2014). Neighborhood social heterogeneity and crime victimization in Japan: Moderating effects of social networks. Asian Journal of Criminology, 9(4), 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-014-9191-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. van Kesteren, J., John, P. M., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2001). Criminal Victimization in Seventeen Industrialized Countries: Key Findings from the 2000 International Crime Victims Survey. The Hague: WODC.Google Scholar
  68. van Wilsem, J., de Graaf, N. D., & Karin, W. (2002). Variations in cross-national victimization. In N. Paul (Ed.), Crime Victimization in Comparative Perspective: Results from the International Crime Victims Survey, 1989–2000 (pp. 119–140). The Netherlands: Boom Juridische uitgevers.Google Scholar
  69. Walklate, S. (2015). Whither criminology: Its global future(s)? Keynote address at the 7th Annual Conference of the Asian Criminological Society, 26–27 June. Hong Kong, China: City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  70. Wang, G. T., Hengrui, Q., Hong, S., & Zhang, J. (2002). Adolescent social bond, self-control and deviant behavior in China. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 39(1), 52–68.Google Scholar
  71. Wikström, P.-O. H., Oberwittler, D., Treiber, K., & Hardie, B. (2012). Breaking Rules: The Social and Situational Dynamics off Young People’s Urban Crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Wong, D. S. W. (2001). Pathways to delinquency in Hong Kong and Guangzhou (South China). International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 10(1/2), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2001.9747893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Young, J. (2011). The Criminological Imagination. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  74. Zehr, H. (1990). Changing Lenses: A New focus for Crime and Justice. Scottsdale, PA: Herald Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jianhong Liu
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MacauZhuhai ShiChina

Personalised recommendations