Identities and Vulnerabilities: The Ukraine Crisis and the Securitisation of the EU-Russia Gas Trade

  • Marco Siddi
Part of the Energy, Climate and the Environment book series (ECE)


European discourses increasingly frame EU-Russia gas trade as a security issue. The securitisation of the topic is particularly strong in East-Central European countries. The chapter applies realist and social constructivist theory to examine the securitisation of discourses. It argues that realist theory does not provide a satisfactory explanation because most of the alleged threats to EU energy security are constructed discursively and are not based on actual vulnerabilities. As a social constructivist approach suggests, identity plays an important role in this process. The Ukraine conflict has strengthened perceptions of Russia as a threatening Other, which were deeply rooted especially in the national identities of East-Central European countries. This has affected perceptions of energy trade too, which has thus become the subject of acrimonious political contestation.


  1. Auer, Stefan. 2015. Carl Schmitt in the Kremlin: The Ukraine Crisis and the Return of Geopolitics. International Affairs 91 (5): 953–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagger, Thomas. 2016. Statements at the Seminar, “Europe’s New Political Engine: Germany’s Role in the EU’s Foreign and Security Policy”. April 15. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
  3. Balzacq, Thierry. 2010. Constructivism and Securitisation Studies. In The Routledge Handbook of Security Studies, ed. Myriam Dunn Cavelty and Victor Mauer, 56–72. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Boersma, Tim. 2015. Forget Russia, European Energy Security Begins at Home. Brookings, October 28. Accessed 4 July 2015.
  5. Brubaker, Rogers, and Frederick Cooper. 2000. Beyond ‘Identity’. Theory and Society 29: 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver, and Jaap de Wilde. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  7. Casier, Tom. 2011. The Rise of Energy to the Top of the EU-Russia Agenda: From Interdependence to Dependence? Geopolitics 16 (3): 536–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Castle, Stephen. 2006. Poles Angry at Pipeline Pact. The Independent, May 1.Google Scholar
  9. Dickel, Ralf, et al. 2014. Reducing European Dependence on Russian Gas: Distinguishing Natural Gas Security from Geopolitics. OIES Paper 92. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.Google Scholar
  10. Dreger, Christian, Konstantin A. Kholodilin, Dirk Ulbricht, and Jarko Fidrmuc. 2016. Between the Hammer and the Anvil: The Impact of Economic Sanctions and Oil Prices on Russia’s Ruble. Journal of Comparative Economics 44 (2): 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ehin, Piret, and Eiki Berg. 2016. Incompatible Identities? Baltic-Russian Relations and the EU as an Arena for Identity Conflict. In Identity and Foreign Policy. Baltic Russian Relations and European Integration, ed. Piret Ehin and Eiki Berg, 1–14. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Fischer, Severin. 2016. Nord Stream 2: Trust in Europe. CSS Policy Perspectives 4(4). ETH Zurich: 1–4.Google Scholar
  13. France 24. 2017. Poland and Ukraine Warn Could Russia Use Gas “Blackmail”. March 15. Accessed 27 Mar 2017.
  14. German, Tracey. 2009. Pipeline Politics: Georgia and Energy Security. Small Wars and Insurgencies 20 (2): 344–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Godzimirski, Jakub. 2009. Energy Security and the Politics of Identity. In Political Economy of Energy in Europe: Forces of Fragmentation and Integration, ed. Gunnar Fermann, 173–206. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts.Google Scholar
  16. Goldthau, Andreas, and Jan Martin Witte. 2009. Back to the Future or Forward to the Past? Strengthening Markets and Rules for Effective Global Energy Governance. International Affairs 85 (2): 373–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harding, Luke. 2010. Ukraine Extends Lease for Russia’s Black Sea Fleet. Guardian, April 21. Accessed 10 Jan 2017.
  18. Henderson, James, and Tatiana Mitrova. 2015. The Political and Commercial Dynamics of Russia’s Gas Export Strategy. OIES Paper no. 102. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.Google Scholar
  19. Herman, Robert. 1996. Identity, Norms and National Security: The Soviet Foreign Policy Revolution and the End of the Cold War. In The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, ed. Peter Katzenstein, 271–316. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Högselius, Per. 2013. Red Gas. Russia and the Origins of European Energy Dependence. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Hopf, Ted. 2002. Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies, Moscow, 1955 and 1999. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Johnston, Alastair Iain. 1999. Realism(s) and Chinese Security Policy in the Post-Cold War Period. In Unipolar Politics. Realism and State Strategies After the Cold War, ed. E. Kapstein and M. Mastanduno, 261–318. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kaczynski, Jaroslaw. 2006. Interview with Handelsblatt, ‘Man darf nicht mit zweierlei Maß messen’. October 30. Accessed 27 Mar 2017.
  24. Klare, Michael T. 2009. Rising Powers, Shrinking Planet. The New Geopolitics of Energy. New York: Holt Paperbacks.Google Scholar
  25. Kropatcheva, Elena. 2011. Playing Both Ends Against the Middle: Russia’s Geopolitical Energy Games with the EU and Ukraine. Geopolitics 16 (3): 553–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kundera, Milan. 1984. The Tragedy of Central Europe. New York Review of Books 31 (7): 33–38.Google Scholar
  27. Kustova, Irina. 2015. EU-Russia Energy Relations, EU Energy Integration, and Energy Security: The State of the Art and a Roadmap for Future Research. Journal of Contemporary European Research 11 (3): 287–295.Google Scholar
  28. Kuzemko, Caroline, Michael F. Keating, and Andreas Goldthau. 2015. The Global Energy Challenge: Environment, Development and Security. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. Laine, Veera, Toivo Martikainen, Katri Pynnöniemi, and Sinikukka Saari. 2015. Zugzwang in Slow Motion? The Implications of Russia’s System-Level Crisis. FIIA Analysis no. 6. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
  30. Lebow, Richard Ned. 2008. A Cultural Theory of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Malesevic, Sinisa. 2011. The Chimera of National Identity. Nations and Nationalism 17 (2): 272–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Miller, David. 1997. On Nationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Morozov, Viatcheslav, and Bahar Rumelili. 2012. The External Constitution of European Identity: Russia and Turkey as Europe-Makers. Cooperation and Conflict 47 (1): 28–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Neumann, Iver. 1998. Uses of the Other: The East in European Identity Formation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  35. Pirani, Simon, et al. 2009. The Russo-Ukrainian Gas Dispute of January 2009: A Comprehensive Assessment. OIES Paper 27. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.Google Scholar
  36. Poe, Marshall. 2003. A Distant World: Russian Relations with Europe Before Peter the Great. In Russia Engages the World, 1453–1825, ed. C. Whittaker, 2–23. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Sengupta, Somini, and Neil MacFarquhar. 2015. Vladimir Putin of Russia Calls for Coalition to Fight ISIS. The New York Times, September 27. Accessed 4 July 2016.
  38. Siddi, Marco. 2012. The Russian ‘Other’. The Impact of National Identity Construction on EU-Russia Relations. In Understanding European Neighbourhood Policies: Concepts, Actors, Perceptions, ed. Edmund Ratka and Olga Spaiser, 249–266. Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. ———. 2015. The EU-Russia Gas Relationship: New Projects, New Disputes? FIIA Briefing Paper 183. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
  40. ———. 2016a. German Foreign Policy Towards Russia in the Aftermath of the Ukraine Crisis: A New Ostpolitik? Europe-Asia Studies 68 (4): 665–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. ———. 2016b. The EU’s Energy Union: A Sustainable Path to Energy Security? The International Spectator 51 (1): 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. ———. 2017. National Identities and Foreign Policy in the European Union. The Russia Policy of Germany, Poland and Finland. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  43. Stegen, Karen Smith. 2011. Deconstructing the ‘Energy Weapon’: Russia's Threat to Europe as Case Study. Energy Policy 39 (10): 6505–6513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sytas, Andrius. 2016. EU Leaders Sign Letter Objecting to Nord Stream-2 Gas Link. Reuters, March 16. Accessed 5 July 2016.
  45. Szulecki, Kacper. 2015. Heretical Geopolitics of Central Europe. Dissidents Intellectuals and an Alternative European Order. Geoforum 65: 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tusk, Donald. 2014. A United Europe Can End Russia’s Energy Stranglehold. Financial Times, April 21. Accessed 5 July 2016.
  47. Wæver, Ole. 1995. Securitisation and Desecuritisation. In On Security, ed. Ronnie Lipschutz, 46–86. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Welle, Die. 2016. Polish Foreign Minister Says Russia More Dangerous than IS. April 16. Accessed 27 Mar 2017.
  49. Yafimava, Katja. 2015. European Energy Security and the Role of Russian Gas: Assessing the Feasibility and the Rationale of Reducing Dependence. IAI Working Paper 15/54. Rome: Istituto Affari Internazionali.Google Scholar
  50. Yergin, Daniel. 2006. Ensuring Energy Security. Foreign Policy 85 (2): 69–82.Google Scholar
  51. Zarycki, Tomasz. 2004. Uses of Russia: The Role of Russia in the Modern Polish National Identity. East European Politics and Societies 18 (4): 595–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco Siddi
    • 1
  1. 1.Finnish Institute of International AffairsHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations