Advertisement

Challenges of Austerity and Retrenchment of Gender Equality

  • Tindara Addabbo
  • Elisabeth Klatzer
  • Christa Schlager
  • Paola Villa
  • Paloma de Villota
Chapter

Abstract

Reductions in public spending and the dominance of austerity since 2008 have characterized public policy decisions in Europe. Decisions on resource allocation, public service design and reform, changes in social security spending and tax revenue, and in the fiscal rules applied by the EU have significantly affected women’s financial security and autonomy and their political and social status within EU member state countries. With case studies on Spain and Italy, this chapter argues that the entrenched paradigm has disregarded the impact on gender equality and the regressive effects of policy decisions, despite political rhetoric on the enduring importance of advancing gender equality.

References

  1. Addabbo, Tindara. 2014. The Gender Impact of the Financial, Political and Social Crisis. The Case of Italy. In The Impacts of the Crisis on Gender Equality and women’s Wellbeing in EU Mediterranean Countries, ed. United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute. http://www.unicri.it/in_focus/on/vaw_report. Accessed 8 May 2017.
  2. Addabbo, Tindara, Valentina Cardinali, Dino Giovannini, and Sara Mazzucchelli. 2016. Italy Country Note. In 12th International Review of Leave Policies and Related Research 2016, ed. Alison Koslowski, 190–202. London: International Network on Leave Policies and Related Research.Google Scholar
  3. Addabbo, Tindara, Diego Lanzi, and Antonella Picchio. 2010. Gender Budgets: A Capability Approach. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities: A Multi-Disciplinary Journal for People-Centered Development 11 (4): 479–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alarcón, Gloria. 2011. La perspectiva de género en los gastos en infraestructuras públicas: los equipamientos educativos y deportivos en el FEIL-2009. Presupuesto y Gasto Público 64/3. Madrid: Secretaría General de Presupuestos y Gastos. Instituto de Estudios Fiscales.Google Scholar
  5. Alvarez, Ignacio, Fernando Luengo, and Jorge Uxó. 2013. Fracturas y Crisis en Europa. Madrid: Clave Intelectual.Google Scholar
  6. Bakker, Isabella. 1994. The Strategic Silence: Gender and Economic Policy. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 2011. Changing Macroeconomic Governance and Gender Orders: The Case of Canada. In Questioning Financial Governance from a Feminist Perspective, ed. Brigitte Young, Isabella Bakker, and Diane Elson, 38–50. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Bengtsson, Mattias, Caroline de la Porte, and Kerstin Jacobsson. 2017. Labour Market Policy Under Conditions of Permanent Austerity: Any Sign of Social Investment? Social Policy & Administration 51 (2): 367–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bettio, Francesca, Marcella Corsi, Carlo D’Ippoliti, Antigone Lyberaki, Manuela Samek Lodovici, and Alina Verashchagina. 2013. The Impact of the Economic Crisis on the Situation of Women and Men and on Gender Equality Policies. Synthesis Report. European Commission, Directorate-General for Justice. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  10. Bieling, Hans-Jürgen. 2011. EU-Verfassungspolitik und Wirtschaftsregierung. Krisenkonstitutionalismus gegen Volkssouveränität und Demokratie. Widerspruch 61 (11): 61–70.Google Scholar
  11. Bordogna, Lorenzo, and Stefano Neri. 2012. Social Dialogue and the Public Services in the Aftermath of the Economic Crisis: Strengthening Partnership in an Era of Austerity in Italy. National Project Report. EC Project Industrial Relations and Social Dialogue, VP/2011/001.Google Scholar
  12. CCOO. 2013. Valoración del Programa Nacional de Reformas para España 2013. Madrid: Secretaría de Acción Sindical y Políticas Sectoriales.Google Scholar
  13. Copelovitch, Mark, Jeffry Frieden, and Stefanie Walter. 2016. The Political Economy of the Euro Crisis. Comparative Political Studies 49 (7): 811–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Council of European Union. 2012. Council Recommendation on Spain’s 2012 National Reform Program and Delivering a Council Opinion on Spain’s Stability Program for 2012–2015. SWD (2012) 310 final. Brussels.Google Scholar
  15. De Henau, Jerome, and Christina Santos. 2011. Gender Analysis of the Changes in Indirect Taxes Introduced by the Coalition Government, 2010–2011. Women’s Budget Group. http://oro.open.ac.uk/33158/1/Indirect_tax_Budget_2011_final_report_June_20.pdf. Accessed 8 May 2017.
  16. De la Porte, Caroline, and Elke Heins. 2015. A New Era of European Integration? Governance of Labour Market and Social Policy Since the Sovereign Debt Crisis. Comparative European Politics 13 (1): 8–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Villota, Paloma. 2016. The Spanish Central Government Budget: Comments in Recent Experience. In Feminist Economics and Public Policy: Reflections on the Work and Impact of Ailsa McKay, ed. Jim Campell and Morag Gillespie. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2017. Aproximación al análisis de la política fiscal durante la crisis desde la perspectiva de género. Revista Economiaz 91:279–293.Google Scholar
  19. De Villota, Paloma, and Susana Vázquez Cupeiro. 2016. The Restructuration of the Spanish Welfare State: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back? In Challenges to European Welfare System, ed. Klaus Schubert, Johanna Kuhlmann, and Paloma De Villota, 171–187. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Duerst-Lahti, Georgia, and Rita Mae Kelly. 1995. Gender, Power, Leadership and Governance. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  21. Elson, Diane. 2002a. International Financial Architecture: A View from the Kitchen. Femina Politica 11 (1): 26–38.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 2002b. Gender Responsive Budget Initiatives: Key Dimensions and Practical Examples. In Gender Budget Initiatives. Strategies, Concepts and Experiences. New York: UNIFEM.Google Scholar
  23. Elson, Diane, and Tanja Warnecke. 2011. IMF Policies and Gender Orders. The Case of the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility. In Questioning Financial Governance from a Feminist Perspective, ed. Brigitte Young, Isabella Bakker, and Diane Elson, 110–131. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. European Parliament. 2012. Analysis of Five National Reform Programmes 2012 Regarding the Pursuit of the Union’s Gender Equality Objectives. PE 462.510, Brussels.Google Scholar
  25. Eurostat. 2014. GDP and Main Components – Current Prices. http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=nama_gdp_c&lang=en. Accessed 15 Apr 2014.
  26. ———. 2017. Expenditure: Main Results. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/-/spr_exp_sum. Accessed 7 May 2017.
  27. Figari, Francesco, and Carlo V. Fiorio. 2015. Fiscal Consolidation Policies in the Context of Italy’s Two Recessions. Fiscal Studies 36 (4): 499–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gabriele, Stefania, and Maria Rosaria Marino. 2016. Il bilancio di genere. Un inquadramento generale. Ufficio Parlamentare di Bilancio, Focus Tematico 7.Google Scholar
  29. Gómez de la Torre, Mónica, and Maria Teresa López. 2010. Impuesto sobre Valor Añadido y Familia en los Presupuestos Generales del Estado de 2010. Fundación Acción Familiar: Madrid.Google Scholar
  30. Gonzalez Gago, Elvira, and Marcelo Segales Kirzner. 2014. Women, Gender Equality and the Economic Crisis in Spain. In Women and Austerity. The Economic Crisis and the Future for Gender Equality, ed. Maria Karamessini and Jill Rubery, 228–247. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Hozić, Aida A., and Jacqui True, eds. 2016. Scandalous Economics. Gender and the Politics of Financial Crises. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. INE, Instituto Nacional de Estadísrica. 2011. Encuesta de empleo del tiempo. http://www.ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/es/operacion.htm?c=Estadistica_C&cid=1254736176815&menu=resultados&idp=1254735976608. Accessed 7 May 2017.
  33. ———. 2016. Tasas de paro por sexo y grupo de edad. http://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Tabla.htm?t=4887&L=0
  34. Isfol. 2013. Rapporto di monitoraggio del mercato del lavoro. 2012. Rome: Isfol.Google Scholar
  35. Istat. 2013. Rapporto annuale sulla situazione del paese 2013. Rome: Istat.Google Scholar
  36. ———. 2015. Come cambia la vita delle donne. 2004–2014. Rome: Istat.Google Scholar
  37. ———. 2016a. Rapporto annuale sulla situazione del paese 2016. Rome: Istat.Google Scholar
  38. Jacquot, Sophie. 2015. Transformations in EU Gender Equality: From Emergence to Dismantling. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Karamessini, Maria, and Jill Rubery, eds. 2014. Women and Austerity. The Economic Crisis and the Future for Gender Equality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Klatzer, Elisabeth, and Christa Schlager 2011. Europäische Wirtschaftsregierung – eine stille neoliberale Revolution. Kurswechsel 1: 61–81.Google Scholar
  41. ———. 2012. Genderdimensionen der neuen EU Economic Governance. Kurswechsel 1: 23-35.Google Scholar
  42. ———. 2014. Gender and Macroeconomics: Economic Governance in the EU – Reconfiguration of Gendered Power Structures and Erosion of Gender Equality. In The Sage Handbook of Feminist Theory, ed. Mary Evans, Clare Hemmings, Marsha Henry, Hazel Johnstone, Sumi Madhok, Ania Plomien, and Sadie Wearing, 483–499. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. ———. 2015. The Big Picture Makes a Big Difference: Taking into Account Changed Framework Conditions for Budgetary Policies at European Level in Gender Responsive Budgeting. Politica Economica/Journal of Economic Policy 31 (2): 135–154.Google Scholar
  44. ———. 2017. The Gendered Nature of Economic Governance Institutions and Policies. A Key Battleground for Gender Equality. In In Towards Gendering Institutionalism Equality in Europe, ed. Heather MacRae and Elaine Weiner. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  45. Kronsell, Annica. 2005. Gender, Power and European Integration Theory. Journal of European Public Policy 12 (6): 1022–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kurz-Scherf, Ingrid, and Alexandra Scheele, eds. 2013. Macht oder ökonomisches Gesetz? Zum Zusammenhang von Krise und Geschlecht. Münster: Dampfboot Verlag.Google Scholar
  47. Lago, Manuel. 2015. Análisis gráfico: recorte en la protección por desempleo en España. Cuadernos de acción sindical. Madrid: CCOO.Google Scholar
  48. Lahey, Kathleen, and Paloma De Villota. 2013. Economic Crisis, Gender Equality, and Policy Responses in Spain and Canada. Feminist Economics 19 (3): 82–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Laparra, Miguel, and Begoña Pérez, eds. 2012. Crisis y fractura social en Europa. Causas y efectos en España. Colección Estudios Sociales No. 35. Barcelona. Obra Social “la Caixa”.Google Scholar
  50. León, Margarita, and Emmanuele Pavolini. 2014. Social Investment’ or Back to ‘Familism’: The Impact of the Economic Crisis on Family and Care Policies in Italy and Spain. South European Society and Politics 19 (3): 353–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lombardo, Emanuela. 2017. The Spanish Gender Regime in the EU Context: Changes and Struggles in Times of Austerity. Gender, Work and Organization 24 (1): 1–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Maione, Valeria. 2014. Consigliere di parità o dame di carità. http://www.ingenere.it. Accessed 7 Oct 2014.
  53. McKay, Ailsa, Jim Campbell, Emily Thomson, and Susanne Ross. 2013. Economic Recession and Recovery in the UK: What’s Gender Got to Do with It? Feminist Economics 19 (3): 108–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Navarro, Vicenc, 2009. El cuarto pilar del Bienestar. El País 15 de octubre de 2009; 11.Google Scholar
  55. Oberndorfer, Lukas. 2014. A New Economic Governance through Secondary Legislation? Analysis and Constitutional Assessment: From New Constitutionalism, Via Authoritarian Constitutionalism to Progressive Constitutionalism. In The Economic and Financial Crisis and Collective Labor Law in Europe, ed. Niklas Bruun, Klaus Lörcher, and Isabelle Schömann, 25–54. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
  56. OECD. 2016. OECD Consumption Tax Trends 2016 – Italy. https://www.oecd.org/tax/consumption/consumption-tax-trends-italy.pdf. Accessed 8 May 2017.
  57. Pavolini, Emmanuele, Margarita Leon, Anna M. Guillén, and Ugo Ascoli. 2015. From Austerity to Permanent Strain. The EU Welfare State Reform in Italy and Spain. Comparative European Politics 13 (1): 56–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Piazzalunga, D., and M.L. Di Tommaso. 2016. The Increase of the Gender Wage Gap in Italy During the 2008–2012 Economic Crisis. IZA Discussion Papers, No. 9931.Google Scholar
  59. Rubery, Jill. 2015. Austerity and the Future for Gender Equality in Europe. ILR Review 68 (4): 715–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sacchi, Stefano, and Jungho Roh. 2016. Conditionality, Austerity and Welfare: Financial Crisis and Its Impact on Welfare in Italy and Korea. Journal of European Social Policy 26 (4): 358–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sauer, Birgit. 2010. Das Geschlecht der Finanz- und Wirtschaftskrise. Kurswechsel 1: 38–46.Google Scholar
  62. Segnana, Maria Luigia, and Paola Villa. 2015. Women and Austerity in Italy. ex æquo 32: 15–32.Google Scholar
  63. Simonazzi, Annamaria. 2015. Italy: Continuity and Change in Welfare State Retrenchment. In The European Social Model in Crisis. Is Europe Losing Its Soul? ed. Daniel Vaughan-Whitehead, 339–385. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  64. Smith, Mark, and Paola Villa. 2010. The Ever-Declining Role of Gender Equality in the European Employment Strategy. Industrial Relations Journal 41 (6): 526–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Verashchagina, Alina, and Marina Capparucci. 2014. Living Through the Crisis in Italy: The Labour Market Experience of Men and Women. In Women and Austerity: The Economic Crisis and the Future for Gender Equality, ed. Maria Karamessini and Jill Rubery, 248–269. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  66. Villa, Paola, and Mark Smith. 2014. Policy in the Time of Crisis: Employment Policy and Gender Equality in Europe. In Women and Austerity: The Economic Crisis and the Future for Gender Equality, ed. Maria Karamessini and Jill Rubery, 273–294. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. ———. 2016. Shifting Labour Supply Groups, Changing Priorities – Gender, the European Employment Strategy and National Policy Responses. Paper Presented at the 40 Years of the Cambridge Journal of Economics Conference, Cambridge, 12–13 July.Google Scholar
  68. Weiner, Elaine, and Heather MacRae. 2014. The Persistent Invisibility of Gender in EU Policy. European Integration online Papers 18(1). Article 3. http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2014-003a.htm
  69. Women’s Budget Group. 2013. The Impact on Women of Budget 2013: A Budget for Inequality and Recession. http://wbg.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/WBG_Budget-Analysis_2013.pdf. Accessed 8 May 2017.
  70. Young, Brigitte, and Helene Schuberth. 2011. The Role of Gender in Governance of the Financial Sector. In Questioning Financial Governance from a Feminist Perspective, ed. Brigitte Young, Isabella Bakker, and Diane Elson, 132–153. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tindara Addabbo
    • 1
  • Elisabeth Klatzer
    • 2
  • Christa Schlager
    • 3
  • Paola Villa
    • 4
  • Paloma de Villota
    • 5
  1. 1.University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
  2. 2.Independent Researcher-Activist and International ConsultantFeminist Economics and Gender Responsive BudgetingViennaAustria
  3. 3.Austrian Chamber of LabourViennaAustria
  4. 4.University of TrentoTrentoItaly
  5. 5.Universidad Complutense de MadridMadirdSpain

Personalised recommendations