Advertisement

Living with “Encantados”: Dances of Poet and Scientist Within the Self

  • Emily Abbey
  • Ana Cecilia Bastos
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture book series (PASCC)

Abstract

Western empiricism may draw a strict boundary between the poet (associated to imagination, subjectivity and emotions) and the scientist (operating on the bases of objectivity and logic). However, poets are simultaneously part of both the poetic and scientific worlds. They transit between the worlds analogously to people who live along the Amazon and São Francisco rivers in Brazil. These people have a relationship with the “Encantados” (“Enchanted ones, mythical shadow-like entities believed to inhabit there). Encantados are parts of the same whole—they are conceived as parallel but mutually influent worlds. So too, phenomena are rich fusions of poetic and scientific modes of thought. Here, we analyze the experience of researchers who live at the boundary of poetry and science, creating poetic movements to enable the scientist to better explore the living world.

References

  1. Bastos, A. C. S., & Rabinovich, E. P. (2009). Realities of living: From poverty to poetry, and beyond. In A. C. S. Bastos & E. P. Rabinovich (Eds.), Living in poverty. Developmental poetics of cultural realities. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Bergson, H. (1913). Time and free will. London: George Allen & Co.Google Scholar
  3. Bruner, J. (1962). On knowing: Essays for the left hand. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Freeman, M. (2011). Toward a poetic science. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 45, 389–396.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Halloy, A., & Servais, V. (2014). Enchanting gods and dolphins: A cross-cultural analysis of uncanny encounters. Ethos, 42(4), 479–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Herbst, D. P. (1995). What happens when we made a distinction: An elementary introduction to co-genetic logic. In T. A. Kindermann & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Development of person-context relations (pp. 67–79). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Hermans, H. J. M. (2001). The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture & Psychology, 7(3), 243–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ochs, E., & Capps, L. (2001). Living narrative. Creating lives in everyday storytelling. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams, and imitation in childhood. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  10. Prigogine, I., & Nicolis, G. (1971). Biological order, structure, and instabilities. Quarterly Journal of Biophysics, 4, 107–148.Google Scholar
  11. Rancière, J. (2005). A partilha do sensível. Estética e política. São Paulo: Exo- experimental and Editora 34.Google Scholar
  12. Rancière, J. (2008). Aesthetic separation, aesthetic community. Scenes from the aesthetic regime of art. Art & Research. A Journal of Ideas, Contexts and Methods. Retrieved July 17, 2016, from http://www.artandresearch.org.uk/v2n1/ranciere.html
  13. Rosa, J. G. (1967/2015). Grande Sertão: Veredas. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira.Google Scholar
  14. Valsiner, J. (2000). Culture and human development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Vygotsky, L. S. (1971). Psychology of art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Vygotsky, L. S., & Luria, A. R. (1930/1994). Tool and symbol in child development. In Van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emily Abbey
    • 1
  • Ana Cecilia Bastos
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Ramapo CollegeMahwahUSA
  2. 2.Federal University of Bahia (UFBA)SalvadorBrazil
  3. 3.Catholic University of Salvador (UCSAL)SalvadorBrazil

Personalised recommendations