An Empire Without an Emperor? The EU and Its Eastern Neighbourhood

  • Tuomas Forsberg
  • Hiski Haukkala
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology book series (PSEPS)


The metaphor of ‘empire’ has been applied not infrequently to the European Union—most notably by Jan Zielonka (2006)—and there is indeed a growing, though not necessarily very well interconnected, body of scholarly literature on the topic (see Behr and Stivachtis 2016; and e.g. Waever 1997; Gravier 2009; Marks 2012). The extent to which the EU has been, or can be interpreted as an ‘empire’ clearly depends on what is meant by the word. It is often used in a negative sense to indicate the ‘imperialist’ ambitions and policies of the ‘Brussels bureaucracy’, allegedly to subjugate its member states, or how the bureaucracy or the leading member states dominate the continent and some other parts of the world, particularly the former European colonies. On the other hand, there are people who see ‘empire’ as a more positive concept, implying the diversity of the constituent units, with multiple loyalties and overlapping authorities. An example of this is Zielonka (2006), who defines the EU as a neo-medieval polity, or Robert Cooper (2002), who sees it as a postmodern one. Those who embrace ‘imperialism’ also stress the civilisational aspect of developed and enlightened imperial communities, though more often this mission is seen in a critical light. Even the EU Commission President, Manuel Barroso, once noted that ‘sometimes I like to compare the EU as a creation to the organisation of empire. We have the dimension of empire’ (Mahony 2007). However, he distanced himself from the negative aspects of the concept by adding ‘what we have is the first non-imperial empire’. Given these loaded meanings, it might be difficult to refer to ‘empire’ as a purely analytical concept. Nevertheless, ‘empire’ can be seen as a vast territorial unit larger than a nation-state, consisting of a centre and peripheries but often without definitive outer borders, or even more nominally as a territorial unit ruled by an emperor. If the EU is an empire in the former sense, it is definitively an empire without an emperor.


  1. Ademmer, E., L. Delcour, and K. Wolczuk. 2016. Beyond Geopolitics: Exploring the Impact of the EU and Russia in the “Contested Neighborhood”. Eurasian Geography and Economics 57 (1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, P. 2009. The New Old World. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  3. Ashton, C. 2013. Message by EU High Representative Catherine Ashton to Maidan Protesters, December 11. Accessed 6 June 2017.
  4. Bechev, D., and K. Nicolaïdis. 2010. From Policy to Polity: Can the EU’s Special Relations with Its “Neighbourhood” Be Decentered? Journal of Common Market Studies 48 (3): 475–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Behr, H. 2007. The European Union in the Legacies of Imperial Rule? EU Accession Politics Viewed from a Historical Comparative Perspective. European Journal of International Relations 13 (2): 239–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Behr, H., and Y.A. Stivachtis, eds. 2016. Revisiting the European Union as Empire. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Bicchi, F. 2006. “Our Size Fits All”: Normative Power Europe and the Mediterranean. Journal of European Public Policy 13 (2): 286–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Börzel, T., and B. Lebanidze. 2017. “The Transformative Power of Europe” Beyond Enlargement: The EU’s Performance in Promoting Democracy in Its Neighbourhood. East European Politics 33 (1): 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Börzel, T., and V. van Hüllen. 2014. One Voice, One Message, But Conflicting Goals: Cohesiveness and Consistency in the European Neighbourhood Policy. Journal of European Public Policy 21 (7): 1033–1049.Google Scholar
  10. Bouris, D., and T. Schumacher, eds. 2017. The Revised European Neighbourhood Policy: Continuity and Change in EU Foreign Policy. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  11. Browning, C., and P. Joenniemi. 2008. Geostrategies of the European Neighbourhood Policy. European Journal of International Relations 14 (3): 519–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buckley, N., and R. Olearchyk. 2013. Ukraine Refuses to Sign Up to Europe deal. Financial Times, November 29. Accessed 6 June 2017.
  13. Busygina, I. 2017. Russia–EU Relations and the Common Neighborhood: Coercion vs. Authority. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Bull, H. 1982. Civilian Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms? Journal of Common Market Studies 21 (2): 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burlyuk, O. 2017. The ‘Oops!’ of EU Engagement Abroad: Analyzing Unintended Consequences of EU External Action. Journal of Common Market Studies55 (5): 1009–1025.Google Scholar
  16. Buscaneanu, S. 2016. Regime Dynamics in EU’s Eastern Neighbourhood: EU Democracy Promotion, International Influences, and Domestic Contexts. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Casier, T. 2011. To Adopt or Not to Adopt: Explaining Selective Rule Transfer under the European Neighbourhood Policy. Journal of European Integration 33 (1): 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. ———. 2016. From Logic of Competition to Conflict: Understanding the Dynamics of EU-Russia Relations. Contemporary Politics 22 (3): 376–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Christou, G. 2010. European Union Security Logics to the East: The European Neighbourhood Policy and the Eastern Partnership. European Security 19 (3): 413–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cooper, R. 2002. The New Liberal Imperialism. The Observer, April 7.Google Scholar
  21. Damro, C. 2012. Market Power Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 19 (5): 682–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eder, F., and C. B. Schiltz. 2014. Russland wird schwächer: José Manuel Barroso hält einen Zusammenbruch für verkraftbar. Welt am Sonntag, December 21.Google Scholar
  23. European Commission. 2004. European Neighbourhood Policy, Strategy Paper, May 12, COM (2004) 373 final, SEC (2004) 564–570.Google Scholar
  24. European Council. 2003. A Secure Europe in a Better World: European Security Strategy, Brussels, December 12.Google Scholar
  25. Forsberg, T., and H. Haukkala. 2016. The European Union and Russia. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gehring, T., K. Urbanski, and S. Oberthür. 2017. The European Union as an Inadvertent Great Power: EU Actorness and the Ukraine Crisis. Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (4): 727–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grabbe, H. 2006. The EU’s Transformative Power: Europeanization Through Conditionality in Central and Eastern Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gravier, M. 2009. The Next European Empire. European Societies 11 (5): 627–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Haukkala, H. 2008. The European Union as a Regional Normative Hegemon: The Case of European Neighbourhood Policy. Europe-Asia Studies 60 (9): 1601–1622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. ———. 2016. A Perfect Storm: Or What Went Wrong and What Went Right for the EU in Ukraine. Europe-Asia Studies 68 (4): 653–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. ———. 2017. The EU’s Regional Normative Hegemony Encounters Hard Realities: The Revised European Neighbourhood Policy and the Ring of Fire. In The Revised European Neighbourhood Policy: Continuity and Change in EU Foreign Policy, ed. D. Bouris and T. Schumacher. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  32. Havel, V. 1994. A Call for Sacrifice. Foreign Affairs 73 (2): 2–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Higashino, A. 2004. For the Sake of ‘Peace and Security’? The Role of Security in the European Union Enlargement Eastwards. Cooperation and Conflict 39 (4): 347–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hyde-Price, A. 2006. “Normative” Power Europe: A Realist Critique. Journal of European Public Policy 13 (2): 217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jacoby, W. 2004. The Enlargement of the European Union and NATO: Ordering from the Menu in Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Korosteleva, E. 2009. The Limits of the EU Governance: Belarus’ Response to the European Neighbourhood Policy. Contemporary Politics 15 (2): 229–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. ———. 2011a. The Eastern Partnership Initiative: A New Opportunity for the Neighbours? Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 27 (1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. ———. 2011b. Change or Continuity: Is the Eastern Partnership an Adequate Tool for the European Neighbourhood. International Relations 25 (2): 243–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. ———. 2013. Evaluating the Role of Partnership in the European Neighbourhood Policy. Eastern Journal of European Studies 4 (2): 11–36.Google Scholar
  40. Kostanyan, H., ed. 2017. Assessing European Neigbourhood Policy: Perspectives from the Literature. Brussels/London: CEPS and Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  41. Kurki, M. 2012. Democratic Futures: Re-visioning Democracy Promotion. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Langbein, J., and T. Börzel. 2013. Introduction: Explaining Policy Change in the European Union’s Eastern Neighbourhood. Europe-Asia Studies 65 (4): 571–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lavenex, S. 2004. EU External Governance in “Wider Europe”. Journal of European Public Policy 11 (4): 680–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. ———. 2008. A Governance Perspective on the European Neighbourhood Policy: Integration Beyond Conditionality? Journal of European Public Policy 15 (6): 938–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lo, B. 2015. Russia and the New World Disorder. London/Washington, DC: Chatham House and Brookings.Google Scholar
  46. Lobjakas, A. 2008. EU: Poland, Sweden Breathe New Life Into Eastern Neighborhood. RFE/RL, May 26. Accessed 9 June 2017.
  47. MacFarlane, N., and A. Menon. 2014. The EU and Ukraine. Survival 56 (3): 95–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mahony, H. 2007. Barroso Says EU Is an ‘Empire’. EUobserver, July 11. Accessed 8 June 2017.
  49. Manners, I. 2002. Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms? Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (2): 235–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Marks, G. 2012. Europe and Its Empires: From Rome to the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (9): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mearsheimer, J. 2014. Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault. Foreign Affairs 93 (5): 1–12.Google Scholar
  52. Moravcsik, A., and M.A. Vachudova. 2003. National Interests, State Power, and EU Enlargement. East European Politics and Societies 17 (1): 42–57.Google Scholar
  53. O’Brennan, J. 2007. ‘Bringing Geopolitics Back In’: Exploring the Security Dimension of the 2004 Eastern Enlargement of the European Union. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 19 (1): 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pänke, J. 2013. The Empire Strikes Back: 1989, 2011 and Europe’s Neighbourhood Policy. In Global Power Europe (Vol. 2): Policies, Actions and Influence of the EU’s External Relations, ed. A.B. Boening, J.-F. Kremer, and A. van Loon. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  55. ———. 2015. The Fallout of the EU’s Normative Imperialism in the Eastern Neighborhood. Problems of Post-Communism 32 (6): 350–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Patomäki, H. 2018. Disintegrative Tendencies in Global Political Economy: Exits and Conflicts. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Pourchot, G. 2016. EU’s Eastern Empire. In Revisiting the European Union as Empire, ed. H. Behr and Y.A. Stivachtis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. RFE/RL. 2015. “Brussels Was … Asleep”: Bildt Assesses EU’s Mistakes Regarding Russia, Interview with Carl Bildt, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, March 22.Google Scholar
  59. Sakwa, R. 2015. The Death of Europe? Continental Fates After Ukraine. International Affairs 91 (3): 553–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sasse, G. 2008. The European Neighbourhood Policy: Conditionality Revisited for the EU’s Eastern Neighbours. Europe-Asia Studies 60 (2): 295–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sauer, T. 2017. The Origins of the Ukraine Crisis and the Need for Collective Security Between Russia and the West. Global Policy 8 (1): 82–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schimmelfennig, F. 2003. The EU, NATO and the Integration of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schimmelfennig, F., and U. Sedelmeier. 2005. Conclusions: The Impact of the EU on the Accession Countries. In The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe, ed. Frank Schimmelfennig and Ulrich Sedelmeier. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Scott, J.W. 2017. Constructing European Neighbourhood: Critical Perspectives from Ukraine Interaction and Civil Society Actors. Journal of Borderland Studies 32 (1): 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Smith, K.E. 2008. European Union Foreign Policy in a Changing World. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  66. Smith, N.R. 2016. EU-Russian Relations and the Ukraine Crisis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Spiegel Staff. 2014. Summit of Failure: How the EU Lost Russia Over Ukraine. Spiegel Online 24 November. Accessed 15 Apr 2017.
  68. Theuns, T. 2017. Promoting Democracy Through Economic Conditionality in the ENP: A Normative Critique. Journal of European Integration 39 (3): 287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tolstrup, J. 2013. Russia vs. the EU: The Competition for Influence in Post-Soviet States. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  70. Waever, O. 1997. Emerging European Analogies to Pre-nation State Imperial Systems. In Geopolitics in Post-Wall Europe: Security, Territory, and Identity, ed. O. Tunander, P. Baev, and V. Einagel. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  71. Wichmann, N. 2007. Promoting the Rule of Law in the European Neighbourhood Policy – Strategic or Normative Power? Politique européenne 22 (2): 81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Yaroshenko, T.Y., D.V. Krysko, V. Dobriyana, M.V. Zhigalova, H. Vos, P. Vandenabeele, and V.A. Krysko. 2015. Wavelet Modeling and Prediction of the Stability of States: The Roman Empire and the European Union. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 26 (1–3): 265–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zielonka, J. 2006. Europe as Empire. The Nature of the Enlarged European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tuomas Forsberg
    • 1
  • Hiski Haukkala
    • 1
  1. 1.University of TampereTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations