Educational Theories and Learning Analytics: From Data to Knowledge
The study of learning is grounded in theories and research. Since learning is complex and not directly observable, it is often inferred by collecting and analysing data based on the things learners do or say. By virtue, theories are developed from the analyses of data collected. With the proliferation of technology, large amounts of data are generated when students learn online. Therefore, researchers not only have data on students’ learning performance, but they also have data on the actions students take to achieve the desired learning outcomes. These data could help researchers to understand how students learn and the conditions needed for successful learning. In turn, the information can be translated to instructional and learning design to support students. The aim of the chapter is to discuss how learning theories and learning analytics are important components of educational research. To achieve this aim, studies employing learning analytics are qualitatively reviewed to examine which theories have been used and how the theories have been investigated. The results of the review show that self-regulated learning, motivation, and social constructivism theories were used in studies employing learning analytics. However, the studies at present are mostly correlational. Therefore, experimental studies are needed to examine how theory-informed practices can be implemented so that students can be better supported in online learning environments. The chapter concludes by proposing an iterative loop for educational research employing learning analytics in which learning theories guide data collection and analyses. To convert data into knowledge, it is important to recognize what we already know and what we want to examine.
KeywordsLearning theories Big data Learning analytics Study success
This research is supported by Leiden-Delft-Erasmus Centre for Education and Learning.
- Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25(4), 297–308.Google Scholar
- Atif, A., Bilgin, A., & Richards, D. (2015). Student preferences and attitudes to the use of early alerts. In Paper Presented at the Twenty-first Americas Conference on Information Systems.Google Scholar
- Bos, N., & Brand-Gruwel, S. (2016). Student differences in regulation strategies and their use of learning resources: Implications for educational design. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (pp. 344–353).Google Scholar
- Carter, A. S., & Hundhausen, C. D. (2016) With a little help from my friends: An empirical study of the interplay of students’ social activities, programming activities, and course success. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 201–209).Google Scholar
- Carter, A. S., Hundhausen, C. D., & Adesope, O. (2015). The normalized programming state model: Predicting student performance in computing courses based on programming behavior. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 141–150).Google Scholar
- Dawson, S., Gašević, D., Siemens, G., & Joksimovic, S. (2014). Current state and future trends: A citation network analysis of the learning analytics field. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 231–240).Google Scholar
- Greller, W., & Drachsler, H. (2012). Translating learning into numbers: A generic framework for learning analytics. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 42–57.Google Scholar
- Liu, S., & d’Aquin, M. (2017). Unsupervised learning for understanding student achievement in a distance learning setting. In Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2017 IEEE (pp. 1373–1377).Google Scholar
- Mayer, R. E. (2011). Applying the science of learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Na, K. S., & Tasir, Z. (2017). A systematic review of learning analytics intervention contributing to student success in online learning. In International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTICE) 2017 (pp. 62–68).Google Scholar
- Ormrod, J. E. (1999). Human learning (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective (6th. ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- SCImago. (2007). SJR—SCImago Journal & Country Rank. Retrieved July 21, 2015, from http://www.scimagojr.com.
- Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. Educause Review, 48(5), 31–40.Google Scholar
- Skinner, B. F. (1977). Why I am not a cognitive psychologist. Behavior, 5(2), 1–10.Google Scholar
- Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 55, pp. 37–76). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Tan, J. P. L., Yang, S., Koh, E., & Jonathan, C. (2016). Fostering twenty-first century literacies through a collaborative critical reading and learning analytics environment: user-perceived benefits and problematics. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (pp. 430–434).Google Scholar
- Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Yassine, S., Kadry, S., & Sicilia, M. A. (2016). A framework for learning analytics in moodle for assessing course outcomes. In Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2016 IEEE (pp. 261–266).Google Scholar
- Zhao, Y., Davis, D., Chen, G., Lofi, C., Hauff, C., & Houben, G. J. (2017). Certificate achievement unlocked: how does MOOC learners’ behaviour change? In Adjunct Publication of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (pp. 83–88).Google Scholar