Advertisement

Neoliberal Marketization of Global Contemporary Visual Art Worlds: Changes in Valuations and the Scope of Local and Global Markets

  • Kangsan Lee
Chapter
Part of the Sociology of the Arts book series (SOA)

Abstract

Neoliberal marketization has helped in the rise of a new art market as the influx of new money from both geographically new markets (i.e., Asian art markets) and a new group of art buyers (i.e., art investors) challenged key practices of the traditional art world in terms of valuation and consumption. This chapter illustrates how recent market change(s) in the contemporary art market expedite the reordering of status in contemporary art. Moreover, marketization, through commensuration and financialization, has made the cultural order in global art world less significant especially in newly emerging art markets. Focusing on the mechanisms and practice changes, the author shows how marketization has changed the conventional valuations and consumption practices in art markets, and created a growing interest in Asian contemporary art markets.

References

  1. Adam, Georgina. 2014. Big Bucks: The Explosion of the Art Market in the 21st Century. Surrey: Lund Humphries.Google Scholar
  2. Appadurai, Arjun. 1988. Introduction: Commodities and the Politics of Value. In The Social Life of Things, ed. Arjun Appadurai. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 1996. Modernity at Large. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 2005. Definitions: Commodity and Commodification. In Rethinking Commodification: Cases and Readings in Law and Culture, ed. Martha Ertman and Joan C. Williams, 35. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barker, Godfrey. 2008. Investing in Art; State of the Arts There’s the Love of Art and the Love of Money. The Art Market Rewards Them Both. The Times, December 16, 2008.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, Howard. 1982. Art Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Beckert, Jens. 2011. Where Do Prices Come from? Sociological Approaches to Price Formation. Socio-Economic Review 9: 757–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beckert, Jens, and Patrik Aspers. 2011. The Worth of Goods: Valuation and Pricing in the Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1983. The Field of Cultural Production. Poetics 12: 311–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ———. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 1986. The Forms of Capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for Sociology of Education, ed. J.G. Richardson. New York/Westport/London: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  12. Buchholz, Larissa. 2016. What Is a Global Field? Theorizing Fields Beyond the Nation-State. The Sociological Review Monographs. 64 (2): 31–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buchholz, Larissa, and Ulf Wuggenig. 2006. Cultural Globalization Between Myth and Reality. The Case of the Contemporary Visual Arts. Artefact, 4.Google Scholar
  14. Chanel, Olivier, Louis-André Gerard-Varet, and Victor Ginsburgh. 1996. The Relevance of Hedonic Price Indices: The Case of Paintings. Journal of Cultural Economics. 20: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crane, Diane, Nobuko Kawashima, and Kenichi Kawasaki. 2002. Global Culture: Media, Art, Policy, and Globalization. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Danto, Arthur Coleman. 2014[1997]. After the End of Art: Contemporary Art and the Pale of History. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Davis, Gerald F., and Suntae Kim. 2015. Financialization of the Economy. Annual Review of Sociology 41: 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ertug, Gokhan, Tamar Yogev, Yonghoon Lee, and Peter Hedstrom. 2015. The Art of Representation: How Audience-Specific Reputations Affect Success in the Contemporary Art Field. Academy of Management Journal 59 (1): 113–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Espeland, Wendy Nelson, and Michael Sauder. 2007. Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds. American Journal of Sociology. 113: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fourcade, Marion. 2011. Price and Prejudice: On Economics, and the Enchantment (or Disenchantment) of Nature. In The Worth of Goods, ed. Jens Beckert and Patrick Aspers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Franck, Georg. 1999. The Economy of Attention. Telepolis. Google Scholar
  22. Griswold, Wendy. 2008. Regionalism and the Reading Class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Haskell, Francis. 1980. Rediscoveries in Art: Some Aspects of Taste, Fashion and Collecting in England and France. London: Phaidon.Google Scholar
  24. Held, David, Anthony McGrew, David Goldblatt, and Jonathan Perraton. 1999. Globalization, Culture and the Fate of Nations. In Global Transformations, ed. David Held, Anthony McGrew, David Goldblatt, and Jonathan Perraton, 327–375. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hofstede, Geert. 1980. Culture Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Horowitz, Noah. 2010. Art of the Deal: Contemporary Art in a Global Financial Market. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Janssen, Susanne, Giselinde Kuipers, and Marc Verboord. 2008. Cultural Globalization and Arts Journalism: The International Orientation of Arts and Culture Coverage in Dutch, French, German, and U.S. Newspapers, 1955 to 2005. American Sociological Review. 73 (5): 719–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Karpik, Lucien. 2010. Valuing the Unique: The Economics of Singularity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Law, John, and Kevin Hetherington. 2000. Materialities, Globalities, Spatialities. In Knowledge, Space, Economy, ed. John Bryson, Peter Daniels, Nick Henry, and Jane Pollard, 34–49. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Mei, Jianping, and Michael Moses. 2002. Art as an Investment and the Underperformance of Masterpieces. The American Economic Review 92: 1656–1668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. ———. 2005. Vested Interest and Biased Price Estimates: Evidence from an Auction Market. The Journal of Finance. 60: 2409–2435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Quemin, Alain. 2006. Globalization and Mixing in the Visual Arts: An Empirical Survey of ‘High Culture’ and Globalization. International Sociology 21 (4): 522–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Renneboog, Luc, and Christophe Spaenjers. 2013. Buying Beauty: On Prices and Returns in the Art Market. Management Science 59 (1): 36–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shin, Dongyeub, Kangsan Lee, and Harbae Lee. 2014. Neoliberal Marketization of Art Worlds and Status Multiplexity: Price Formation in a Korean Art Auction, 1998–2007. Poetics 43: 120–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stigler, George, and Gary Becker. 1977. De gustibus non est disputandum. American Economic Review 67: 76–90.Google Scholar
  36. TEFAF. 2014. Art Market Report. Art Economics.Google Scholar
  37. ———. 2015. Art Market Report. Art Economics.Google Scholar
  38. Thompson, Don. 2008. The $12 Million Stuffed Shark: The Curious Economics of Contemporary Art. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  39. ———. 2014. The Supermodel and the Brillo Box: Back Stories and Peculiar Economics from the World of Contemporary Art. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  40. Tomlinson, John. 1999. Globalization and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  41. Velthuis, Olav. 2005. Talking Prices: Symbolic Meanings of Prices on the Market for Contemporary Art. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  42. ———. 2011. Damien’s Dangerous Idea: Valuing Contemporary Art at Auction. In The Worth of Goods: Valuation and Pricing in the Economy, ed. J. Beckert and P. Aspers, 178–200. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Velthuis, Olav, and S. Baia Curioni. 2015. Globalization of Markets for Contemporary Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Velthuis, Olav, and Baia Curioni. 2016. Cosmopolitan Canvases. Globalization of the Market for Contemporary Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Yogev, Tamar, and Gokhan Ertug. 2016. Global and Local Flows in the Contemporary Art Market: The Growing Prevalence of Asia. In Cosmopolitan Canvases. The Globalization of Markets for Contemporary Art, ed. Olav Velthuis and Baia Curioni, 193–212. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Internet-Based Sources

  1. Art Economics. Art Market Report. http://artseconomics.com/#about. Accessed 17 Feb 2017.
  2. Artprice.com. 2016. The Art Market in 2015. AMMA. http://imgpublic.artprice.com/pdf/rama2016_en.pdf. Accessed 7 Oct 2016.
  3. ArtRank. About. https://artrank.com/pages/faq. Accessed 7 Oct 2016.
  4. ArtTactic. About. https://arttactic.com/about-us. Accessed 7 Oct 2016.
  5. Bischoff, Dan. 2005. Deal Life: Art, for Art’s Sake. http://www.TheDeal.com. Accessed 2 June 2016.
  6. Cascone, Sarah. 2015. Chinese Billionaire Liu Yiqian Is the Buyer for the Record-Breaking $170-Million Modigliani Nude. https://news.artnet.com/market/liu-yiqian-modigliani-170-million-360029. Accessed 24 Aug 2016.
  7. Daniel, Daria. 2015. 40 Percent of World Gallery Art Sales Made at Fairs and Other Key Findings in the TEFAF Art Market Report 2015. March 12. https://news.artnet.com/market/5-key-findings-from-tefaf-report-2015-276301?utm_campaign=artnetnews&utm_source=031215daily&utm_medium=email. Accessed 17 Feb 2017.
  8. Knight, Sam. 2016. How an Art-World Insider Made a Fortune by Being Discreet. http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/02/08/the-bouvier-affair. Accessed 7 Jan 2017.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kangsan Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Social ScienceNew York UniversityAbu DhabiUAE

Personalised recommendations