Advertisement

Ontology-Based Cooperation in Cyber-Physical Social Systems

  • Alexander Smirnov
  • Tatiana Levashova
  • Alexey Kashevnik
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10444)

Abstract

The paper describes the research on cooperation of cyber-human resources in a cyber-physical social system. An ontology for a cyber-physical social system is proposed and specialized for the robotics assembly domain. A task from this domain is used to demonstrate scenarios of robot-robot cooperation and robot-human cooperation. Communications that support the cooperation processes are performed through online communities by messaging. Examples of messages and their format are given when the scenarios have been described.

Keywords

Cyber-physical social systems Ontology Robot cooperation Robot-human cooperation Online community 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research was partly supported by the projects funded through grants 16-29-04349, 17-07-00247, and 17-07-00248 of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, the research Programs I.31 and I.5 of the Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences, and Grant 074-U01 of the Government of Russian Federation.

References

  1. 1.
    Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H.: Collaborative networks: value creation in a knowledge society. In: Wang, K., Kovacs, G.L., Wozny, M., Fang, M. (eds.) PROLAMAT 2006. IIFIP, vol. 207, pp. 26–40. Springer, Boston, MA (2006). doi: 10.1007/0-387-34403-9_4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hoffman, G., Breazeal, C.: Collaboration in human-robot teams. In: AIAA 1st Intelligent Systems Technical Conference. AIAA (2004). http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2004-6434
  3. 3.
    Herasiuta, S., Sychou, U., Prakapovich, R.: Distributed information system for collaborative robots and IoT devices. In: Ronzhin, A., Rigoll, G., Meshcheryakov, R. (eds.) ICR 2016. LNCS, vol. 9812, pp. 63–68. Springer, Cham (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-43955-6_9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H.: A comprehensive modeling framework for collaborative networkedorganizations. J. Intell. Manuf. 18, 529–542 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barata, J., Camarinha-Matos, L.M.: Coalitions of manufacturing components for shop floor agility – the CoBASA architecture. Int. J. Netw. Virtual Organ. 2(1), 50–77 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Simões, D., Ferreira, H., Soares, A.L.: Ontology engineering in virtual breeding environments. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H., Novais, P., Analide, C. (eds.) PRO-VE 2007. ITIFIP, vol. 243, pp. 137–146. Springer, Boston, MA (2007). doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-73798-0_14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Knoll, S.W., Plumbaum, T., Hoffmann, J.L., De Luca, E.W.: Collaboration ontology: applying collaboration knowledge to a generic group support system. In: Proceedings of the 11th Group Decision and Negotiation Conference, pp. 12–26 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ermilova, E., Afsarmanesh, H.: Systematic analysis of information management challenges within long-term collaborative networks. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Xu, L., Afsarmanesh, H. (eds.) PRO-VE 2012. IAICT, vol. 380, pp. 446–456. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-32775-9_45 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Budkov, V.Y., Prischepa, M.V., Ronzhin, A.L., Karpov, A.A.: Multimodal human-robot interaction. In: 2010 International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems and Workshops (ICUMT), pp. 485–488. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rigoll, G.: Multimodal human-robot interaction from the perspective of a speech scientist. In: Ronzhin, A., Potapova, R., Fakotakis, N. (eds.) SPECOM 2015. LNCS, vol. 9319, pp. 3–10. Springer, Cham (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-23132-7_1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lemaignan, S., Ros, R., Sisbot, E.A., Alami, R., Beetz, M.: Grounding the interaction: anchoring situated discoursein everyday human-robot interaction. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 4, 181–199 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nirenburg, S., Raskin, V.: Ontological Semantics. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Raskin, V., Taylor, J.M., Hempelmann, C.F.: Ontological semantic technology for detecting insider threat and social engineering. In: 2010 New Security Paradigms Workshop, pp. 115–128. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Petrenko, M., Hempelmann, C.F.: Robotic reasoning with ontological semantic technology. In: Kim, J.-H., et al. (eds.) Robot Intelligence Technology and Applications. AISC, vol. 208, pp. 883–892. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-37374-9_85 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hong, J.H., Matson, E.T., Taylor, J.M.: Design of knowledge-based communication between human and robot using ontological semantic technology in firefighting domain. In: Kim, J.-H., Matson, E.T., Myung, H., Xu, P., Karray, F. (eds.) Robot Intelligence Technology and Applications 2. AISC, vol. 274, pp. 311–325. Springer, Cham (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-05582-4_27 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Raskin, V.: Theory, methodology, and implementation of robotic intelligenceand communication. Procedia Comput. Sci. 56, 508–513 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Borgo, S., Leitão, P.: The role of foundational ontologies in manufacturing domain applications. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2004. LNCS, vol. 3290, pp. 670–688. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-30468-5_43 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G.A.: Unified foundational ontology and some applications of it in business modeling. In: Proceedings of the Open Interop Workshop on Enterprise Modelling and Ontologies for Interoperability Co-located with CAiSE 2004 Conference. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2004). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-125/paper2.pdf
  19. 19.
    Oliveira, F.F., Antunes, J.C.P., Guizzardi, R.S..S.: Towards a collaboration ontology. In: Proceedings of Second Brazilian Workshop on Ontologies and Metamodels for Software and Data Engineering (WOMSDE 2007), pp. 97–108 (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schlenoff, C., et al.: An IEEE standard ontology for robotics and automation. In: 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1337–1342. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Antonelli, D., Bruno, G.: Human-robot collaboration using industrial robots. In: 2nd International Conference on Electrical, Automation and Mechanical Engineering (EAME 2017). Advances in Engineering Research, vol. 86, pp. 99–102. Atlantis Press (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Daoutis, M., Coradeshi, S., Loutfi, A.: Grounding commonsense knowledge in intelligent systems. J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ. 1, 311–321 (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nardi, J.C., de Almeida Falbo, R., Guizzardi, G., Pires, L.P., van Sinderen, M.J., Guarino, N., Fonseca, C.M.: A commitment-based reference ontology for services. Inform. Syst. 54, 263–288 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wollman, D.A.: Cyber-physical systems framework. NEMA Electroindustry J. 20(4), 12–13 (2015)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Smirnov, A., Levashova, T., Shilov, N., Sandkuhl, K.: Ontology for cyber-physical-social systems self-organisation. In: Proceedings of the 16th Conference of Open Innovations Association FRUCT, pp. 101–107 (2014)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Liu, Z., Yang, D.-S., Wen, D., Zhang, W.-M., Mao, W.: Cyber-physical-social systems for command and control. IEEE Intell. Syst. 26(4), 92–96 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dey, A.K.: Understanding and using context. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 5(1), 4–7 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zimmermann, A., Lorenz, A., Oppermann, R.: An operational definition of context. In: Kokinov, B., Richardson, D.C., Roth-Berghofer, T.R., Vieu, L. (eds.) CONTEXT 2007. LNCS, vol. 4635, pp. 558–571. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-74255-5_42 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Baumgartner, N., Gottesheim, W., Mitsch, S., Retschitzegger, W.: BeAware!-situation awareness, the ontology-driven way. Data Knowl. Eng. 69(11), 1181–1193 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sanfilippo, E.M., Borgo, S., Masolo, C.: Events and activities: is there an ontology behind BPMN? In: Garbacz, P., Kutz, O. (eds.) Formal Ontology in Information Systems, pp. 147–156. IOS Press (2014)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Scherp, A., Saathoff, C., Franz, T., Staab, S.: Designing core ontologies. Appl. Ontol. 6(3), 177–221 (2011)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Smirnov, A., Kashevnik, A., Mikhailov, S., Mironov, M., Petrov, M. Ontology-based collaboration in multi-robot system: approach and case study. In: 11th System of Systems Engineering Conference (SoSE), pp. 329–334. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Smart-M3 at Sourceforge (2009). https://sourceforge.net/projects/smart-m3/. Accessed 30 May 2017
  34. 34.
    d’Aquin, M., Gangemi, A.: Is there beauty in ontologies? Appl. Ontol. 6(3), 165–175 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander Smirnov
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tatiana Levashova
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alexey Kashevnik
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.St. Petersburg Institute for Informatics and Automation of the Russian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.ITMO UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations