Queering the Campus Gender Landscape Through Visual Arts Praxis

  • Libby Balter Blume
  • Rosemary Weatherston
Part of the Queer Studies and Education book series (QSTED)


Libby Balter Blume and Rosemary Weatherston critically analyze the pedagogy and praxis of queering the gender landscape on an urban, Catholic university campus through 12 years of international juried fine arts exhibitions co‐curated by women’s and gender studies faculty. Past exhibition themes have included (re)visioning gender, embodiment, gender politics, gendered space/s, masculinities and feminism, and (trans)ition. These campus interventions have used visual arts, poetry, performance, environmental installation, interdisciplinary lectures, and course work to interrogate gender as a socially constructed, relational category and to deconstruct male/female binaries and dominant/minority discourses in academic space. Blume and Weatherston’s interdisciplinary essay utilizes both social science and humanities frameworks of “queering” and queer pedagogy to examine intersections of artistic practices of “seeing differently” and activist re/productions of visual arts discourses. Finally, they address the limitations and potential of using the curatorial space of the exhibitions to engender change as well as reflection.

Works Cited

  1. Barth, Kelly. 2012. My Almost Certainly Real Imaginary Jesus. Pasadena: Arktoi Books. Print.Google Scholar
  2. Bryson, Mary, and Suzanne de Castell. 1993. Queer Pedagogy: Praxis Makes Im/Perfect. Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l’éducation 18 (3): 285–305. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. New York: Routledge. Print.Google Scholar
  4. Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith/Congregatio Pro Doctrina Fidei. Doctrinal Assessment of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious. Doctrinal Assessment For LCWR. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. Web. 12 Mar 2013.Google Scholar
  5. Davies, Cristyn. 2012. Imagining Otherwise: Performance Art as Queer Time and Space. In Queer and Subjugated Knowledges: Generating Subversive Imaginaries, ed. Cristyn Davies, Kerry H. Robinson, and Bronwyn Davies, 23–55. Oak Park: Bentham Science. Print.Google Scholar
  6. Dumbadze, Alexander, and Suzanne Hudson. 2013. Participation. In Dumbadze and Hudson, 202–203. Print.Google Scholar
  7. Gillick, Liam, and Maria Lind. 2013. Participation. In Dumbadze and Hudson, 204–213. Print.Google Scholar
  8. Gioni, Massimiliano. 2013. Defense of Biennials. In Dumbadze and Hudson, 171–177. Print.Google Scholar
  9. Hathaway, Heather, Gregory J. O’Meara S.J, and Stephanie Quade. 2012. Textual Deviance: Eve Ensler’s The Vagina Monologues and Catholic Campuses. In Jesuit & Feminist Education: Intersections in Teaching and Learning for the Twenty-first Century, ed. Jocelyn Boryczka and Elizabeth Petrino, 203–233. New York: Fordham University Press. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jones, Amelia. 2012. Seeing Differently: A History and Theory of Identification and the Visual Arts. London: Routledge. Print.Google Scholar
  11. Jones, Caroline A. 2013. Biennial Culture and the Aesthetics of Experience. In Dumbadze and Hudson, 192–201. Print.Google Scholar
  12. Monro, Surya. 2012. Beyond Male and Female: Poststructuralism and the Spectrum of Gender. International Journal of Transgenderism 8 (1): 3–22. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. 1993. Queer and Now. In Tendencies, 1–20. Durham: Duke University Press. Print.Google Scholar
  14. Sharp, Elizabeth A., and Genevieve Durham DeCesaro. 2015. Modeling Innovative Methodological Practices in a Dance/Family Studies Transdisciplinary Project. Journal of Family Theory & Review 7 (4): 367–380. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sherrill, K. Steven. 2010. Ersatz Anatomy: Poems. Cincinnati: Word Tech Communications. Print.Google Scholar
  16. Wu, Chin-Tao. 2009. Biennials Without Borders? New Left Review 57: 107–115, May–June. Print.Google Scholar
  17. Zolghadr, Tirdad. 2013. Fusions of Powers: Four Models of Agency in the Field of Contemporary Art, Ranked Unapologetically in Order of Preference. In Dumbadze and Hudson, 277–286. Print.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Libby Balter Blume
    • 1
  • Rosemary Weatherston
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Detroit MercyDetroitUSA

Personalised recommendations