Application of Information Technology in Improvement of Teachers’ Competence

  • R. K. Toleubekova
  • Galiya B. Sarzhanova
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)

Abstract

This study investigates the process of implementation of information technology (IT) in education, and the impact of computerization on the quality of teaching. In addition, the need to define the requirements of IT competencies of a present-day teacher in order to establish whether they are at the appropriate level is reiterated. Following the results of this study, it is concluded that the IT competency of a present-day teacher is one of the key indicators of the success rate of that teacher’s activity and is also a necessary precondition for furthering the level of their professional competency. This therefore emphasizes the significance of working on a professional development system for a modern teacher, concentrating on the use of the IT system. This model of professional development allows for solving some tasks and increases the level of IT competency of a present-day teacher; however, it also has a number of disadvantages and does not fully cater to comprehensive problems on the part of teachers who rely so much on the active use of IT in their professional activity.

Keywords

Information technology Qualification Competency Higher education Quality improvement 

References

  1. Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Buckingham Shum, S. (2012). Learning analytics: Policy brief November 2012. Moscow: UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education. URL: http://iite.unesco.org/pics/publications/en/files/3214711.pdf.Google Scholar
  3. Conole, G. (2012). ICT and general administration in educational institutions, Policy Brief May 2012. Moscow, UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education.: URL: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0022/002202/220241E.pdf.
  4. Erçetin, Ş. Ş. (2001). Biz akademisyenler geleceğin yükseköğretim kurumlarını yaratmaya hazır mıyız? Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 7(25), 75–86.Google Scholar
  5. Erçetin, Ş.Ş., & Kayman, E.A. (2014). How to be a quantum leader in an intelligent organization? In S. Banerjee, & Ş.Ş. Erçetin (Eds.), Chaos, complexity and leadership 2012 (pp. 247–252). Springer Proceedings in Complexity 2014. DOI:10.1007/978-94-007-7362-2_31.Google Scholar
  6. Erçetin, Ş. Ş., Açıkalın, Ş. N., & Bülbül, M. Ş. (2013). Chapter 5: A multi-dimensional approach to leadership in chaotic environments. In S. Banerjee (Ed.), Chaos and complexity theory for management: Nonlinear dynamics (pp. 89–104). Hershey: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Erçetin, Ş. Ş., Potas, N., & Koç, İ. (2016). Chapter 11: Organizational intelligence scale for business organizations in chaotic situations. In Ş. Ş. Erçetin & H. Bağcı (Eds.), Handbook of research on chaos and complexity theory in the social sciences (pp. 133–152). Hershey: IGI Global Publication.  https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0148-0.ch011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Johnson, L., Levine, A., & Smith, R. (2009). The 2009 horizon report. Austin: The New Media Consortium, 2009. URL: http://www.nmc.org/pdf/2009-Horizon-Report.pdf.Google Scholar
  9. MacNeill, S., & Kraan, W. (2010). Distributed learning environment. Briefing Paper February 2010. JISC CETIS, 2010. URL: http://wiki.cetis.ac.uk/images/6/6c/Distributed_Learning.pdf
  10. Pasnik, S. (2007). iPod in education: The potential for teaching and learning—a white paper for iPods in education. Prepared for Apple computers. New York: Education Development Center.Google Scholar
  11. Sarzhanova, G. B. (2014). Development conditions in using of information technologies. Actual problems in training of modern teachers. Materials of Science-Practice Conference. Astana 2014.Google Scholar
  12. State Program of Development Education in Kazakhstan for 2011–2020y.Google Scholar
  13. UNESCO (2006). UNESCO Guidelines on Intercultural Education. Document 33C/5, Draft Report of the Commission II, item 3.1. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  14. Voogt, J. (2012). ICTs for curriculum change: Policy brief, April, 2012. Moscow: UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education. URL: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0022/002202/220243e.pdf.Google Scholar
  15. World Open Educational Resources (OER). (2012). Congress: 2012 Paris OER declaration. Paris, 20–22 June 2012. Paris: UNESCO. URL: http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CI/CI/pdf/Events/English_Paris_OER_Declaration.pdf.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. K. Toleubekova
    • 1
  • Galiya B. Sarzhanova
    • 1
  1. 1.Eurasia National University named after Gumilev L.N.AstanaRepublic of Kazakhstan

Personalised recommendations