Reflection of Quantum Entanglement Principle to Organization Theory “Organizational Insight”

  • Şefika Şule Erçetin
  • Şuay Nilhan Açıkalın
  • Halime Güngör
  • Nihan Potas
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)

Abstract

This study’s aim is to initiate a discussion on the reflection of quantum entanglement on organization theory called “organizational insight.” In today’s world, physicists state that the best candidate to explain consciousness is quantum theory. Organizational insight is the ability to foresee the chaotic situation and the future provision of the organization in the organization environment with the experiences of taking inferences from the history of the organization, the presence of a strong organizational communication, and high level of consciousness. In this sense, there have been reflections of quantum theory to organization theory, because we can explain consciousness with quantum. In this study, reflections of quantum entanglement principle to organizational consciousness and organizational communication, organizational insight concept, and relationship between organizational insight and chaos were discussed. This discussion is expected to trigger off a high level of academic and research interest in the field of organization. In subsequent discussions of this undertaking, we shall seek to examine organizational insight phenomenon by analyzing different organizations, and secondly we will examine organizational insight in terms of the organizational intelligence phenomenon.

Keywords

Quantum Entanglement Organizational Consciousness Organizational Communication Organizational Insight Chaos 

References

  1. Açıkalın, Ş. N., & Bölücek, C. A. (2014). Chapter 3: Understanding of Arab Spring with chaos theory – Uprising or revolution. In S. Banerjee, Ş. Ş. Erçetin, & A. Tekin (Eds.), Chaos theory in politics (pp. 29–50). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Açıkalın, Ş. N., & Erçetin, Ş. Ş. (2014). Great illusion in twenty-first century-Chaos knocking door. In S. Banerjee & Ş. Ş. Erçetin (Eds.), Chaos, complexity and leadership 2012, Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Dordrecht: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7362-2_1.Google Scholar
  3. Duran, D. (2011). Kuantum dolanıklık ve kuantum bilişim kuramındaki uygulamaları. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Fizik Anabilim Dalı.Google Scholar
  4. Erçetin, Ş. Ş., Hamedoğlu, M. A., & Açıkalın, Ş. N. (2014a). Chapter 7: Can managerial narcissism which likely leads to a chaotic process be measured? Managerial Narcissism Scale (MNS). In Ş. Ş. Erçetin & S. Banerjee (Eds.), Chaos and complexity in world politics. IGI Global: Hershey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Erçetin, Ş. Ş., Tekin, A., & Açıkalın, Ş. N. (2014b). Chapter 1: Organized and disorganized chaos a new dynamics in peace intelligence. In S. Banerjee, Ş. Ş. Erçetin, & A. Tekin (Eds.), Chaos theory in politics (pp. 3–16). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Erol, M. (2009). Kuantum fiziği ve bilinç. http://kisi.deu.edu.tr/mustafa.erol/. adresinden 08.04.2016 tarihinde erişildi.
  7. Erol, M. (2010). Quantum entanglement: Fundamentals and relations with consciousness/mind. Neuro-Quantology, 8(3), 390–402.Google Scholar
  8. Kauffman, S. (2010). Is there a poised realm between quantum and classical worlds? http://stuartkauffman.com/index_25_1612352741.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Şefika Şule Erçetin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Şuay Nilhan Açıkalın
    • 2
    • 3
  • Halime Güngör
    • 1
  • Nihan Potas
    • 4
  1. 1.Hacettepe UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Lancaster UniversityLancasterUK
  3. 3.International Relations DepartmentMiddle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  4. 4.Health Care Management DepartmentGazi UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations