A Web-Based System for KPI-Based Workplace Learning

  • Minhong Wang
Part of the Explorations in the Learning Sciences, Instructional Systems and Performance Technologies book series (LSIS)


This chapter explores the implementation of a Web-based system for KPI-based learning in the workplace. The details of the system architecture, the implementation of the KPI model with the KPI-based learning ontology, the KPI-based learning process, and the developed system are elaborated. In view of the importance of the KPI-based learning ontology in the system, the quality of the ontology is evaluated in multiple aspects.


Web-based learning system Workplace e-learning Key performance indicator KPI Performance-oriented learning Learning ontology Ontology evaluation E-learning implementation 


  1. Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (1997). Managing in an age of modularity. Harvard Business Review, 75(5), 84–93.Google Scholar
  2. Bertolino, A. (2001). Software testing. In A. Abran, J. W. Moore, P. Bourque, R. Dupuis, & L. L. Tripp (Eds.), Swebok: Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge: Trial Version 1.00 (pp. 69–86). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
  3. Brank, J., Grobelnik, M., & Mladenic, D. (2005). A survey of ontology evaluation techniques. In Proceedings of the Conference on Data Mining and Data Warehouses.Google Scholar
  4. Gangemi, A., Catenacci, C., Ciaramita, M., & Lemann, J. (2006). Modelling ontology evaluation and validation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4011, 140–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jia, H., Wang, M., Ran, W., Yang, S. J. H., Liao, J., & Chiu, D. K. W. (2011). Design of a performance-oriented workplace e-learning system using ontology. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 3372–3382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Noy, N. F., Fergerson, R. W., & Musen, M. A. (2000). The knowledge model of Protege-2000: Combining interoperability and flexibility. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on knowledge engineering and knowledge management (pp. 1–20).Google Scholar
  7. Simon, H. A. (2003). The architecture of complexity. In R. Garud, A. Kumaraswamy, & R. N. Langlois (Eds.), Managing in the modular age: Architectures, networks, and organizations (pp. 15–44). Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  8. Sirin, E., Parsia, B., Grau, B. C., Kalyanpur, A., & Katz, Y. (2007). Pellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner. Journal of Web Semantics, 5(2), 51–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sure, Y. (Ed.). (2004). Why evaluate ontology technologies? Because it works! IEEE Intelligent Systems, 19(4), 74–81.Google Scholar
  10. Uschold, U., & Gruninger, M. (1996). Ontologies: Principles, methods, and applications. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 11(2), 93–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wang, M. (2011). Integrating organizational, social, and individual perspectives in web 2.0-based workplace e-learning. Information Systems Frontiers, 13(2), 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Minhong Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of EducationThe University of Hong KongHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations