Advertisement

“Our Stories, Our Way”: Interdisciplinary Applied Research Exploring the Safe and Meaningful Engagement of Young People in Post-Conflict Truth Telling in Northern Uganda

  • Cheryl Heykoop
Chapter

Abstract

The author develops a chapter based on her important work with young people affected by armed conflicts in East Africa in the context of young people’s engagement in post-conflict truth telling. This rather new focus of research is based on a children’s rights paradigm. Specifically the participatory action research (PAR) focuses on young people in northern Uganda, aged 11–23, who were formerly abducted (FA), internally displaced (ID), born in captivity (BIC), and/or disabled by the war (DBW). Specifically, the research considers the processes, methods, and outcomes to support young people’s engagement in truth telling. The author argues that young people’s meaningful and ethical engagement in post-conflict truth telling is a complex and long-term process that empowers young people to share their experiences and contributes to healing and reconciliation. This requires giving young people a variety of engagement opportunities that offer support and protection and contribute to tangible changes in their lives and communities.

The study draws on a complexity of conceptual approaches including the psychology of children and youth (including studies of PTSD), cultural studies, community and individual health studies, and human rights law. In the end, the author illustrates the need for a critical reflection on how young people are currently engaged in post-conflict truth telling, and offers suggestions on how to more meaningfully and ethically engage young people in post-conflict truth telling and other transitional justice processes in Uganda and around the globe.

References

  1. Annan, J., Blattman, C., & Horton, R. (2006). The state of youth and youth protection in northern Uganda: Findings from the survey of war affected youth. Kampala: UNICEF.Google Scholar
  2. Baines, E., Stover, E., & Wierda, M. (2006). War-affected children and youth in northern Uganda: Toward a brighter future. An assessment report. Chicago: John D. & Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.Google Scholar
  3. Blanchet-Cohen, N., & Cook, P. (Eds.). (2005). Growing up in cities Canada: Creative tools for civic engagement of young people. Victoria: International Institute for Child Rights and Development.Google Scholar
  4. Bywaters, P., & Letherby, G. (2006). Chapter 1: Extending social research. In G. Letherby & P. Bywaters (Eds.), Extending social research: Application, implementation and publication (pp. 3–16). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Centre for Children in Vulnerable Situations (CCVS), & War Child Holland. (2013). The Kampala recommendations on the recovery and reintegration of children and youth affected by armed conflict. Kampala: CCVS & War Child Holland.Google Scholar
  6. Cheney, K. E. (2005). ‘Our children have only known war’: Children’s experiences and the uses of childhood in northern Uganda. Children’s Geographies, 3(1), 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Christensen, P., & James, A. (Eds.). (2008). Research with children: Perspectives and practices (2nd ed.). Oxon & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Cook, P., & Heykoop, C. (2010). Chapter 5: Child participation in the Sierra Leonean truth and reconciliation commission. In S. Parmar, M. J. Roseman, S. Siegrist, & T. Sowa (Eds.), Children and transitional justice: Truth-telling, accountability and reconciliation (pp. 159–191). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press & UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.Google Scholar
  9. Cook, P., Heykoop, C., Anuntavoraskul, A., & Vibulphol, J. (2012). Action research exploring information communication technologies (ICT) and child protection in Thailand. Development in Practice, 22(4), 574–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Currie, V., & Heykoop, C. (2011). CPP circle of rights workbook series: Reflective planning for social change. Victoria, BC: International Institute for Child Rights and Development.Google Scholar
  11. Currie, V., & Heykoop, C. (2012). Child and youth-centred accountability: A guide for involving young people in monitoring & evaluating child protection systems. Victoria, BC: International Institute for Child Rights and Development.Google Scholar
  12. Euwema, M., de Graaff, D., de Jager, A., & Kalksma-van Lith, B. (2008). Chapter 9: Research with children in war-affected areas. In P. Christensen & A. James (Eds.), Research with children: Perspectives and practices (2nd ed., pp. 189–204). Oxon & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Greater Northern Uganda Transitional Justice Working Group (GNUTJWG). (2009, June). Confronting the truth in Uganda?: Conference report. Lira, Uganda: GNUTJWG/International Center for Transitional Justice/Austrian Development Cooperation.Google Scholar
  14. Heykoop, C. (2013a). 2013 final five SSHRC storyteller. [video online]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1-EUE6j8uY
  15. Heykoop, C. (2013b). Our stories matter: Young people in post-conflict truth telling in northern Uganda. [video online]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jvy0daFzBFA
  16. Heykoop, C., & Adoch, J. (2017). ‘Our stories, our own ways’: Exploring the safe and meaningful engagement of young people in post-conflict truth telling. Journal of Peace Psychology, 23(1),14–22. Google Scholar
  17. Heykoop, C., & Ladisch, V. (2016, February). Exploring transitional justice through the eyes of young people: Reflections from Uganda. CPC Learning Network & IICRD. [webinar online]. Retrieved from http://www.cpcnetwork.org/february-26-2016-exploring-transitional-justice/
  18. Hopwood, J. (2011). We can’t be sure who killed us: Memory and memorialization in post-conflict northern Uganda. New York: International Center for Transitional Justice.Google Scholar
  19. Hovil, L., & Okello, M. C. (2011). Editorial note. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 5(3), 333–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. James, A., & Prout, A. (1990). Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  21. Justice Law and Order Sector (JLOS). (2013). 3rd draft of the transitional justice policy. Presented at the Consensus Building Workshop May 21, 2013, Imperial Royale Hotel, Kampala, Uganda.Google Scholar
  22. McKay, S., Veale, A., Worthen, M., & Wessells, M. (2011). Building meaningful participation in reintegration among war-affected young mothers in Liberia, Sierra Leone and northern Uganda. Intervention, 9(2), 108–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morrow, V. (2001). Using qualitative methods to elicit young people’s perspectives on their environments: Some ideas for community health initiatives. Health Education Research, 16(3), 255–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. O’Kane, C. (2008). Chapter 6: The development of participatory techniques: Facilitating children’s views about decisions which affect them. In P. Christensen & A. James (Eds.), Research with children: Perspectives and practices (2nd ed., pp. 125–155). Oxon & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). (2007). Making peace our own: Victims’ perceptions of accountability, reconciliation and transitional justice in northern Uganda. United Nations.Google Scholar
  26. Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of action research: The concise paperback edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Royal Roads University. (2013). Learning and teaching model. Victoria: Royal Roads University.Google Scholar
  29. Stark, L., Ager, A., Wessells, M., & Boothby, N. (2009). Developing culturally relevant indicators of reintegration for girls formerly associated with armed groups in Sierra Leone using a participative ranking methodology. Intervention, 7(1), 4–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre (IRC), & International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ). (2010). Children and truth commissions. Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.Google Scholar
  31. Veale, A., & Stavrou, A. (2003). Violence, reconciliation, and identity: The reintegration of Lord’s Resistance Army child abductees in northern Uganda. Monograph 92, Institute for Security Studies (ISS), South Africa.Google Scholar
  32. Veale, A., & Stavrou, A. (2007). Former Lord’s resistance Army child soldier abductees: Explorations of identity in reintegration and reconciliation. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 13(3), 273–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wadsworth, Y. (1998). What is participatory action research? Action Research International, paper 2. Retrieved from http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/ari/p-ywadsworth98.html
  34. Worthen, M., Veale, A., McKay, S., & Wessells, M. (2010). ‘I stand like a woman’: Empowerment and human rights in the context of community-based reintegration of girl mothers formerly associated with fighting forces and armed groups. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 2(1), 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cheryl Heykoop
    • 1
  1. 1.Royal Roads Univesity, School of Leadership StudiesVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations