Advertisement

Emotivity and Ephemera Research

  • Kip Jones
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter reports on a two-day experimental workshop in an arts-led interviewing technique using ephemera to elicit life stories and then reporting narrative accounts back using creative means of presentation. Participants told each other stories from their pasts based on objects that they presented to each other as gifts. Each partner then reported the shared story to the group using arts-led presentation methods.

Narrative research and the qualitative duologue are discussed. Through interviewing, scholars are often astonished to find their own narratives in the stories that people tell them. Time and time again, when given the opportunity, academics long to connect emotionally with the people whom they encounter in their investigations. There is a new “emotivity” emergent from such connectivity worth exploring. A big part of “Neo Emotivism” (a phrase coined to mimic the grand theories of the past, but with an ironic and profound emphasis on the post-modern and the personal) is embracing this phenomenon, instead of backing away from it as we may have done in the past.

The conclusion is drawn that academics yearn to express the more emotive connections generated by listening to the stories of strangers. The procedures followed in the two‐day workshop are outlined in order that others may also organise their own experiments in eliciting narratives using personal objects and retelling stories creatively. The first step in reporting emotive encounters in research, therefore, is moving away from concepts that have evolved from positivist procedures and measurement; the second step is to find our own individual languages to report our experiences of “Neo Emotivism.”

References

  1. Bourriaud, N. (2002; English version). Relational Aesthetics. Dijon: Les Presses du Reel.Google Scholar
  2. Denzin, N. (2000). Narrative’s Moment. In M. Andrews (Ed.), Explorations in Sociology, Psychology, and Cultural Studies (pp. xi–xii). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Hewitt, A., & Jordan, M. (2004). Talking Up the Social. Press Corps 2004 Liverpool Biennial. Retrieved from http://www.everydayarchive.org/presscorps/writing/hewitt-jordan.pdf
  4. Jones, K. (2001). I Can Remember the Night (Video). The Sociological Cinema. Retrieved from http://www.thesociologicalcinema.com/videos/i-can-remember-the-night
  5. Jones, K. (2007). How Did I Get to Princess Margaret? (And How Did I Get Her to the World Wide Web?) Forum: Qualitative Social Research Special Issue on Virtual Ethnography, 8(3). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative research.net/index.php/fqs/rt/suppFiles/281/617/
  6. Jones, K. (2012). Connecting Research with Communities Through Performative Social Science. The Qualitative Report, 17(18), 1–8. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR17/jones.pdf
  7. Jones, K. (2014). (The Grand Theory of) Neo Emotivism. Social Science Space. Retrieved from http://www.socialsciencespace.com/2014/10/the-grand-theory-of-neo-emotivism/
  8. Kimball, M. (2013). Michael Kimball Writes Your Life Story (on a Postcard). Atlanta: Publishing Genius Press.Google Scholar
  9. Maysles, A., & Maysles, D. (1975). Grey Gardens (Documentary Film). (Producer). New York: Portrait Films, (Directors) Albert and David Maysles.Google Scholar
  10. Mills, C. W. (1959). The Sociological Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Mills, C. W. (2000). The Sociological Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kip Jones
    • 1
  1. 1.Bournemouth UniversityPooleUK

Personalised recommendations