Advertisement

Why Consumer Psychology Needs Neurophilosophy

  • Paul M. W. Hackett
  • Gordon R. Foxall
Chapter

Abstract

The possibility that the neural correlates of consumer behavior can be identified is intriguing for consumer theorists and market analysts alike. The possibility of explaining consumer choice in terms of neural events promises to link consumer psychology with biology and to relate some of the most ubiquitous aspects of human behavior to their evolutionary origins. As Bickle (Philosophy and Neuroscience: A Ruthlessly Reductive Account, Dordrecht, p. xiii, 2003) puts it: “We move closer every day to actually having something that human beings have speculated about for centuries, a purely physical account of behavioral causes.” The result according to some could be a genuine consilience of the social and biological sciences. The possibility that such aspects of consumer choice as brand and retail preferences might come under greater managerial control clearly motivates industrial concerns to seek out tools of “neuromarketing” on which to base market strategies that enhance corporate effectiveness and profitability. The hope that consumer cognition might turn out to be reducible to neurophysiological functioning raises both expectations and concern over the potential to influence thought and actions. It is time to take stock.

Hardcastle and Stewart (The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Neuroscience, Oxford, 2009) prompt us to ask such questions as: Does fMRI scanning genuinely provide a “cerebrascope” which permits the tacking of cognition? Do the firing patterns of neurons constitute actual thoughts, or the physical representations of thoughts just correlate of thoughts, or what? Two questions we ought to pose before we give way to speculation are “How far can neurophysiological events shed light on cognition?” and “What is the role of behavior, especially verbal behavior, in interpreting neural events?” This chapter argues that consumer psychology is in need of a neurophilosophy that relates neuroscience to the explanation of behavior via the construction of cognitive processing. Neurophilosophy in this sense relates to the implications of neurophysiological research for the explanation of behavior.

The chapter first discusses the potential role of neuroscience in consumer psychology and goes on to consider some of the difficulties involved in interdisciplinary research of the required kind. It goes on to enquire: “What is the most appropriate level of analysis for this work if a convincing case is to be made for a consumer neuroscience that genuinely contributes to the explanation of consumer choice?”

References

  1. Arlig, A. (2015). Medieval Mereology. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2015 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (Ed.). URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/mereology-medieval/.
  2. Bakardjieva, E., & Kimmel, A. J. (2016). Neuromarketing Research Practices: Attitudes, Ethics, and Behavioral Intentions. Ethics & Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2016.1162719
  3. Bennett, M. R., & Hacker, P. M. S. (2003). Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  4. Bickle, J. (2003). Philosophy and Neuroscience: A Ruthlessly Reductive Account. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bickle, J. (Ed.). (2009). The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Calosi, C., & Graziani, P. (2014). Mereology and the Sciences: Parts and Wholes in the Contemporary Scientific Context (Synthese Library). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Casati, R., & Varzi, A. C. (1999). Parts and Places: The Structures of Spatial Representation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Churchland, P[aul]. (2007). Neurophilosophy at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Churchland, P[atricia], S[mith]. (1986). Neurophilosophy: Toward a Unified Science of the Mind/Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Fisher, C. E., Chin, L., & Klitzman, R. (2010). Defining Neuromarketing: Practices and Professional Challenges. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 18(4), 230–237. https://doi.org/10.3109/10673229.2010.496623
  11. Foxall, G. R. (2008). Reward, Emotion and Consumer Choice: From Neuroeconomics to Neurophilosophy. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 7, 368–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foxall, G. R. (2014a). Neurophilosophy of Explanation in Economic Psychology: An Exposition in Terms of Neuro-Behavioral Decision Systems. In L. Moutinho, E. Bigné, & A. K. Manrai (Eds.), Routledge Companion to the Future of Marketing (pp. 134–150). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Foxall, G. R. (2014b). Cognitive Requirements of Competing Neuro-Behavioral Decision Systems: Some Implications of Temporal Horizon for Managerial Behavior in Organizations. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, Article 184, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00184.
  14. Foxall, G. R. (2016a). Addiction as Consumer Choice: Exploring the Cognitive Dimension. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Foxall, G. R. (2016b). Metacognitive Control of Categorial Neurobehavioral Decision Systems. Frontiers in Psychology (Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology), 7(170), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00170.Google Scholar
  16. Frazzetto, G., & Anker, S. (2009). Neuroculture. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 815–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gallucci, F. (2016). Neuromarketing. Milano: Egea.Google Scholar
  18. Gilmore, C. (2014). Location and Mereology. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (Ed.). URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/location-mereology/.
  19. Hackett, P. M. W. (2014). Facet Theory and the Mapping Sentence: Evolving Philosophy, Use and Application. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Hackett, P. M. W. (2016). Psychology and Philosophy of Abstract Art: Neuroaesthetics, Perception and Comprehension. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hackett, P. M. W. (2017). The Perceptual Structure of Three-Dimensional Art: A Mapping Sentence Mereology, Springer Briefs in Philosophy. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hammou, K. A., Galib, M. S., & Melloul, J. (2013). The Contributions of Neuromarketing in Marketing Research. Journal of Management Research, 5(4), 20–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hardcastle, V. G., & Stewart, C. M. (2009). fMRI: A Modern Cerebrascope? The Case of Pain. In J. Bickle (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Neuroscience (pp. 179–199). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Harte, V. (2002). Plato on Parts and Wholes: The Metaphysics of Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kleinschmidt, S. (2014). Mereology and Location. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marques dos Santos, J. P., & Moutinho, L. A. (2016). Decision-“Making” or How Decisions Emerge in a Cyclic Automatic Process Parsimoniously Regulated by Reason. In G. R. Foxall (Ed.), The Routledge Companion to Consumer Behavior Analysis. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Morin, C. (2011). Neuromarketing: The New Science of Consumer Behavior. Society, 48(2), 131–135: 61–62.Google Scholar
  28. Niemczyk, C. (2016). Neuromarketing. Kundenkommunikation Und Markenfuhrung Fur Die Unternehmenszukunft. Munich: Grin Verlag.Google Scholar
  29. Rolls, E. T. (2012). Neuroculture: The Implications of Brain Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Simons, P. (1987). Parts. A Study in Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Simmons, P. (2000). Parts: A Study in Ontology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Surma, S. J., Srzednicki, J. T. J., Barnett, J. D., & Rickey, V. F. (1992). Collected Works, 2 vols. Dordrecht/Warszawa: Kluwer/Polish Scientific Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Szymczak, A. (2016). Neuromarketing: Implications for Dove Digital Campaign. Saarbrücken: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing GmbH & Co. KG.Google Scholar
  34. Varzi, A. (2016). Mereology. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), forthcoming. URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/mereology/.
  35. Zaltman, G., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2000, August 8). Neuroimaging as a Marketing Tool. 6,099,319. U.S. Patent.Google Scholar
  36. Zeidler, N. (2016). Neuromarketing Im Internet. Munich: Grin Verlag.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul M. W. Hackett
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gordon R. Foxall
    • 3
  1. 1.University of GloucestershireCheltenhamUK
  2. 2.University of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  3. 3.Cardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations