Advertisement

Feminist Ecologies in Religious Interpretation: Australian Influences

  • Anne Elvey
Chapter

Abstract

Internationally significant Australian work in ecological philosophy can be traced to at least as early as 1973 with Val and Richard Routley’s (later Val Plumwood and Richard Sylvan) Fight for the Forests. By the 1990s, Australian ecological and ecological feminist philosophy was at the forefront of international work in this area. As the 1990s came to a close, this was joined by the first major international research in ecological hermeneutics in biblical studies, the Earth Bible Project, situated in Adelaide, South Australia, under the chief editorship of Norman Habel. The Project was in conversation with feminists, ecologists, and a number of indigenous peoples from Australia and overseas, as the team developed first their six ecojustice principles and then three further ecological hermeneutics. Building on her early work in feminist biblical interpretation, a contributor to the project, biblical scholar Elaine Wainwright, developed a multidimensional hermeneutic, bringing together feminist, ecological, and postcolonial concerns, most recently around the notion of habitat. This chapter first charts a recent history of feminist interpretation of biblical religion and an evolving, but uneven, relationship between feminist and ecological thinking in biblical studies and then explores Wainwright’s writings as indicative of how the postcolonial contexts in Australia and New Zealand have evolved some complex intersections of religion, race, and ecological thought.

Bibliography

  1. Balabanski, Vicky. 2007. Ecological Hermeneutics as a Daughter of Feminism: Reflections on the Earth Bible Project. Women-Church: An Australian Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 40: 145–149.Google Scholar
  2. Brenner, Athalya. 1992. The Hebrew God and His Female Complements. In The Feminist Companion to Mythology, ed. C. Larrington, 48–62. London: Pandora Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brett, Mark G. 2008. Decolonizing God: The Bible in the Tides of Empire. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press.Google Scholar
  4. Byrne, Brendan. 1990. Inheriting the Earth: The Pauline Basis of a Spirituality for Our Time. Homebush, NSW: St. Paul Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Code, Loraine L. 2006. Ecological Thinking: The Politics of Epistemic Location. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Daly, Mary. (1973) 1985. Beyond God the Father: A Philosophy of Women’s Liberation. With an Original Reintroduction by the Author. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  7. Derrida, Jacques. 1994. Given Time: I. Counterfeit Money. Trans. P. Kamuf. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 2000. Of Hospitality. Anne Dufourmantelle Invites Jacques Derrida to Respond. Trans. R. Bowlby. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dowling, Elizabeth, and Veronica Lawson. 2013. Women, Eucharist, and Good News to All Creation in Mark. In Reinterpreting the Eucharist: Explorations in Feminist Theology and Ethics, ed. A. Elvey, C. Hogan, K. Power, and C. Renkin, 78–90. Sheffield: Equinox Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dube, Musa W. 2000. Postcolonial Feminist Interpretation of the Bible. Danvers, MA: Chalice Press.Google Scholar
  11. Eaton, Heather. 2000. Ecofeminist Contributions to an Ecojustice Hermeneutics. In Readings from the Perspective of Earth, ed. N. C. Habel, 54–71. Earth Bible, 1. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Edwards, Denis. 1995. Jesus the Wisdom of God: An Ecological Theology. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.Google Scholar
  13. Elvey, Anne F. 2003. The Material Given: Bodies, Pregnant Bodies and Earth. Australian Feminist Studies 18 (4, July): 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ———. 2004. Earthing the Text? On the Status of the Biblical Text in Ecological Perspective. Australian Biblical Review 52: 64–79.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 2005. An Ecological Feminist Reading of the Gospel of Luke: A Gestational Paradigm. Studies in Women and Religion 45. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 2010. The Bible and the Earth: Toward a Materialist Ecohermeneutics. Colloquium: The Australian and New Zealand Theological Review 42 (2, Nov.): 131–150.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 2011a. The Matter of the Text: Material Engagements Between Luke and the Five Senses. The Bible in the Modern World 37. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2011b. The Matter of Texts: A Material Intertextuality and Ecocritical Engagements with the Bible. In Ecocritical Theory: New European Approaches, ed. A. Goodbody and K. Rigby, 181–193. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
  19. ———. forthcoming a. Ecological Feminist Hermeneutics. In The Oxford Handbook of the Bible and Ecology, ed. H. Marlow and M. Harris. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. ———. forthcoming b. Some Possibilities and Tensions of Feminism and Ecological Criticism. In The Oxford Handbook of Feminist Approaches to the Hebrew Bible, ed. S. Scholz. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gimbutas, Marija. 1974. The Gods and Goddesses of Old Europe, 7000 to 3500 B.C: Myths, Legends and Cult Images. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  22. Habel, Norman C., ed. 2000. Reading the Bible from the Perspective of the Earth. The Earth Bible, 1. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
  23. ———., ed. 2001. The Earth Story in the Psalms and Prophets. The Earth Bible, 4. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. ———., ed. 2009. An Inconvenient Text: Is a Green Reading of the Bible Possible? Hindmarsh, SA: ATF Press.Google Scholar
  25. ———., ed. 2012. Rainbow of Mysteries: Meeting the Sacred in Nature. Kelowna, BC: Copper House.Google Scholar
  26. Habel, Norman C., and Vicky Balabanski, eds. 2002. The Earth Story in the New Testament. The Earth Bible, 5. London: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
  27. Habel, Norman C., and Peter Trudinger, eds. 2008. Exploring Ecological Hermeneutics. SBL Symposium Series 46. Atlanta: SBL.Google Scholar
  28. Habel, Norman C., and Shirley Wurst, eds. 2000. The Earth Story in Genesis. The Earth Bible, 2. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
  29. ———, eds. 2001. The Earth Story in Wisdom Traditions. The Earth Bible, 3. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hadley, Judith M. 1997. From Goddess to Literary Construct: The Transformation of Asherah into Hokmah. In A Feminist Companion to Reading the Bible: Approaches, Methods and Strategies, ed. A. Brenner and C. Fontaine, 360–399. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hampson, Daphne, and Rosemary Radford Ruether. 1987. Is There a Place for Feminists in a Christian Church? New Blackfriars 68 (801, Jan.): 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Haraway, Donna. 2008. When Species Meet. Posthumanities, 3. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hobgood-Oster, Laura. 2001. Wisdom Literature and Ecofeminism. In The Earth Story in Wisdom Traditions, ed. N. C. Habel and S. Wurst, 35–47. The Earth Bible, 3. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
  34. Irigaray, Luce. 1986. Divine Women. Trans. S. Muecke. Sydney: Local Consumption.Google Scholar
  35. Kelly, Anthony. 1993. An Expanding Theology: Faith in a World of Connections. Sydney: E. J. Dwyer.Google Scholar
  36. Levine, Amy-Jill. 2004a. Response. Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 20 (1): 125–132.Google Scholar
  37. ———. 2004b. The Disease of Postcolonial New Testament Studies and the Hermeneutics of Healing. Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 20 (1): 91–99.Google Scholar
  38. Merchant, Carolyn. 1990 [1980]. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology and the Scientific Revolution. Republished with New Preface. San Francisco: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  39. Pattel-Gray, Anne. 1995. Not Yet Tiddas: An Aboriginal Womanist Critique of Australian Church Feminism. In Freedom and Entrapment: Women Thinking Theology, ed. M. Confoy, D. Lee, and J. Nowotny, 165–192. Melbourne: Dove.Google Scholar
  40. ———. 1999. The Hard Truth: White Secrets, Black Realities. Australian Feminist Studies 14 (30): 259–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Plaskow, Judith. 1991. Feminist Anti-Judaism and the Christian God. Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 7 (2, Fall): 99–108.Google Scholar
  42. Plumwood, Val. 1993. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. ———. 2002. Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Primavesi, Anne. 2000. Sacred Gaia: Holistic Theology and Earth System Science. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. ———. 2003. Gaia’s Gift: Earth, Ourselves and God after Copernicus. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Rigby, Kate. 1998. Woman and Nature Revisited: Ecofeminist Reconfigurations of an Old Association. Arena Journal 12: 143–169.Google Scholar
  47. ———. 2001. The Goddess Returns: Ecofeminist Reconfigurations of Gender, Nature and the Sacred. In Feminist Poetics of the Sacred: Creative Suspicions, ed. F. D. Glass and L. McCreddin, 23–54. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. ———. 2004. Earth, World, Text: On the (Im)Possibility of Ecopoiesis. New Literary History 35: 427–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. ———. 2008. Noah’s Ark Revisited: (Counter-)Utopianism and (Eco-)Catastrophe. Arena Journal 31: 163–177.Google Scholar
  50. ———. 2014. ‘Come Forth into the Light of Things’: Material Spirit as Negative Poetics. In Material Spirit: Religion and Literature Intranscendent, ed. G. C. Stallings, M. Asensi, and C. Good, 111–128. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  51. ———. 2015. Dancing with Disaster: Environmental Histories, Narratives, and Ethics for Perilous Times. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
  52. Rose, Deborah Bird, Thom van Dooren, Matthew Chrulew, Stuart Cooke, Matthew Kearnes, and Emily O’Gorman. 2012. Thinking through the Environment: Unsettling the Humanities. Environmental Humanities 1 (1): 1–5. http://environmentalhumanities.org/arch/vol1/EH1.1.pdf
  53. Routley, Richard, and Val Routley. 1973. The Fight for the Forests: The Takeover of Australian Forests for Pine, Wood Chips, and Intensive Forestry. Canberra: Australian Research School of Social Sciences.Google Scholar
  54. Ruether, Rosemary Radford. 1983. Sexism and God-Talk: Toward a Feminist Theology. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
  55. ———. 1992. Gaia and God: An Ecofeminist Theology of Earth Healing. San Francisco: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  56. Schüssler Fiorenza, Elisabeth. 1983. In Memory of Her: A Feminist Theological Reconstruction of Christian Origins. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
  57. ———. 1992. But She Said: Feminist Practices of Biblical Interpretation. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  58. Sittler, Joseph. 2004 [1964]. The Care of the Earth. Adapted from The Care of the Earth and Other University Sermons. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  59. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1993. French Feminism Revisited. In Outside in the Teaching Machine, 141–172. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. Stanton, Elizabeth Cady. 1897. Letter from Elizabeth Cady Stanton. In Memoriam: Frederick Douglass, ed. H. Douglass, 44–45. Philadelphia: J.C. Yorston & Co. http://antislavery.eserver.org/legacies/frederick-douglass-elizabeth-cady-stanton/frederick-douglass-elizabeth-cady-stanton-pdf
  61. ———. ed. 1993. The Woman’s Bible. 2 vols. First published New York: European Publishing C., 1895–1898. Republished with a forward by Maureen Fitzgerald. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Starhawk. 1989 [1979]. The Spiral Dance: A Rebirth of the Ancient Religion of the Great Goddess. 10th Anniversary Edition. San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco.Google Scholar
  63. Trible, Phyllis. 1978. God and the Rhetoric of Sexuality. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  64. ———. 1984. Texts of Terror. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
  65. Wainwright, Elaine M. 1991a. Towards a Feminist Critical Reading of the Gospel According to Matthew. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. ———. 1991b. A Metaphorical Walk through Scripture in an Ecological Age. Pacifica 4 (3): 273–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. ———. 1995. A Voice from the Margin: Reading Matthew 15:21–28 in an Australian Feminist Key. In Reading from this Place, Vol. 2: Social Location and Biblical Interpretation in Global Perspective, ed. F. S. Segovia and M. A. Tolbert, 132–154. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress.Google Scholar
  68. ———. 1997. Rachel Weeping for Her Children: Intertextuality and the Biblical Testaments—A Feminist Approach. In A Feminist Companion to Reading the Bible: Approaches, Methods and Strategies, ed. A. Brenner and C. Fontaine, 452–469. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
  69. ———. 1998. Shall We Look for Another? A Feminist Rereading of the Matthean Jesus. Maryknoll: Orbis Books.Google Scholar
  70. ———. 2000. A Transformative Struggle towards the Divine Dream: An Ecofeminist Reading of Matthew 11. In Reading the Bible from the Perspective of the Earth, ed. N. C. Habel, 162–173. The Earth Bible, 1. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
  71. ———. 2002. Which Intertext? A Response to an Ecojustice Challenge: Is Earth Valued in John 1? In The Earth Story in the New Testament, ed. N. Habel and V. Balabanski, 83–88. The Earth Bible, 5. London: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
  72. ———. 2003. The Pouring Out of Healing Ointment: Rereading Mark 14:3–9. In Toward a New Heaven and a New Earth: Essays in Honor of Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza, ed. F. F. Sergovia, 157–178. Maryknoll: Orbis Books.Google Scholar
  73. ———. 2005. Looking Both Ways or in Multiple Directions: Doing/teaching Theology in Context into the Twenty-first Century. Pacifica 18 (2): 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. ———. 2006. Women Healing/Healing Women: The Genderization of Healing in Early Christianity. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
  75. ———. 2008a. Healing Ointment/Healing Bodies: Gift and Identification in an Ecofeminist Reading of Mark 14:3–9. In Exploring Ecological Hermeneutics, ed. N. C. Habel and P. Trudinger, 131–140. SBL Symposium Series, 46. Atlanta: SBL.Google Scholar
  76. ———. 2008b. Unbound Hair and Ointmented Feet: An Ecofeminist Reading of Luke 7.36–50. In Exchanges of Grace. Festschrift for Ann Loades, ed. N. K. Watson and S. Burns, 178–189. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
  77. ———. 2009. The Book of the Genealogy: How Shall We Read It? Concilium 3. In Eco-Theology (themed issue), ed. E. Wainwright, L. C. Susin and F. Wilfred, 13–23.Google Scholar
  78. ———. 2012. Images, Words, Stories: Exploring Their Transformative Power in Reading Biblical Texts Ecologically. Biblical Interpretation 20: 280–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. ———. 2013. Of Borders, Bread, Dogs and Demons: Reading Matthew 15.21–28 Ecologically. In Where the Wild Ox Roams: Biblical Essays in Honour of Norman C. Habel, ed. A. H. Cadwallader and P. Trudinger, 114–128. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press.Google Scholar
  80. ———. 2015. Queer[y]ing the Sermon on the Mount. In Sexuality, Ideology and the Bible Antipodean Engagements, ed. R. J. Myles and C. Blyth, 115–131. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix.Google Scholar
  81. ———. 2016. Habitat, Human, and Holy: An Eco-Rhetorical Reading of the Gospel of Matthew. The Earth Bible Commentary Series. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix.Google Scholar
  82. White, Lynn. 1967. The Historical Roots of our Ecological Crisis. Science 155 (3767, Mar.): 1203–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne Elvey
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Monash UniversityClaytonAustralia
  2. 2.University of DivinityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations