Advertisement

23 Intracranial Aneurysms

  • Nikolai J. Hopf
  • Paul A. GardnerEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Applying the keyhole principle (discussed in section “Intracranial Aneurysms: Keyhole Transcranial Approaches”), the vast majority of unruptured and ruptured aneurysms can be successfully treated using limited keyhole craniotomies. Suitable keyhole craniotomies for aneurysm surgery are the supraorbital, mini-pterional, interhemispheric, subtemporal, retrosigmoid and median suboccipital keyhole approaches. The most frequently used keyhole craniotomy for aneurysms is the supraorbital keyhole approach (SOKA). The most important limitations of keyhole craniotomies are: (1) limited ability to change the surgical trajectory during the operation, (2) restricted maneuverability of instruments and (3) impaired visualization based on the limited opening. Thus, meticulous preoperative planning and the use of endoscopes as well as specific keyhole instruments are mandatory. Good outcomes could be achieved in 96.5% of patients with unruptured aneurysms treated through keyhole craniotomies with an endoscopic-assisted technique. The endoscope provided important visual information that led to clip repositioning in 19.1% of cases. Cosmetic results in patients treated via a SOKA were rated very satisfactory by 84% or satisfactory by 8.8% and no or only little postoperative discomfort was reported by 89.3% of the patients. Permanent morbidity was frontal hypesthesia in 3.4%, hyposmia in 2.1% and palsy of the frontalis muscle in 2.1% in this group. In general, a trend for fewer complications was associated with surgical treatment of aneurysms using keyhole craniotomies. Endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) for the clipping of intracranial aneurysms (discussed in section “Intracranial Aneurysms: Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches”) is a relatively new but controversial topic in cerebrovascular surgery. In recent years, various authors have reported successful results utilizing the EEA to treat vascular lesions for specific, well-selected cases. Advantages of the EEA include improved visualization, elimination of brain retraction, decreased manipulation of adjacent neurovascular structures, improved cosmesis and quicker recovery. However, concerns regarding the ability to manage intra-operative rupture as well as the difficulty in performing such delicate maneuvers in a long, narrow nasal corridor, a lack of familiarity with endonasal anatomy and adequate instrumentation have created hesitation among most cerebrovascular surgeons. Despite these difficulties, well-selected patients can have excellent results with this technique when applied by experienced teams. The strengths and weaknesses of utilizing the EEA for aneurysm clipping along with our indications for patient selection, surgical technique and outcomes reported in the literature to date are outlined.

Keywords

Keyhole Approach Aneurysm surgery Supraorbital Craniotomy Minimal Invasive Neurosurgery Endoscopy Endoscope-assisted Microsurgery Cosmetic Outcome Aneurysm clipping Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysm Basilar Rupture Cerebrovascular Surgery Endoscopic Endonasal Paraclinoid Aneurysm 

References (Key References Bolded)

  1. 1.
    Vernooij MW, Ikram MA, Tanghe HL, et al. Incidental findings on brain MRI in the general population. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1821–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vlak MH, Algra A, Brandenburg R, Rinkel GJ. Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, with emphasis on sex, age, comorbidity, country, and time period: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:626–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alshekhlee A, Mehta S, Edgell RC, Vora N, Feen E, Mohammadi A, et al. Hospital mortality and complications of electively clipped or coiled unruptured intracranial aneurysm. Stroke. 2010;41(7):1471–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wiebers DO, International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators (ISUIA). Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet. 2003;362:103–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Falk Delgado A, Andersson T, Falk DA. Clinical outcome after surgical clipping or endovascular coiling for cerebral aneurysms: a pragmatic meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized trials with short- and long-term follow-up. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9(3):264–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fischer G, Stadie A, Reisch R, Hopf NJ, Fries G, Böcher-Schwarz H, et al. The keyhole concept in aneurysm surgery: results of the past 20 years. Neurosurgery. 2011;68(1 Suppl Operative):45–51; discussion 51.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hopf NJ, Füllbier L. Minimally invasive neurosurgery for vascular lesions. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2010;21(4):673–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reisch R, Fischer G, Stadie A, Kockro R, Cesnulis E, Hopf N. The supraorbital endoscopic approach for aneurysms. World Neurosurg. 2014;82(6S):130–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reisch R, Stadie A, Kockro RA, Hopf N. The keyhole concept in neurosurgery. World Neurosurg. 2013;79(2 Suppl):S17.e9–13.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Edjlali M, Gentric J-C, Régent-Rodriguez C, Trystram D, Hassen WB, Lion S, et al. Does aneurysmal wall enhancement on vessel wall MRI help to distinguish stable from unstable intracranial aneurysms? Stroke. 2014;45:3704–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Musahl C, Weissbach C, Hopf NJ. Neuromonitoringin. In: Spetzler, Kalani, Nakaji, editors. Neurovascular Surgery. 2nd ed. Stuttgart-New York: Thieme; 2015.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hopf NJ, Perneczky A. Endoscopic neurosurgery and endoscope-assisted microneurosurgery for the treatment of intracranial cysts. Neurosurgery. 1998;43:1330–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zacharia BE, Bruce SS, Carpenter AM, Hickman ZL, Vaughan KA, Richards C, et al. Variability in outcome after elective cerebral aneurysm repair in high-volume academic medical centers. Stroke. 2014;45:1447–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hopf NJ, Stadie A, Reisch R. Management of bilateral middle cerebral artery aneurysms via a unilateral supraorbital key-hole craniotomy. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2009;52(3):126–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reisch R, Marcus HJ, Hugelshofer M, Koechlin NO, Stadie A, Kockro RA. Patients’ cosmetic satisfaction, pain, and functional outcomes after supraorbital craniotomy through an eyebrow incision. J Neurosurg. 2014;121(3):730–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kassam AB, Mintz AH, Gardner PA, Horowitz MB, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH. The expanded endonasal approach for an endoscopic transnasal clipping and aneurysmorrhaphy of a large vertebral artery aneurysm: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2006;59:ONSE162–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kassam AB, Gardner PA, Mintz A, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Horowitz M. Endoscopic endonasal clipping of an unsecured superior hypophyseal artery aneurysm. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 2007;107:1047–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kitano M, Taneda M. Extended transsphenoidal approach to anterior communicating artery aneurysm: aneurysm incidentally identified during macroadenoma resection: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2007;61:E299–300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ensenat J, Alobid I, de Notaris M, Sanchez M, Valero R, Prats-Galino A, et al. Endoscopic endonasal clipping of a ruptured vertebral-posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysm: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2011;69:onsE121–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Froelich S, Cebula H, Debry C, Boyer P. Anterior communicating artery aneurysm clipped via an endoscopic endonasal approach: technical note. Neurosurgery. 2011;68:310–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Germanwala AV, Zanation AM. Endoscopic endonasal approach for clipping of ruptured and unruptured paraclinoid cerebral aneurysms: case report. Neurosurgery. 2011;68:234–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Drazin D, Zhuang L, Schievink WI, Mamelak AN. Expanded endonasal approach for the clipping of a ruptured basilar aneurysm and feeding artery to a cerebellar arteriovenous malformation. J Clin Neurosci. 2012;19:144–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Somanna S, Babu RA, Srinivas D, Rao KVLN, Vazhayil V. Extended endoscopic endonasal transclival clipping of posterior circulation aneurysms: an alternative to the transcranial approach. Acta Neurochir. 2015;157:2077–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gardner PA, Vaz-Guimaraes F, Jankowitz B, Koutourousiou M, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Wang EW, et al. Endoscopic endonasal clipping of intracranial aneurysms: surgical technique and results. World Neurosurg. 2015;84(5):1380–93.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yildirim AE, Divanlioglu D, Karaoglu D, Cetinalp NE, Belen AD. Purely endoscopic endonasal clipping of an incidental anterior communicating artery aneurysm. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(4):1378–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vaz-Guimaraes F, Su SY, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Wang EW, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH. Hemostasis in endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. J Neurol Surg – Part B. 2015;76:296–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gardner PA, Tormenti MJ, Pant H, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Snyderman CH, Horowitz MB. Carotid artery injury during endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: incidence and outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2013;73(2 Suppl Operative):261–9.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Snyderman C, Kassam A, Carrau R, Mintz A, Gardner P, Prevedello DM. Acquisition of surgical skills for endonasal skull base surgery: a training program. Laryngoscope. 2007;117:699–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vaz-Guimaraes F, Rastelli MM Jr., Fernandez-Miranda JC, Wang EW, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH. Impact of dynamic endoscopy and bimanual-binarial dissection in endoscopic endonasal surgery training: a laboratory investigation. J Neurol Surg Part B. 2015;76(B5):365–71.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL, Mataza JC, Kassam A, Snyderman CH, et al. A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope. 2006;116:1882–6.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Harvey RJ, Parmar P, Sacks R, Zanation AM. Endoscopic skull base reconstruction of large dural defects: a systematic review of published evidence. Laryngoscope. 2012;122:452–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fernandez-Miranda JC, Gardner PA, Rastelli MM Jr, Peris-Celda M, Koutourousiou M, Peace D, et al. Endoscopic endonasal transcavernous posterior clinoidectomy with interdural pituitary transposition. J Neurosurg. 2014;121(1): 91–9.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fernandez-Miranda JC, Tormenti M, Latorre F, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH. Endoscopic endonasal middle clinoidectomy: anatomic, radiological, and technical note. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(2):ons233–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Drake CG. The surgical treatment of vertebral-basilar aneurysms. Clin Neurosurg. 1969;16:114–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Snyderman CH, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Gardner PA. Training in neurorhinology; the impact of case volume on the learning curve. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2011;44(5):1223–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Koutourousiou M, Garnder PA, Tormenti MJ, Henry SL, Stefko ST, Kassam AB, et al. Endoscopic endonasal approach for resection of skull base chordomas: outcomes and learning curve. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(3):614–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Snyderman CH, Pant H, Kassam AB, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM, Gardner PA. The learning curve for endonasal surgery of the cranial base: a systematic approach to training. In: Kassam AB, Gardner PA, editors. Endoscopic approaches to the skull base. Progress in neurological surgery, vol. 26. Basel: Karger; 2012.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Vaz-Guimaraes F, Gardner PA, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Wang E, Snyderman CH. Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery for vascular lesions: a systematic review of the literature. J Neurosurg Sci. 2016;60(4):503–13.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, Hirslanden Private HospitalZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Center for Cranial Base Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations