A Unified Framework to Predict Movement

  • Olga Gkountouna
  • Dieter Pfoser
  • Carola Wenk
  • Andreas Züfle
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10411)

Abstract

In the current data-centered era, there are many highly diverse data sources that provide information about movement on networks, such as GPS trajectories, traffic flow measurements, farecard data, pedestrian cameras, bike-share data and even geo-social movement trajectories. The challenge identified in this vision paper is to create a unified framework for aggregating and analyzing such diverse and uncertain movement data on networks. This requires probabilistic models to capture flow/volume and movement probabilities on a network over time. Novel algorithms are required to train these models from datasets with varying levels of uncertainty. By combining information from different networks, immediate applications of such a unifying movement model include optimal site planning, map construction, traffic management, and emergency management.

References

  1. 1.
    Abadi, A., Rajabioun, T., Ioannou, P.A.: Traffic flow prediction for road transportation networks with limited traffic data. IEEE ITS 16(2), 653–662 (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chertoff, M.: Statement by homeland security secretary Michael Chertoff before the United States house select committee on hurricane Katrina. Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    De Longueville, B., Smith, R.S., Luraschi, G.: OMG, from here, I can see the flames!: a use case of mining location based social networks to acquire spatio-temporal data on forest fires. In: LBSN, pp. 73–80. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goodchild, M.F.: Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. Geo J. 69(4), 211–221 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Helbing, D., Mukerji, P.: Crowd disasters as systemic failures: analysis of the love parade disaster. EPJ Data Sci. 1(1), 1–40 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jeung, H., Yiu, M.L., Zhou, X., Jensen, C.S.: Path prediction and predictive range querying in road network databases. VLDB J. 19(4), 585–602 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kriegel, H.-P., Renz, M., Schubert, M., Züfle, A.: Statistical density prediction in traffic networks. In: SDM, vol. 8, pp. 200–211. SIAM (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Niedermayer, J., Züfle, A., Emrich, T., Renz, M., Mamoulis, N., Chen, L., Kriegel, H.-P.: Probabilistic nearest neighbor queries on uncertain moving object trajectories. Proc. VLDB Endowment 7(3), 205–216 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pfoser, D., Jensen, C.S.: Capturing the uncertainty of moving-object representations. In: Güting, R.H., Papadias, D., Lochovsky, F. (eds.) SSD 1999. LNCS, vol. 1651, pp. 111–131. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). doi:10.1007/3-540-48482-5_9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vieweg, S., Hughes, A.L., Starbird, K., Palen, L.: Microblogging during two natural hazards events: what twitter may contribute to situational awareness. In: SIGCHI, pp. 1079–1088. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang, J., Zheng, Y., Qi, D.: Deep spatio-temporal residual networks for citywide crowd flows prediction. In: AAAI 2017, pp. 1655–1661 (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olga Gkountouna
    • 1
  • Dieter Pfoser
    • 1
  • Carola Wenk
    • 2
  • Andreas Züfle
    • 1
  1. 1.George Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  2. 2.Tulane UniversityNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations