Increasing the Value of Remote Laboratory Federations Through an Open Sharing Platform: LabsLand

  • Pablo OrduñaEmail author
  • Luis Rodriguez-Gil
  • Javier Garcia-Zubia
  • Ignacio Angulo
  • Unai Hernandez
  • Esteban Azcuenaga
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 22)


A remote laboratory is a software and hardware tool that enables students to access real equipment located somewhere else through the Internet. This equipment is usually located in universities, schools or research centers. During the last couple of decades, different initiatives have emerged dealing with the development and management of remote laboratories, their integration in learning management systems or their sharing. This last point is particularly relevant, since remote labs are a clear example of excess capacity: since they are usually used only some hours a day, some weeks a year, they could be shared among institutions to reduce costs or to increase the offer of experiential learning. However, despite this fact, the overall impact of these laboratories is fairly limited beyond the scope of the host institution or the scope (and duration) of projects in which the host institution is involved. The focus of this contribution is to outline a set of potential reasons for this fact, and solutions that are being developed to tackle them. After over 10 years working on the area, the WebLab-Deusto research group has started a spin-off focused on this topic, called LabsLand. A key factor of this spin-off is to provide a platform similar to other sharing economy marketplaces, aiming to provide features commonly ignored in the remote laboratories literature such as trust, accurate reliability or different pricing schemes for different scenarios; as well as the laboratories that are being initially provided.


  1. 1.
    Aktan, B., Bohus, C., Crowl, L., Shor, M.: Distance learning applied to control engineering laboratories. IEEE Trans. Educ. 39(3), 320–326 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Böckmann, M.: The shared economy: it is time to start caring about sharing; value creating factors in the shared economy. In: 1st IBA BT Conference, vol. 1 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cao, Y., Tsourlidaki, E., Edlin-White, R., Dikke, D., Faltin, N., Sotiriou, S., Gillet, D.: Stem teachers community building through a social tutoring platform. In: Advances in Web-Based Learning, ICWL 2015, pp. 238–244. Springer (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bohus, C., Crowl, L.A., Aktan, B., Shor, M.H.: Running control engineering experiments over the Internet. IFAC Proc. Vol. 29(1), 2919–2927 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cedazo, R., Sanchez, F., Sebastian, J., Martínez, A., Pinazo, A., Barros, B., Read, T.: Ciclope chemical: a remote laboratory to control a spectrograph. In: Advances in Control Education, ACE (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coble, A., Smallbone, A., Bhave, A., Watson, R., Braumann, A., Kraft, M.: Delivering authentic experiences for engineering students and professionals through e-labs. In: 2010 IEEE Education Engineering (EDUCON), pp. 1085–1090. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Del Alamo, J., Brooks, L., McLean, C., Hardison, J., Mishuris, G., Chang, V., Hui, L.: The MIT microelectronics weblab: a web-enabled remote laboratory for microelectronic device characterization. In: World Congress on Networked Learning in a Global Environment, Berlin, Germany (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dikke, D., Tsourlidaki, E., Zervas, P., Cao, Y., Faltin, N., Sotiriou, S., Sampson, D.G.: Golabz: towards a federation of online labs for inquiry-based science education at school. In: 6th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (EDULEARN) (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dziabenko, O., García-Zubia, J., Angulo, I.: Time to play with a microcontroller managed mobile bot. In: 2012 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 1–5. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gebbia, J.: How Airbnb designs for trust. In: TED Talks, February 2016Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Geer, D.: Taking steps to secure web services. Computer 36(10), 14–16 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gillet, D., Latchman, H., Salzmann, C., Crisalle, O.: Hands-on laboratory experiments in flexible and distance learning. J. Eng. Educ. 90(2), 187–191 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gillet, D., de Jong, T., Sotirou, S., Salzmann, C.: Personalised learning spaces and federated online labs for stem education at school. In: 2013 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 769–773. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gomes, L., Bogosyan, S.: Current trends in remote laboratories. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 56(12), 4744–4756 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gordillo Méndez, A., Barra Arias, E., Quemada Vives, J.: Enhancing k-12 science education through a multi-device web tool to facilitate content integration and e-infrastructure access. In: 7th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (INTED2013), 04–05 March 2013, Valencia, Spain, pp. 5432–5440 (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gravier, C., Fayolle, J., Bayard, B., Ates, M., Lardon, J.: State of the art about remote laboratories paradigms-foundations of ongoing mutations. iJOE 4(1) (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gustavsson, I., Zackrisson, J., Håkansson, L., Claesson, I., Lagö, T.: The VISIR project–an open source software initiative for distributed online laboratories. In: Proceedings of the REV 2007 Conference, Porto, Portugal (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hardison, J., DeLong, K., Bailey, P., Harward, V.: Deploying interactive remote labs using the ilab shared architecture. In: 38th Annual Conference on Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 2008, p. S2A–1. IEEE (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hardt, D.: The OAuth 2.0 authorization framework (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Henry, J.: Running laboratory experiments via the world wide web. In: ASEE Annual Conference (1996)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    de Jong, T., Linn, M.C., Zacharia, Z.C.: Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science 340(6130), 305–308 (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lowe, D., Machet, T., Kostulski, T.: UTS Remote Labs, Labshare, and the Sahara architecture. Using Remote Labs in Education: Two Little Ducks in Remote Experimentation, p. 403 (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lowe, D., de la Villefromoy, M., Jona, K., Yeoh, L.: Remote laboratories: uncovering the true costs. In: 2012 9th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (REV), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Martínez-Polo, J., Martínez-Sánchez, J.T., Vivó, J.M.N.: Participation and sharing economy: The Spanish case of #compartirmola. In: Entrepreneurship, Business and Economics, vol. 1, pp. 15–22. Springer (2016)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Matzner, M., Chasin, F., von Hoffen, M., Plenter, F., et al.: Designing a peer-to-peer sharing service as fuel for the development of the electric vehicle charging infrastructure. In: 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 1587–1595. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Milošević, M., Milošević, D., Dimopoulos, C., Katzis, K.: Security challenges in delivery of remote experiments. XXII Skup TRENDOVI RAZVOJA: NOVE TEHNOLOGIJE U NASTAVI, Zlatibor, 16–19 Feb 2016Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nedic, Z., Machotka, J., Nafalski, A.: Remote laboratory netlab for effective interaction with real equipment over the internet. In: 2008 Conference on Human System Interactions, pp. 846–851. IEEE (2008)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Orduña, P.: Transitive and scalable federation model for remote laboratories. Ph.D. thesis, Universidad de Deusto, Bilbao, Spain, May 2013.
  29. 29.
    Orduña, P., Almeida, A., Ros, S., Lpez-de Ipiña, D., García-Zubia, J.: Leveraging non-explicit social communities for learning analytics in mobile remote laboratories. J. Univers. Comput. Sci. 20(15), 2043–2053 (2014)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Orduña, P., Bailey, P., DeLong, K., López-de Ipiña, D., García-Zubia, J.: Towards federated interoperable bridges for sharing educational remote laboratories. Comput. Hum. Behav. 30, 389–395 (2014).
  31. 31.
    Orduña, P., Botero Uribe, S., Hock Isaza, N., Sancristobal, E., Emaldi, M., Pesquera Martin, A., DeLong, K., Bailey, P., López-de Ipiña, D., Castro, M., García-Zubia, J.: Generic integration of remote laboratories in learning and content management systems through federation protocols. In: 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Oklahoma City, OK, USA, pp. 1372–1378, October 2013Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Orduña, P., Garbi Zutin, D., Govaerts, S., Lequerica Zorrozua, I., Bailey, P.H., Sancristobal, E., Salzmann, C., Rodriguez-Gil, L., DeLong, K., Gillet, D., et al.: An extensible architecture for the integration of remote and virtual laboratories in public learning tools. Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de 10(4), 223–233 (2015)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Orduña, P., Lerro, F., Bailey, P., Marchisio, S., DeLong, K., Perreta, E., Dziabenko, O., Angulo, I., López-de Ipiña, D., Garcia-Zubia, J.: Exploring complex remote laboratory ecosystems through interoperable federation chains. In: 2013 IEEE Education Engineering (EDUCON). IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Richter, T., Boehringer, D., Jeschke, S.: LiLa: a European project on networked experiments. Autom. Commun. Cybernet. Sci. Eng. 2009(2010), 307–317 (2011)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Safaric, R., Truntič, M., Hercog, D., Pačnik, G.: Control and robotics remote laboratory for engineering education. Int. J. Online Eng. (iJOE) 1(1) (2005)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Santana, I., Ferre, M., Izaguirre, E., Aracil, R., Hernandez, L.: Remote laboratories for education and research purposes in automatic control systems. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 9(1), 547–556 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schauer, F., Krbecek, M., Beno, P., Gerza, M., Palka, L., Spilakov, P., Tkac, L.: Remlabnet iii – federated remote laboratory management system for university and secondary schools. In: 2016 13th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (REV), pp. 238–241. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Simão, J.P.S., et al.: Relle: Sistema de gerenciamento de experimentos remotos (2016)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Titov, I.: on–line laboratories platform. In: 2013 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 1137–1140. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Torres, F., Candelas, F., Puente, S., Pomares, J., Gil, P., Ortiz, F.: Experiences with virtual environment and remote laboratory for teaching and learning robotics at the University of Alicante. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 22(4), 766–776 (2006)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zappatore, M., Longo, A., Bochicchio, M.A.: Enabling MOOL in acoustics by mobile crowd-sensing paradigm. In: 2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 733–740. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zappatore, M., Longo, A., Bochicchio, M.A., Zappatore, D., Morrone, A.A., De Mitri, G.: Mobile crowd sensing-based noise monitoring as a way to improve learning quality on acoustics. In: 2015 International Conference on Interactive Mobile Communication Technologies and Learning (IMCL), pp. 96–100. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zervas, G., Proserpio, D., Byers, J.: A first look at online reputation on Airbnb, where every stay is above average. Where Every Stay is Above Average, 23 January 2015Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pablo Orduña
    • 1
    Email author
  • Luis Rodriguez-Gil
    • 1
  • Javier Garcia-Zubia
    • 2
  • Ignacio Angulo
    • 1
  • Unai Hernandez
    • 1
  • Esteban Azcuenaga
    • 3
  1. 1.DeustoTech - Deusto Institute of TechnologyBilbaoSpain
  2. 2.Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of DeustoBilbaoSpain
  3. 3.LabsLandBilbaoSpain

Personalised recommendations