Advertisement

Omphaloplasty pp 105-125 | Cite as

Emulation of a Newborn’s Umbilical Scar

  • William L. Murillo
Chapter

Abstract

Background: Since the early ages of modern abdominoplasty, surgeons have paid special attention to the aesthetic aspects of the umbilicus. Studies have reported a variety of efforts to recreate a natural-looking belly button. This chapter presents another approach in this surgical field, which emulates the natural healing course of a newborn’s navel.

Method: After performing abdominal undermining, the position of the new navel is marked. A vertical incision of 2 cm is then made, and the subcutaneous cylinder-shaped tissue is resected. The umbilical stalk is tied at approximately 0.5 cm above its implantation and the distal portion is ablated. About 3 mm behind the borders of the incision, a 2-0 silk or 2-0 Monosyn suture is used to subdermally sew four cardinal points of the umbilical stalk to the abdominal flap. The points corresponding to 3 and 9 o’clock are also anchored to the aponeurosis of the rectus abdominis muscle using inverted knots.

Results: The healed neo-umbilicus has an incredibly natural appearance and is barely distinguishable from a nonoperated umbilicus.

Conclusion: The natural appearance obtained in this procedure will help to change the way that this important, yet stigmatized, component of abdominoplasty is viewed and treated in the future.

Keywords

Omphaloplasty Umbilicoplasty Neo-umbilicoplasty Neo-omphaloplasty Abdominoplasty 

Supplementary material

420884_1_En_8_MOESM1_ESM.rar (861.3 mb)
Data 1 (RAR 882004 kb)
Video 1

(MOV 935519 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Pardo ML, Chamorro JJ. Neoumbilicoplasty through a purse-string suture of three defatted flaps. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1997;21(5):349–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abhyankar SV, Rajguru AG, Patil PA. Anatomical localization of the umbilicus: an indian study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(4):1153–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Massiha H, Motegut W, Phillips R. A method of reconstructing a natural-looking umbilicus in abdominoplasty. Ann Plast Surg. 1997;38(3):228–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee MJ, Mustoe TA. Simplified technique for creating a youthful umbilicus in abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109(6):2136–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baack BR, Anson G, Nachbar JM, White DJ. Umbilicoplasty; the construction of a new umbilicus and correction of umbilical stenosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;97(1):227–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schoeller T, Wechselberger G, Otto A, et al. New technique of scarless umbilical reinsertion in abdominoplasty procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102(5):1720–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barreto L, Londoño G, Salazar D. Neoumbilicoplastia: técnica de tres suturas. Descripción de una técnica quirúrgica. Rev Soc Col Cir Plast. 2008;14(1):43–58.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kurul S, Uzunismail A. A simple technique to determine the future location of the umbilicus in abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100(3):753–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hoffman S. A simple technique for location the umbilicus in abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;83(3):537–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pitchon L, Rubinstein C. A more A simple technique for location the umbilicus in abdominoplasty. Aust N Z J Surg. 1993;63(1):42–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Juri J, Juri C, Raiden G. Reconstruction of the umbilicus in abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;63(4):580–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Niranjan NS, Staiano JJ. An anatomical method for re-siting the umbilicus. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113(7):2194–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mazzocchi M, Dessy LA, Figus A. A versatile technique for repositioning of the umbilicus in abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(5):357e–8e.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lim TC, Tan WTL. Managing the umbilicus during abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;98(6):1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rozen SM, Redett R. The two-dermal-flap umbilical transposition: a natural and aesthetic umbilicus after abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(7):2255–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baroudi R. Body sculpturing. Clin Plast Surg. 1984;11(3):419–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Park S, Hata Y, Ito O, Tokioka K, Kagawa K. Umbilical reconstruction after repair of omphalocele and gastroschisis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104(1):204–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Craig SB, Faller MS, Puckett CL. In search of the ideal female umbilicus. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:389–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Akbas H, Güneren E, Eroglu L, Uysal OA. Natural-looking umbilicus as important part of abdominoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2003;27:139–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • William L. Murillo
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Science CenterLouisiana State UniversityNew OrleansUSA
  2. 2.Colombian Society of Plastic SurgeryUniversidad del ValleCaliColombia

Personalised recommendations