Advertisement

On the Feasibility of Using Electronic Textiles to Support Embodied Learning

  • Olivia OjuroyeEmail author
  • Adriana Wilde
Chapter

Abstract

Electronic textiles (e-textiles) have already proven their practical use in wearable garments and are now also beginning to feature in non-wearable items, such as in furniture and shared surfaces inside a smart home or driverless car interiors. E-textiles, whether worn or not, have the potential to support their users’ embodied learning on a variety of topics. Embodied learning can be supported with e-textiles being part of an Internet of Things (IoT) ecosystem, providing contextual information within a network capturing traces of behavioural and even biological data about its users. Individuals’ “digital identity” expands as the number of connected devices each individual possesses grows. Furthermore, using artificial intelligence (AI), increasingly personalised experiences can be tailored to users through the very devices they interact with. To ensure e-textiles’ data can be useful for this purpose, e-textiles need to be engineered to integrate with everyday activities and lifestyles. In particular, this chapter will examine e-textiles’ potential to be used as pedagogical conduit to facilitate individualised embodied learning experiences.

Keywords

Electronic textiles Embodied learning Education Internet of Things Artificial intelligence 

References

  1. Baker, N., Zafar, M., Moltchanov, B., & Knappmeyer, M. (2009). Context-aware systems and implications for future internet. In Future internet assembly (pp. 335–344). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barakat, S. M. (2016). Internet of things: Ecosystem and applications. Journal of Current Research in Science, 4(1), 32.Google Scholar
  3. Bates, A. T. (2005). Technology, e-learning and distance education. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhatia, A. (2016). Interactive garments: Flexible technologies for textile integration. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 10(3), 783–788.Google Scholar
  5. Bonomi, F., Milito, R., Natarajan, P., & Zhu, J. (2014). Fog computing: A platform for internet of things and analytics. In Big data and internet of things: A roadmap for smart environments (pp. 169–186). Cham: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bränzel, A., Holz, C., Hoffmann, D., Schmidt, D., Knaust, M., Lühne, P., & Baudisch, P. (2013). GravitySpace: Tracking users and their poses in a smart room using a pressure-sensing floor. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 725–734). New York: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruce, R. F., Brock, J. D., & Reiser, S. L. (2015). Make space for the Pi. In SoutheastCon 2015 (pp. 1–6). Memphis: IEEE.Google Scholar
  8. Bugeja, M. J. (2006). Facing the facebook. The chronicle of higher education 52.21: C1.Google Scholar
  9. Carvalho, N. B., Georgiadis, A., Costanzo, A., Rogier, H., Collado, A., Garcia, J. A., & Boaventura, A. J. S. (2014). Wireless power transmission: R&D activities within Europe. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 62(4), 1031–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cherenack, K., Zysset, C., Kinkeldei, T., Münzenrieder, N., & Tröster, G. (2010). Woven electronic fibers with sensing and display functions for smart textiles. Advanced Materials, 22(45), 5178–5182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chiang, M., Ha, S., Chih-Lin, I., Risso, F., & Zhang, T. (2017). Clarifying fog computing and networking: 10 questions and answers. IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(4), 18–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Freitas, S. & Levene, M. (2003). Evaluating the development of wearable devices, personal data assistants and the use of other mobile devices in further and higher education institutions. JISC Technology and Standards Watch Report, (TWW030), 1–21.Google Scholar
  13. Dixon, M., & Senior, K. (2011). Appearing pedagogy: From embodied learning and teaching to embodied pedagogy. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 19(3), 473–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dobbelstein, D., Winkler, C., Haas, G., & Rukzio, E. (2017). PocketThumb: A wearable dual-sided touch interface for cursor-based control of smart-eyewear. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 1(2), 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fisher, T. (1999). A new professionalism? Teacher use of multimedia portable computers with internet capability. Paper presented at SITE 99. (ERIC Document No. 432268)Google Scholar
  16. Gupta, H., Vahid Dastjerdi, A., Ghosh, S. K., & Buyya, R. (2017). iFogSim: A toolkit for modeling and simulation of resource management techniques in the internet of things, edge and fog computing environments. Software: Practice and Experience, 47(9), 1275–1296.Google Scholar
  17. Kivikunnas, S., Strömmer, E., Korkalainen, M., Heikkilä, T., & Haverinen, M. (2010). Sensing sofa and its ubiquitous use. In Information and communication technology convergence (ICTC), 2010 international conference on (pp. 559–562). Piscataway: IEEE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Knight, H. M., Gajendragadkar, P. R., & Bokhari, A. (2015). Wearable technology: Using Google Glass as a teaching tool. BMJ Case Reports, 2015, bcr2014208768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lindgren, R., & Johnson-Glenberg, M. (2013). Emboldened by embodiment: Six precepts for research on embodied learning and mixed reality. Educational Researcher, 42(8), 445–452.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13511661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Linz, T., Kallmayer, C., Aschenbrenner, R., & Reichl, H. (2005). Embroidering electrical interconnects with conductive yarn for the integration of flexible electronic modules into fabric. In Proceedings. Ninth IEEE international symposium on wearable computers, 2005 (pp. 86–89). Osaka: IEEE.Google Scholar
  21. Jakicic, J. M., Davis, K. K., Rogers, R. J., King, W. C., Marcus, M. D., Helsel, D., & Belle, S. H. (2016). Effect of wearable technology combined with a lifestyle intervention on long-term weight loss: the IDEA randomized clinical trial. Jama, 316(11), 1161–1171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gallagher, A. G., Ritter, E. M., Champion, H., Higgins, G., Fried, M. P., Moses, G., & Satava, R. M. (2005). Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Annals of Surgery, 241(2), 364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., & Palaniswami, M. (2013). Internet of things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(7), 1645–1660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hum, A. P. (2001). Fabric area network–a new wireless communications infrastructure to enable ubiquitous networking and sensing on intelligent clothing. Computer Networks, 35(4), 391–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hussain, F. (2017). Internet of things: Building blocks and business models (No. 978-3, pp. 319–55404). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Kopetz, H. (2011). Internet of things. In Real-time systems (pp. 307–323). New York: Springer US.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. La, H. J. (2016). A conceptual framework for trajectory-based medical analytics with IoT contexts. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 82(4), 610–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lane, N. D., Bhattacharya, S., Georgiev, P., Forlivesi, C., & Kawsar, F. (2015). An early resource characterization of deep learning on wearables, smartphones and internet-of-things devices. In Proceedings of the 2015 international workshop on internet of things towards applications (pp. 7–12). New York: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee, G. M., Crespi, N., Choi, J. K., & Boussard, M. (2013). Internet of things. In Evolution of telecommunication services (pp. 257–282). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lei, J. (2009). Digital natives as preservice teachers: What technology preparation is needed? Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(3), 87–97.Google Scholar
  31. Lv, Z., Luo, Y., Tang, Y., Wei, J., Zhu, Z., Zhou, X., et al. (2018). Editable supercapacitors with customizable stretchability based on mechanically strengthened ultralong MnO2 nanowire composite. Advanced Materials, 30(2), 1704531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1948). The world of perception. (trans: Davis, O.). London and New York: Routledge. (cited in Stolz, 2014).Google Scholar
  33. Miorandi, D., Sicari, S., De Pellegrini, F., & Chlamtac, I. (2012). Internet of things: Vision, applications and research challenges. Ad Hoc Networks, 10(7), 1497–1516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moinudeen, G. K., Ahmad, F., Kumar, D., Al-Douri, Y., & Ahmad, S. (2017). IoT applications in future foreseen guided by engineered nanomaterials and printed intelligence technologies a technology review. International Journal of Internet of Things, 6(3), 106–148.Google Scholar
  35. Neumann, M. M., & Neumann, D. L. (2014). Touch screen tablets and emergent literacy. Early Childhood Education Journal, 42(4), 231–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ojuroye, O., Torah, R., Beeby, S., & Wilde, A. (2016). Autonomy is the key: From smart towards intelligent textiles. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing: Adjunct (pp. 678–681). New York: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ojuroye, O., Torah, R., & Beeby, S. (2017). Levels of electronic integration within textiles’ chart. A visual categorization system to allow collaboration between Engineers, Computer Scientists, and Textile Designers to produce industrially-feasible electronic textiles. Barcelona, Spain: ACM WomENcourage.Google Scholar
  38. Perera, C., Zaslavsky, A., Christen, P., & Georgakopoulos, D. (2014). Context aware computing for the internet of things: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(1), 414–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pu, X., Li, L., Song, H., Du, C., Zhao, Z., Jiang, C., & Wang, Z. L. (2015). A self-charging power unit by integration of a textile triboelectric nanogenerator and a flexible lithium-ion battery for wearable electronics. Advanced Materials, 27(15), 2472–2478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rogers, E. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
  41. Rus, S., Braun, A., & Kuijper, A. (2017). E-textile couch: towards smart integrated furniture. In European conference on ambient intelligence (pp. 214–224). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Saettler, P. (1968). A history of instructional technology. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  43. Salmon, P. M., Stanton, N. A., & Jenkins, D. P. (2017). Distributed situation awareness: Theory, measurement and application to teamwork. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  44. Shah, N. (2011). Special education pupils find learning tool in iPad applications. Education Week, 30(22), 1–16.Google Scholar
  45. Sobota, J., PiŜl, R., Balda, P., & Schlegel, M. (2013). Raspberry Pi and Arduino boards in control education. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 46(17), 7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stolz, S. A. (2014). Embodied learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(5), 474–487.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.879694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sultan, N. (2015). Reflective thoughts on the potential and challenges of wearable technology for healthcare provision and medical education. International Journal of Information Management, 35(5), 521–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tsai, C. W., Lai, C. F., Chiang, M. C., & Yang, L. T. (2014). Data mining for internet of things: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 16(1), 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vallurupalli, S., Paydak, H., Agarwal, S. K., Agrawal, M., & Assad-Kottner, C. (2013). Wearable technology to improve education and patient outcomes in a cardiology fellowship program-a feasibility study. Health and Technology, 3(4), 267–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Volman, M., & van Eck, E. (2001). Gender equity and information technology in education: The second decade. Review of Educational Research, 71(4), 613–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Welbourne, E., Battle, L., Cole, G., Gould, K., Rector, K., Raymer, S., & Borriello, G. (2009). Building the internet of things using RFID: The RFID ecosystem experience. IEEE Internet Computing, 13(3), 48–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wells, A., Jackson, M., & Benade, L. (2018). Modern learning environments: Embodiment of a disjunctive encounter. In L. Benade & M. Jackson (Eds.), Transforming education. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  53. Wilde, A., Oliver, R., & Zaluska, E. (2013). Developing a low-cost general-purpose device for the internet of things. In the 7th International Conference on Sensing Technology (ICST), Wellington, 2013, 490–494.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSensT.2013.6727701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wilde, A. (2015) Student smartphones: tools or barriers? Attitudes amongst students in higher education in Chile and the UK. At WomENcourage 2015, Uppsala, Sweden. 24–26 Sept 2015.Google Scholar
  55. Wilde, A., Ojuroye, O., & Torah, R. (2015). Prototyping a voice-controlled smart home hub wirelessly integrated with a wearable device. In 9th International Conference on Sensing Technology (ICST) (pp. 71–75). Auckland: IEEE.Google Scholar
  56. Wilde, A. (2016). Understanding persuasive technologies to improve completion rates in MOOCs. At “HCI and the Educational Technology Revolution” HCI Educators Series at AVI 2016, Bari, Italy. 7 June 2016.Google Scholar
  57. Wilde, A., & Zaluska, E. (2016). Held-by-hand learners: A survey of technologies to support positive behaviours of Higher Education students today. In R. Roig-Vila (Ed.), Tecnología, innovación e investigación en los procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje (pp. 3122–3132). Barcelona: Editorial Octaedro.Google Scholar
  58. Xia, F., Yang, L. T., Wang, L., & Vinel, A. (2012). Internet of things. International Journal of Communication Systems, 25(9), 1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yang, L. T., Di Martino, B., & Zhang, Q. (2017). Internet of everything. Mobile Information Systems, 2017, 1–3.Google Scholar
  60. Yuan, L., Powell, S., & CETIS, J. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education. Manchester: Manchester Metropolitan University’s Research Repository.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
  2. 2.University of St AndrewsSt AndrewsUK

Personalised recommendations