Advertisement

Toward Deployment of Architecture Incorporated with IoT for Supporting Work-Based Learning and Training: On the Threshold of a Revolution

  • Dan Kohen-VacsEmail author
  • Gila Kurtz
  • Yanay Zaguri
Chapter

Abstract

Internet of Things (IoT) is an emerging technology expected to transform the way we live, work, and learn. Devices enabled with IoT could be deployed in order to sense conditions from across contexts and settings. Alternatively, such devices could be embedded into wearable accessories.

Even though IoT is in its early stage of development, organizations recognize its potential applicability and therefore incorporate it in their efforts to improve word-based learning and training. Practically, organizations can exploit IoT for supporting personalized and adaptive training. Accordingly, we propose a deployment process aiming to support four scenarios focused on work-based and enhanced by IoT. Specifically, we illustrate our suggestion through a process including a discovery of requirements, followed by a corresponded design and development efforts aspiring on an architecture optimized for corporate learning and training that is empowered by IoT.

We foresee that this architecture will provide employees with exciting opportunities to exploit valuable data in order to react to and refine an ongoing process that produces personal, meaningful, and in-context learning experience. We believe that our efforts to deploy such architecture provide new, flexible, and efficient opportunities for exercising innovative approaches for practicing work-based learning and training.

Keywords

Internet of Things Work-based learning Design process Computer architecture Use-cases 

References

  1. Alexander, I., & Beus-Dukic, L. (2009). Discovering requirements: How to specify products and services. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges. Creating Complex Interventions in Classroom Settings of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, A., & Green, T. (2016). Issues and trends in instructional technology: Increased use of Mobile technologies and digital content to provide untethered access to training and learning opportunities. Educational media and technology yearbook, 15–26.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45001-8_2.
  5. Cheng, H. C., & Liao, W. W. (2012). Establishing a lifelong learning environment using IOT and learning analytics. In Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT), 2012 14th international conference on, pp. 1178–1183. IEEE.Google Scholar
  6. Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education (pp. 15–22). Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fenn, J. (2007). Understanding Gartner’s hype cycles, 5 July 2007.Google Scholar
  9. Gianni, F., Mora, S., & Divitini, M. (2019). RapIoT toolkit: Rapid prototyping of collaborative internet of things applications. Future Generation Computer Systems, 95, 867--879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goldberg, A. (1979). Educational uses of a dynabook. Computers & Education, 3(4), 247–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., & Palaniswami, M. (2013). Internet of things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(7), 1645–1660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hoadley, C. (2002). Creating context: Design-based research in creating and understanding CSCL. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning 2002 (pp. 453–462). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Horizon report. (2017). Retrieved from http://cdn.nmc.org/media/2017-nmc-horizon-report-he-EN.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb 2018.
  14. Karmakar, A., & Nath, A. (2014). E-learning methodologies, strategies and tools to implement lifetime education anywhere anytime. International Journal of Innovative Research in Advanced Engineering (IJIRAE), 1(4), 193–201.Google Scholar
  15. Kohen-Vacs, D. (2016). A design and development approach for deploying web and Mobile applications to support collaborative seamless learning activities. Doctoral dissertation: Linnaeus University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kukulska-Hulme, A., Sharples, M., Milrad, M., Arnedillo-Sánchez, I., & Vavoula, G. (2009). Innovation in mobile learning: A European perspective. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 1(1), 13–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laru, J. (2012). Scaffolding learning activities with collaborative scripts and mobile devices. PhD dissertation, Faculty of Education, University of Oulu, Finland.Google Scholar
  18. Liotta, A. (2012). Farewell to deterministic networks. Communications and Vehicular Technology in the Benelux (SCVT), 2012 IEEE 19th Symposium on. pp. 1–4. IEEE.Google Scholar
  19. Mayer, P., Schroeder, A., & Koch, N. (2008). A model-driven approach to service orchestration. Services Computing, 2008. SCC'08. IEEE international conference on. Vol. 2, pp. 533–536. IEEE.Google Scholar
  20. Milrad, M., Wong, L. H., Sharples, M., Hwang, G. J., Looi, C. K., & Ogata, H. (2013). Seamless learning: An international perspective on next-generation technology-enhanced learning. In Z. L. Berge & L. Y. Muilenburg (Eds.), Handbook of mobile learning (pp. 95–108). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Misuraca, G., & Colombo, C. (2016). ICT-enabled social innovation in support of public sector reform: The potential of integrated approaches to social services delivery to promote social investment policies in Europe. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance (ICEGOV2016) (pp. 163–172). Montevideo/New York: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Perez, C. (2010). Technological revolutions and techno-economic paradigms. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ravenscroft, A., Schmidt, A., Cook, J., & Bradley, C. (2012). Designing social media for informal learning and knowledge maturing in the digital workplace. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(3), 235–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sharples, M., Arnedillo-Sánchez, I., Milrad, M., & Vavoula, G. (2014). Mobile learning. Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, 1513–1573.Google Scholar
  25. Sowa, G., & Marchlewska, A. (2016). The internet of things: Technological and social aspects. Journal of Applied Computer Science Methods, 8(1), 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Swan, M. (2012). Sensor mania! The internet of things, wearable computing, objective metrics, and the quantified self 2.0. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, 1(3), 217–253.  https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan1030217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang, S., Li, L., & Jones, J. D. (2014). Systemic thinking on services science, management and engineering: Applications and challenges in services systems research. IEEE Systems Journal, 8(3), 803–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wishart, J. (2017). Mobile learning in schools: Key issues. Opportunities and Ideas for Practice: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wong, L. H., & Looi, C. K. (2011). What seams do we remove in mobile-assisted seamless learning? A critical review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2364–2381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zezschwitz, E., Buschek, D., Hösl, A., Palleis, H., Scheider, H., Stockinger, T., Stusak, S., Tausch, S., Butz, A., & Hussmann, H. (2015). Human computer interaction in the internet of things era. In Technical Report LMU-MI-2015-.2.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Holon Institute of Technology (HIT)HolonIsrael

Personalised recommendations