Advertisement

Portugal and the European Union: Defining and Contesting the Boundaries of the Political

  • Adam Standring
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores the historical construction of Portugal’s relationship with the European Union from the revolution to the present day, during which there emerged a high level of support for the EU among Portuguese publics, and a marginalisation of opposition to integration from the radical left. This broad consensus is the product of a discursive strategy which associates European integration with a particular vision of Portuguese modernity connected with processes of democratisation and economic growth. The depoliticisation of European integration has been challenged as more policies have moved to the European level and particularly in the wake of the recent financial crisis. These events have served to expose the shifts in both how and where politics is practised in the Portuguese context as well as offering opportunities to (re)politicise the European Union as an issue of social contestation and an issue through which national institutions and politics can be challenged.

References

  1. Accornero, G., & Ramos Pinto, P. (2015). ‘Mild Mannered’? Protest and Mobilisation in Portugal Under Austerity, 2010–2013. West European Politics, 38(3), 491–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barreto, A. (1999). Portugal: Democracy Through Europe. In J. J. Anderson (Ed.), Regional Integration and Democracy: Expanding on the European Experience. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  3. Baumgarten, B. (2013). Geração à Rasca and Beyond: Mobilisations in Portugal After 12 March 2011. Current Sociology, 61(4), 457–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beveridge, R. (2017). The (Ontological) Politics in Depoliticisation Debates: Three Lenses on the Decline of the Political. Political Studies Review.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929916664358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beveridge, R., & Koch, P. (2017). The Post-political Trap? Reflections on Politics, Agency and the City. Urban Studies, 54(1), 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  7. Burnham, P. (2001). New Labour and the Politics of Depoliticisation. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 3(2), 127–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Costa Lobo, M. (2003). Portuguese Attitudes Towards EU Membership: Social and Political Perspectives. South European Society and Politics, 8(1–2), 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Costa Lobo, M., & Magalhães, P. (2001). From ‘Third Wave’ to ‘Third Way’: Europe and the Portuguese Socialists (1975–1999). Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans Online, 3(1), 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Costa Lobo, M., & Magalhães, P. (2011). Room for Manoeuvre: Euroscepticism in the Portuguese Parties and Electorate 1976–2005. South European Society and Politics, 16(1), 81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Costa Pinto, A., & Texeira, N. S. (2002). From Africa to Europe: Portugal and European Integration. In A. C. Pinto & N. S. Texeira (Eds.), Southern Europe and the Making of the European Union. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Davies, W. (2015). The Limits of Neoliberalism: Authority Sovereignty and the Logic of Competition. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Dean, J. (2009). Politics Without Politics. Parallax, 15(3), 20–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dönmez, P. (2014). Crisis and Regional Governance Attempts: The Curious Case of Turkey in Critical Perspective. In T. Haastrup & J. Eun (Eds.), Regionalising Global Crises: The Financial Crisis and New Frontiers in Regional Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Drago, A. (2017). This Is What the Democratic City is Like: Local Democracy, Housing Rights and Homeownership in the Portuguese Constitutional Debate. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(3), 426–442 (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Finlayson, L. (2015). The Political is Political: Conformity and the Illusion of Political Dissent in Contemporary Political Philosophy. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  17. Flinders, M., & Buller, J. (2006). Depoliticisation: Principles. Tactics and Tools. British Politics, 1(3), 293–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Flinders, M., & Wood, M. (2014). Depoliticisation, Governance and the State. Policy & Politics, 42(2), 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Freire, A., Teperoglou, E., & Moury, C. (2014). Awakening the Sleeping Giant in Greece and Portugal? Elites’ and Voters’ Attitudes towards EU Integration in Difficult Economic Times. South European Society and Politics, 19(4), 477–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gullén, A., Álvarez, S., & Adão e Silva, P. (2003). Redesigning the Spanish and Portuguese Welfare States: The Impact of Accession into the European Union. South European Society and Politics, 8(1–2), 231–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hart Ashby, S. (2015). Striking a Balance: An Analysis of Portugal’s European and Lusophone Affiliations and Their Effect on the Evolution of Portuguese National Narratives (Unpublished PhD Thesis). Brown University.Google Scholar
  22. Hay, C. (2007). Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hay, C. (2014). Depoliticisation as Process, Governance as Practice: What Did the ‘First Wave’ Get Wrong and Do We Need a ‘Second Wave’ to Put it Right? Policy & Politics, 42(2), 293–311.Google Scholar
  24. Howarth, D. (2010). Power, Discourse and Policy: Articulating a Hegemony Approach to Critical Policy Studies. Critical Policy Studies, 3(3–4), 309–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Howarth, D., & Griggs, S. (2012). Poststructuralist Policy Analysis: Discourse, Hegemony and Critical Explanation. In F. Fischer & H. Gottweis (Eds.), The Argumentative Turn Revisited: Public Policy as Communicative Practice. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Howarth, D., Glynos, J., & Griggs, S. (2016). Discourse, Explanation and Critique. Critical Policy Studies, 10(1), 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Howarth, D., Norval, A., & Stavrakakis, Y. (2000). Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Jalali, C. (2012). Governing from Lisbon or Governing from Brussels? Models and Tendencies of Europeanization of the Portuguese Government. In N. S. Teixeira & A. C. Pinto (Eds.), The Europeanization of Portuguese Democracy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Jenkins, L. (2011). The Difference Genealogy Makes: Strategies for Politicisation or How to Extend Capacities for Autonomy. Political Studies, 59(1), 156–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  31. Lisi, M. (2009). New Politics in Portugal: The Rise and the Success of the Left Bloc. Pôle Sud, 30, 127–144.Google Scholar
  32. Lisi, M. (2016). U-Turn: The Portuguese Radical Left from Marginality to Government Support. South European Society and Politics. 10.1080/13608746.2016.1225331.
  33. Marchart, O. (2007). Post-foundationalist Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marchart, O. (2011). Democracy and Minimal Politics: The Political Difference and Its Consequences. South Atlantic Quarterly, 110(4), 965–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marks, G., & Hooghe, L. (2003). National Identity and Support for European Integration. Manuscript. Berlin: Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  36. Matthijs, M., & McNamara, K. (2015). The Euro Crisis’ Theory Effect: Northern Saints, Southern Sinners and the Demise of the Eurobond. Journal of European Integration, 37(2), 229–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McNamara, K. (2015). The Politics of Everyday Europe: Constructing Authority in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moravcsik, A. (1994). Why the European Community Strengthens the State: Domestic Politics and International Cooperation (Working Paper). Cambridge, MA: Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  39. Moreira, D., Ruivo, J. P., Costa Pinto, A., & Tavares de Almeida, P. (2010). Attitudes of the Portuguese Elites Towards the European Union. South European Society and Politics, 15(1), 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moury, C., & Standring, A. (2017). Going Beyond the Troika: Power and Discourse in Portuguese Austerity Politics. European Journal of Political Research.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12190.
  41. Príncipe, C. (2016). The Deferred Portuguese Revolution. In C. Príncipe & B. Sunkara (Eds.), Europe in Revolt. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.Google Scholar
  42. Putnam, R. D. (1988). Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organisation, 42(3), 427–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Risse, T. (2003). The Euro Between National and European Identity. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(4), 487–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schmitt, C. (2007). The Concept of the Political (expanded ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Soares, A. G. (2007). Portugal and the European Union: The Ups and Downs in 20 Years of Membership. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 8(4), 460–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Standring, A. (2017). Depoliticising Austerity: Narrative of the Portuguese Debt Crisis, 2011–2015. Policy & Politics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  47. Steinberger, P. (2015). The Politics of Objectivity: An Essay on the Foundations of Political Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tarrow, S. (2011). Global, Conventional and Warring Movements and the Suppression of Contention. Themes in Contentious Politics Research. Política & Sociadade, 10(18), 25–49.Google Scholar
  49. Wood, M. (2016). Politicisation, Depoliticisation and Anti-Politics: Towards a Multilevel Research Agenda. Political Studies Review, 14(4), 521–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adam Standring
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidade Nova de LisboaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations