Introduction

Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Utopianism book series (PASU)

Abstract

As this chapter relates, Robert Owen’s reputation as the “Father of British Socialism” rests on a paradoxical political legacy. Celebrated since the late nineteenth century as a promoter of popular education and co-operative economy, he has been criticised for his “utopian” millenarianism and communitarianism. Since the 1980s, many historians have successfully qualified the Marxist distinction between “utopian” and “scientific” socialism. Following on this trail, this book offers a more empirical approach, in line with Owen’s wish to draw up guidelines for social change from direct experience. Relying on previously unpublished archival sources, it offers a new interpretation of Owen’s early years as the manager of the New Lanark mill village (Scotland), and their impact on his budding socialist thought in the period 1800–1825.

Keywords

Robert Owen New Lanark Socialism Utopianism Utopia Paternalism British history Social history 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

Primary Sources

  1. Manuscripts Google Scholar
  2. Gourock Ropeworks MSS. Glasgow University Library Archive Services.Google Scholar
  3. New Lanark Trust Archives. New Lanark.Google Scholar
  4. Books, Pamphlets and Other Sources Google Scholar
  5. Currie, James. 1831. Memoir of the Life, Writings and Correspondence of James Currie. London: Printed for Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown and Green.Google Scholar
  6. Engels, Friedrich. (1880) 1970. Socialism, Utopian and Scientific, trans. Paul Lafargue. In Selected Works, by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, 95–151. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Marx, Karl. (1867) 1872. Le Capital, trans. Joseph Roy. Paris: Maurice Lachâtre.Google Scholar
  8. Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. (1848) 1992. The Communist Manifesto, ed. David McLellan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Owen, Robert. (1813–1816) 1991. A New View of Society. In Owen 1991, 1–94.Google Scholar
  10. ———. (1816a) 1991. Address Delivered to the Inhabitants of New Lanark. In Owen 1991, 105–135.Google Scholar
  11. ———. (1820) 1991. Report to the County of Lanark. In Owen 1991, 250–308.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 1857–1858. The Life of Robert Owen, Written by Himself, 2 vols. London: Effingham Wilson.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 1991. A New View of Society and Other Writings, ed. Gregory Claeys. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Barthes, Roland. 1972. Mythologies, trans. Annette Lavers. New York: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  2. Beecher, Jonathan. 1986. Charles Fourier: The Visionary and his World. Berkeley: Berkeley University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bendix, Reinhard. 2001. Work and Authority in Industry: Managerial Ideologies in the Course of Industrialization, ed. Mauro F. Guillén. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  4. Berg, Maxine. 1980. The Machinery Question and the Making of Political Economy (1815–1848). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Claeys, Gregory. 1987. Machinery, Money and the Millennium: from Moral Economy to Socialism, 1815–1860. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 1989. Citizens and Saints: Politics and Anti-Politics in the Early Socialist Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 2005. The Revival of Robert Owen: Crafting a Victorian Reputation, c. 1865–1900. In The Emergence of Global Citizenship: Utopian Ideas, Co-operative Movements and the Third Sector, ed. Chushichi Tsuzuki et al., 13–28. Tokyo: Robert Owen Association of Japan.Google Scholar
  8. Claeys, Gregory (ed.). 1993. The Selected Works of Robert Owen. London: Pickering and Chatto.Google Scholar
  9. Cole, G.D.H. 1965. The Life of Robert Owen. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  10. Donnachie, Ian, and George Hewitt. 1993. Historic New Lanark: The Dale and Owen Industrial Community since 1785. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ginzburg, Carlo. 1989. Clues, Myths and the Historical Method. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ginzburg, Carlo, and Carlo Poni. 1981. La micro-histoire. Le débat 10 (17): 133–136.Google Scholar
  13. Harrison, J.F.C. 1969. Owen and the Owenites in Britain and America: The Quest for the New Moral World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 1979. The Second Coming: Popular Millenarianism, 1750–1850. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  15. Holyoake, George Jacob. 1906. The History of Co-operation in England. London: T. Fischer Unwin.Google Scholar
  16. Hutchins, B.L. 1912. Robert Owen, Social Reformer. Fabian Tract 166. London: The Fabian Society.Google Scholar
  17.  Jones, Gareth Stedman. 1981. Utopian Socialism Reconsidered. Science and Religion in the Early Socialist Movement. In People’s History and Socialist Theory, ed. Raphael Samuel, 138–144. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 1983. Languages of Class. Studies in English Working Class History 1832–1982. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Levi, Giovanni. 2001. On Microhistory. In New Perspectives on Historical Writing, ed. Peter Burke, 93–113. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  20. McLaren, David J. 1999. David Dale of New Lanark: A Bright Luminary to Scotland. Milngavie: Heatherbank Press.Google Scholar
  21. Podmore, Frank. 1906. Robert Owen. A Biography. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  22. Roberts, Dennis. 1993. Paternalism in Early Victorian England. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  23. Royle, Edward. 1998. Robert Owen and the Commencement of the Millennium: The Harmony Community at Queenwood Farm, 1839–1845. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Thompson, Edward Palmer. 1963. The Making of the English Working Class. London: Victor Gollancz.Google Scholar
  25. Vulliamy, Edward Colwyn. 1914. Charles Kingsley and Christian Socialism. Fabian Tract 174. London: The Fabian Society.Google Scholar
  26. Webb, Beatrice. 1899. The Co-operative Movement in Great Britain. London: Sonnenschein & Co.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sorbonne Nouvelle UniversityParisFrance

Personalised recommendations