On the Thresholds of Legitimacy: A Collaborative Exploration of Being and Becoming Academic
This chapter uses a collective biography methodology to explore threshold moments of academic legitimacy. They demonstrate the precarious processes and liminal spaces of being and becoming ‘academic’. We examine how the well-documented practices that characterise the corporate/managerial/enterprise university frame the experiences of women aspiring to work in the sector and the affective and embodied ramifications of such practices as casualisation, contractualism, and competition between intellectual workers. Informed by work on academic subjectivities in contemporary universities (e.g. Bansel, Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), 543–556, 2011; Mewburn, Studies in Continuing Education, 33(3), 321–332, 2011; Petersen and Davies, Learning and Teaching, 3(2), 92–109, 2010; Petersen, Studies in Higher Education, 32(4), 475–487, 2007; Petersen, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(3), 394–406, 2008), and specifically on analyses of women’s experiences (e.g. Clegg, Privilege, agency and affect: Understanding the production and effects of action. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013; David, Feminism, gender and universities: Politics, passion and pedagogies. Farnham, UK: Ashgate, 2014; Leathwood and Read, Gender and the changing face of higher education: A feminized future? Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press, 2009; Wilson et al., Gender and Education, 22(5), 535–545, 2010), we explore ambivalence, desire, disappointment, and at times joy in our experiences of securing PhDs and seeking work in universities. We argue that for early career and aspiring academics, becoming ‘academic’ is a precarious, contingent process where legitimacy is always provisional and reliant on conferral from those who are powerfully positioned in and beyond the institution of the academy.
- Charteris, J., Jones, M., Nye, A., & Reyes, V. (2016b). A heterotopology of the academy: Mapping assemblages as possibilised heterotopias. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2016.1250178.
- David, M. (2014). Feminism, gender and universities: Politics, passion and pedagogies. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Davies, B. (1989). Frogs and snails and feminist tales: Preschool children and gender. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
- Davies, B. (1993). Shards of glass: Children reading and writing beyond gendered identities. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
- Davies, B., & Gannon, S. (2006). The practices of collective biography. In B. Davies & S. Gannon (Eds.), Doing collective biography (pp. 1–15). Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Davies, B., & Gannon, S. (Eds.). (2009). Pedagogical encounters. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- Davies, B., & Gannon, S. (2012). Collective biography and the entangled enlivening of being. International Review of Qualitative Research, 5(4), 357–376.Google Scholar
- Dever, M., Boreham, P., Haynes, M., Kubler, M., Laffan, W., Behrens, K., et al. (2008). Gender differences in early post-PhD employment in Australian universities: The influence of PhD experience on women’s academic careers final report. Universities Australia & University of Queensland.Google Scholar
- Gonick, M., & Gannon, S. (Eds.). (2014). Becoming girl: Collective biography and the production of girlhood. Toronto, ON: Women’s Press.Google Scholar
- Haug, F., Andresen, S., Bünz-Elfferding, A., Hauser, K., Lang, U., Laudan, M., et al. (1987). Female sexualization: A collective work of memory. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
- Leathwood, C., & Read, B. (2009). Gender and the changing face of higher education: A feminized future? Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Morley, L. (2011). Misogyny posing as measurement: Disrupting the feminisation crisis discourse. Contemporary Social Science: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences, 6(2), 223–235.Google Scholar
- Peabody, R. (2014). The unruly PhD. Doubts, detours, departures and other success stories. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Wyatt, J., Davies, B., Gale, K., & Gannon, S. (2017). Creating a space in between: Collaborative research inquiries. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar