Advertisement

Acute and Chronic Pelvic Dissociation

  • Eustathios Kenanidis
  • Eleftherios Tsiridis
  • Michael Nogler
  • Neil P. Sheth
  • Christopher M. Melnic
  • Wayne G. Paprosky
  • Fritz Thorey
  • Stanislav Bondarenko
  • Volodymyr Filippenko
  • Volodymyr Mezentsev
Chapter

Abstract

PD is the loss of structural bone or fracture that separates completely the superior (ilium) from the inferior pelvis (ischiopubic segment) through the anterior and posterior columns of the acetabulum [1, 2]. It is a rare complication that ranges between 1 and 8% in revision THA series. Patients at risk are women, patients suffering from RA, and those with history of radiation therapy [1].

References

  1. 1.
    Abdelnasser MK, Klenke FM, Whitlock P, Khalil AM, Khalifa YE, Ali HM, Siebenrock KA. Management of pelvic discontinuity in revision total hip arthroplasty: a review of the literature. Hip Int. 2015;25(2):120–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schwarzkopf R, Ihn HE, Ries MD. Pelvic discontinuity: modern techniques and outcomes for treating pelvic disassociation. Hip Int. 2015;25(4):368–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Petrie J, Sassoon A, Haidukewych GJ. Pelvic discontinuity: current solutions. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B(11 Suppl A):109–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D’Antonio JA, Capello WN, Borden LS, et al. Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;243:126–37.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gross AE. Revision arthroplasty of the acetabulum with restoration of bone stock. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;369:198–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berry DJ, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD, Cabanela ME. Pelvic discontinuity in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81(12):1692–702.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wendt MC, Adler MA, Trousdale RT, Mabry TM, Cabanela ME. Effectiveness of false profile radiographs in detection of pelvic discontinuity. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(7):1408–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Giori NJ, Sidky AO. Lateral and high-angle oblique radiographs of the pelvis aid in diagnosing pelvic discontinuity after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(1):110–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chiang PP, Burke DW, Freiberg AA, Rubash HE. Osteolysis of the pelvis: evaluation and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:164–74.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leung S, Naudie D, Kitamura N, Walde T, Engh CA. Computed tomography in the assessment of periacetabular osteolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(3):592–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bamberg F, Dierks A, Nikolaou K, Reiser MF, Becker CR, Johnson TR. Metal artifact reduction by dual energy computed tomography using monoenergetic extrapolation. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(7):1424–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sporer SM, Bottros JJ, Hulst JB, Kancherla VK, Moric M, Paprosky WG. Acetabular distraction: an alternative for severe defects with chronic pelvic discontinuity? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(11):3156–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stiehl JB, Saluja R, Diener T. Reconstruction of major column defects and pelvic discontinuity in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15(7):849–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eggli S, Muller C, Ganz R. Revision surgery in pelvic discontinuity: an analysis of seven patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;398:136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goodman S, Saastamoinen H, Shasha N, et al. Complications of ilioischial reconstruction rings in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19–4:436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kerboull M, Hamadouche M, Kerboull L. The Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device in major acetabular reconstructions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;378:155–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Paprosky WG, Sporer SS, Murphy BP. Addressing severe bone deficiency: what a cage will not do. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(4 Suppl 1):111–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rogers BA, Whittingham-Jones PM, Mitchell PA, Safir OA, Bircher MD, Gross AE. The reconstruction of periprosthetic pelvic discontinuity. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(8):1499.e1–506.e1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nicholas A, Beckmann MD. Loosening after acetabular revision: comparison of trabecular metal and reinforcement rings a systematic review. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:229–35.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rosson J, Schatzker J. The use of reinforcement rings to reconstruct deficient acetabula. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74–5:716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gerber A, Pisan M, Zurakowski D, et al. Ganz reinforcement ring for reconstruction of acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A(12):2358.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schlegel UJ, Bitsch RG, Pritsch M, et al. Acetabular reinforcement rings in revision total hip arthroplasty: midterm results in 298 cases. Orthopade. 2008;37–9(904):6.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. Acetabular revision using a trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with a pelvic discontinuity. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21–6(Suppl 2):87–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Unger AS, Lewis RJ, Gruen T. Evaluation of a porous tantalum uncemented acetabular cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical and radiological results of 60 hips. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20–8:1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Weeden SH, Schmidt RH. The use of tantalum porous metal implants for Paprosky 3A and 3B defects. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22–6(Suppl 2):151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Siegmeth A, Duncan CP, Masri BA, et al. Modular tantalum augments for acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467–1:199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Davies JH, Laflamme GY, Delisle J, et al. Trabecular metal used for major bone loss in acetabular hip revision. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26–8:1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Flecher X, Sporer S, Paprosky W. Management of severe bone loss in acetabular revision using a trabecular metal shell. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23–7:949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lingaraj K. The management of severe acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty using modular porous metal components. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91-B:1555–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Del Gaizo DJ. Tantalum augments for paprosky IIIA defects remain stable at midterm follow up. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:395–401.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Abolghasemian M, Tangsataporn S, Sternheim A, Backstein D, Safir O, Gross AE. Combined trabecular metal acetabular shell and augment for acetabular revision with substantial bone loss: a mid-term review. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B:166–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Brown NM, Hellman M, Haughom BH, Shah RP, Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. Acetabular distraction: an alternative approach to pelvic discontinuity in failed total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2014;96(11):73–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Amenabar T, Rahman WA, Hetaimish BM, Kuzyk PR, Safir OA, Gross AE. Promising mid-term results with a cup-cage construct for large acetabular defects and pelvic discontinuity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474:408–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sheth NP, Nelson CL, Springer BD, Fehring TK, Paprosky WG. Acetabular bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013;21:128–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Abolghasemian M, et al. The challenge of pelvic discontinuity cup-cage reconstruction does better than conventional cages in mid-term. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B:195–200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kosashvili Y, et al. Acetabular revision using an anti-protrusion (ilio-ischial) cage and trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with pelvic discontinuity. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91-B:870–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Goodman GP, Engh CA Jr. Acetabular Revision. The custom triflange cup. Build it and they will come. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(1 Suppl A):68–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Berasi CC IV, Berend KR, Adams JB, Ruh EL, Lombardi AV Jr. Are custom triflange acetabular components effective for reconstruction of catastrophic bone loss? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:528–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Taunton MJ, Fehring TK, Edwards P, et al. Pelvic discontinuity treated with custom triflange component: a reliable option. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:428–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    DeBoer DK, Christie MJ, Brinson MF, Morrison JC. Revision total hip arthroplasty for pelvic discontinuity. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89-A:835–40.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Holt GE, Dennis DA. Use of custom triflanged acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:209–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Christie MJ, Barrington SA, Brinson MF, Ruhling ME, DeBoer DK. Bridging massive acetabular defects with the triflange cup: 2- to 9-year results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;393:216–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Paprosky W, Sporer S, O’Rourke MR. The treatment of pelvic discontinuity with acetabular cages. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;453(453):183–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    García-Rey E, Madero R, García-Cimbrelo E. THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(12):3882–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Putzer D, Mayr E, Haid C, Reinthaler A, Nogler M. Impaction bone grafting: a laboratory comparison of two methods. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(8):1049–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Coscujuela-Mañá A, Angles F, Tramunt C, Casanova X. Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage for acetabular revision: a 5- to 13-year follow-up study. Hip Int. 2010;20(Suppl 7):S112–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Regis D, Sandri A, Bonetti I, Bortolami O, Bartolozzi P. A minimum of 10- year follow-up of the Burch-Schneider cage and bulk allografts for the revision of pelvic discontinuity. J Arthroplast. 2012;27(6):1057–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kawanabe K, Akiyama H, Goto K, Maeno S, Nakamura T. Load dispersion effects of acetabular reinforcement devices used in revision total hip arthroplasty: a simulation study using finite element analysis. J Arthroplast. 2011;26(7):1061–6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.019. Epub 2011 Jun 14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Korzh NA, Filippenko VA, Mezentsev VA, Bondarenko SE. Reconstruction of acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty. Traumatol Orthop. 2010;9(29):415–7.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Blumenfeld TJ. Implant choices, technique, and results in revision acetabular surgery: a review. Hip Int. 2012;22(3):235–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Pulido L, Rachala SR, Cabanela ME. Cementless acetabular revision: past, present, and future. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the acetabular side using cementless implants. Int Orthop. 2011;35(2):289–98.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eustathios Kenanidis
    • 1
  • Eleftherios Tsiridis
    • 2
  • Michael Nogler
    • 3
  • Neil P. Sheth
    • 4
  • Christopher M. Melnic
    • 5
    • 6
    • 7
  • Wayne G. Paprosky
    • 8
    • 9
  • Fritz Thorey
    • 10
  • Stanislav Bondarenko
    • 11
  • Volodymyr Filippenko
    • 11
  • Volodymyr Mezentsev
    • 11
  1. 1.Academic Orthopaedic UnitAristotle University Medical SchoolThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.Academic Orthopaedic UnitPapageorgiou General Hospital, Aristotle University Medical SchoolThessalonikiGreece
  3. 3.Orthopaedic SurgeryInnsbruckAustria
  4. 4.Orthopaedic SurgeryPennsylvania Hospital, University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  5. 5.Massachusetts General HospitalBostonUSA
  6. 6.Newton-Wellesley HospitalNewtonUSA
  7. 7.Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  8. 8.Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush UniversityChicagoUSA
  9. 9.Central DuPage Hospital—Northwestern UniversityWinfieldUSA
  10. 10.ATOS Hospital HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  11. 11.Department of Joint PathologySytenko Institute of Spine and Joint PathologyKharkivUkraine

Personalised recommendations