Advertisement

Trunnion Disease

  • Eustathios Kenanidis
  • Eleftherios Tsiridis
  • Luigi Zagra
  • Eleonora Caboni
  • Yale A. Fillingham
  • Darren R. Plummer
  • Craig J. Della Valle
Chapter

Abstract

The modularity of stems at the head-neck junction has certain advantages as the decrease of implant stock, the simplification of revision (option to retain the stem and perform head exchange), adaptation of leg length and offset, and use of alternative bearing options [1]. The main disadvantages however are the increase in fretting and crevice corrosion at the taper junction [2, 3]. Their contribution to implant failure is now being increasingly recognized [4].

References

  1. 1.
    Srinivasan A, Jung E, Levine BR. Modularity of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012;20(4):214–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dyrkacz RMR, et al. The influence of head size on corrosion and fretting behaviour at the head-neck interface of artificial hip joints. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(6):1036–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Higgs GB, et al. Is increased modularity associated with increased fretting and corrosion damage in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty devices? A retrieval study. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(8 Suppl):2–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Engh CA, et al. The surgical options and clinical evidence for treatment of wear or corrosion occurring with THA or TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(12):3674–86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sivakumar B, Kumar S, Sankara Narayanan TSN. Fretting corrosion behaviour of Ti–6Al–4V alloy in artificial saliva containing varying concentrations of fluoride ions. Wear. 2011;270(3-4):317–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goldberg JR, Gilbert JL, Jacobs JJ, Bauer TW, Paprosky W, Leurgans S. A multicenter retrieval study of the taperinterfaces of modular hip prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;401:149–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hussenbocus S, Kosuge D, Solomon LB, Howie DW, Oskouei RH. Head-neck taper corrosion in hip arthroplasty. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:758123.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kurtz SM, et al. Do ceramic femoral heads reduce taper fretting corrosion in hip arthroplasty? A retrieval study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(10):3270–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Langton DJ, Sidaginamale R, Lord JK, Nargol AV, Joyce TJ. Taper junction failure in large-diametermetal-on-metal bearings. Bone Joint Res. 2012;1(4):56–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Panagiotidou A, et al. Enhanced wear and corrosion in modular tapers in total hip replacement is associated with the contact area and surface topography. J Orthop Res. 2013;31(12):2032–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nassif NA, et al. Taper design affects failure of large-head metal-on-metal total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(2):564–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Parekh J, et al. Effect of angular mismatch tolerance on trunnion micro-motion in metal-onmetal THA designs. Bone Joint J. 2013;95(Suppl 34):261.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hallab NJ, et al. Differences in the fretting corrosion of metal-metal and ceramicmetal modular junctions of total hip replacements. J Orthop Res. 2004;22(2):250–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hannouche D, et al. Is there a risk in placing a ceramic head on a previously implanted trunion? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(12):3322–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Duisabeau L, Combrade P, Forest B. Environmental effect on fretting of metallic materials for orthopaedic implants. Wear. 2004;256(7-8):805–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Swaminathan V, et al. Fretting corrosion of CoCrMo and Ti6Al4V interfaces. Biomaterials. 2012;33(22):5487–503.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kop AM, et al. Proximal component modularity in THA—at what cost? An implant retrieval study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(7):1885–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Urban RM, et al. Are fretting and corrosion reduced in contemporary head/neck modular junctions?. In Proceedings of the ORS Annual Meeting, Poster No. 1050, 2012.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moga I, et al. Trunnion surface damage in THR: MPE vsMOMarticulations. Bone Joint J. 2013;95(Suppl 34):140.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Moga M, et al. Variables influencing tribo-corrosion of modular junctions in metal-on polyethylene THR? In proceedings of the American academy of orthopedic surgeons annual meeting, Paper 614, 2014.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cooper HJ, et al. Corrosion at the head-neck taper as a cause for adverse local tissue reactions after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(18):1655–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Garbuz DS, et al. The John Charnley award: metal-on-metal hip resurfacing versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(2):318–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mroczkowski ML, et al. Effect of impact assembly on the fretting corrosion of modular hip tapers. J Orthop Res. 2006;24(2):271–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rehmer A, et al. Influence of assembly procedure and material combination on the strength of the taper connection at the head-neck junction of modular hip endoprostheses. Clin Biomech. 2012;27(1):77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Alexander J, et al. The effect of tribo-chemical damage on mechanical performance of TIAlV-CoCr taper junctions. In international society for technology in arthroplasty, Poster 2556, 2013.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hernigou P, et al. One hundred and fifty years of history of the Morse taper: from Stephen a. Morse in 1864 to complications related to modularity in hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2013;37(10):2081–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Carli A, Politis A, Zukor D, Huk O, Antoniou J. Clinically significant corrosion at the head-neck taper interface in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and case series. Hip Int. 2015;25(1):7–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kwon YM, Fehring TK, Lombardi AV, Barnes CL, Cabanela ME, Jacobs JJ. Risk stratification algorithm for management of patients with dual modular taper total hip arthroplasty: consensus statement of the American association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and the Hip Society. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(11):2060–4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth2014.07.029. Epub 2014 Jul 31CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Walsh CP, Hubbard JC, Nessler JP, Markel DC. Revision of recalled modular neck rejuvenate and ABG femoral implants. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(5):822–6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.12.002. Epub 2014 Dec 5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Esposito CI, Wright TM, Goodman SB, Berry DJ. What is the trouble with trunnions? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(12):3652–8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3746-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Plummer DR, Berger RA, Paprosky WG, Sporer SM, Jacobs JJ, Della Valle CJ. Diagnosis and management of adverse local tissue reactions secondary to corrosion at the head-neck junction in patients with metal on polyethylene bearings. J Arthroplast. 2016;31(1):264–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eustathios Kenanidis
    • 1
  • Eleftherios Tsiridis
    • 2
  • Luigi Zagra
    • 3
  • Eleonora Caboni
    • 4
  • Yale A. Fillingham
    • 5
  • Darren R. Plummer
    • 6
  • Craig J. Della Valle
    • 7
  1. 1.Academic Orthopaedic UnitAristotle University Medical SchoolThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.Academic Orthopaedic UnitPapageorgiou General Hospital, Aristotle University Medical SchoolThessalonikiGreece
  3. 3.Hip DepartmentIstituto Ortopedico Galeazzi IRCCSMilanItaly
  4. 4.Hip DepartmentIstituto Ortopedico Galeazzi IRCCSMilanItaly
  5. 5.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryDartmouth College, Geisel School of MedicineHanoverUSA
  6. 6.The Ohio State University Wexner Medical CenterColumbusUSA
  7. 7.Division of Adult ReconstructionRush University Medical CenterChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations