Advertisement

Finding Our Voices in the Dangling Conversations: Co-producing Digital Stories About Dementia

  • Rosie Stenhouse
  • Jo Tait
Chapter

Abstract

The concept of power, as embodied by the storyteller’s voice, is key to the digital storytelling process. Stenhouse and Tait reflect on attempts to promote the voice of people with dementia during a digital storytelling workshop. Adaptations to the usual digital storytelling process risked silencing participants’ voices through 1:1 facilitation, holding the narrative ‘threads’ for participants and writing the scripts to enable people with dementia to engage. Facilitators’ engagement with issues of voice and power through reflection in and on action supported a co-creative relationship with participants, opening up spaces for their voices to be heard. The chapter also engages with the issue of authorial voice in the process of collaborative writing, resulting in a literary style that allows the voices of both authors to be heard.

The stories created as part of this project can be viewed on the Patient Voices website at www.patientvoices.org.uk/dc.htm

References

  1. Duff, B. (2011). It’s home. Pilgrim Projects. Retrieved May 2017, from http://www.patientvoices.org.uk/flv/0548pv384.htm
  2. Gee, J. P. (1985). The narrativization of experience in the oral style. Journal of Education, 167(1), 9–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Haraway, D. J. (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Hynd, E. (2011). Some things don’t change. Pilgrim Projects. Retrieved May 2017, from http://www.patientvoices.org.uk/flv/0549pv384.htm
  5. Kerr, W. (2011). Still fit. Pilgrim Projects. Retrieved May 2017, from http://www.patientvoices.org.uk/flv/0552pv384.htm
  6. Kitwood, T. (1997). Dementia reconsidered: The person comes first. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy within/in the postmodern (critical social thought). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Polkinghorne, D. E. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  9. Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Smith, A. (2011). Making the most of life. Pilgrim Projects. Retrieved May 2017, from http://www.patientvoices.org.uk/flv/0546pv384.htm
  11. Smith, R. (2011). It’s a different world. Pilgrim Projects. Retrieved May 2017, from http://www.patientvoices.org.uk/flv/0551pv384.htm
  12. Stenhouse, R., Tait, J., Hardy, P., & Sumner, T. (2013). Dangling conversations: Reflections on the process of creating digital stories during a workshop with people with early stage dementia. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 20(2), 134–141. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2850.2012.01900.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Third, G. (2011). It’s the art. Pilgrim Projects. Retrieved May 2017, from http://www.patientvoices.org.uk/flv/0550pv384.htm
  14. Whynne, A. (2011). The lad fae Norrie’s Pend. Pilgrim Projects. Retrieved May 2017, from http://www.patientvoices.org.uk/flv/0547pv384.htm

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosie Stenhouse
    • 1
  • Jo Tait
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Nursing Studies, School of Health in Social ScienceUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
  2. 2.Wayside, WhitewayStroudUK

Personalised recommendations