Conclusion and Discussion

  • Hassan Abouabdelkader


The growing interest in language assessment reported in this edited collection provides a succinct description of the changes that have taken place in the structure of several universities in the Arab World. The ten chapters of this volume offer a wide range of perspectives on EFL writing assessment in Arab universities from varied and compelling perspectives. Altogether, the studies offer abundant information concerning the educational programmes provided by many universities in the Arab world.


  1. Abouabdelkader, H., & Bouziane, A. (2016). The teaching of EFL writing in Morocco: Challenges and realities. In A. Abdelhamid & H. Abouabdelkader (Eds.), Teaching EFL writing in the 21st century Arab world. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed, A. (2017). Assessment of EFL writing in some Arab world university contexts: Issues and challenges. In A. Ahmed & H. Abouabdelkader (Eds.), Assessing EFL writing in the Arab world universities in 21st century Arab world: Revealing the unknown. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Ahmed, A., & Abouabdelkader, H. (2016). Teaching EFL writing in the 21st century Arab world: Realities & challenges. Palgrave Macmillan, UK.Google Scholar
  4. Andrade, H. G. (2005). Teaching with rubrics: The good, the bad, and the ugly. College Teaching, 53(1), 27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crusan, D. (2015). Dance, ten; looks, three: Why rubrics matter. Assessing Writing, 26, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. (1983). Uncovering cognitive processes in writing: An introduction to protocol analysis. In P. Mosethal, L. Tamor, & S. Walmsley (Eds.), Research in writing: Principals and methods (pp. 269–274). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  7. Knoch, U. (2009). Diagnostic assessment of writing: A comparison of two rating scales. Language Testing, 26(2), 275–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Liangprayoon, S. (2013). The effect of topical structure analysis instruction on university students’ writing quality. English Language Teaching, 6(7), 60–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McMillan, J. (2000). Fundamental assessment principles for teachers and school administrators. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, April 24. Retrieved May 24, 2017, from
  10. Swain, S., & Mahieu, P. L. (2012). Assessment in a culture of inquiry: The story of the national writing projects analytical writing continuum. In N. Elliot & L. Perelman (Eds.), Writing assessment in the 21st century: Essays in honor of Edward M. White (pp. 45–68). New York: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  11. Taylor, L. (2009). Developing assessment literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 29, 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Topping, K. (2003). Self and peer assessment in school and university: Reliability, validity and utility. In M. Segers, F. Dochy, & E. Cascallar (Eds.), Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards (pp. 55–87). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Tzipora, R., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2017). To make a long story short: “A rubric for assessing graduate students’ academic and popular science writing skills”. Assessing Writing, 32, 28–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Volante, L., & Fazio, X. (2007). Exploring teacher candidates’ assessment literacy: Implications for teacher education reform and professional development. Canadian Journal of Education, 30(3), 749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hassan Abouabdelkader
    • 1
  1. 1.Ecole Nationales Supérieure des Arts et Métiers, Moulay Ismail UniverityMeknesMorocco

Personalised recommendations